Re: [PSES] DoC - reference to ROHS directive

2024-04-26 Thread Matthew Wilson | GBE
06210991. ​Registered office: Ascot House Mulberry Close, Woods Way, Goring By Sea, West Sussex, BN12 4QY. From: Charlie Blackham Sent: Monday, April 22, 2024 7:26 AM To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG Subject: Re: [PSES] DoC - reference to ROHS directive I wouldn’t say that it was “wrong” to add

Re: [PSES] DoC - reference to ROHS directive

2024-04-22 Thread Charlie Blackham
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG Subject: Re: [PSES] DoC - reference to ROHS directive What I've seen is language like "2011/65/EU RoHS directive with amendment 2015/863/EU" or "2011/65/EU RoHS directive as amended by 2015/863/EU" The 2015 amendment adds four substances to the

Re: [PSES] DoC - reference to ROHS directive

2024-04-21 Thread MIKE SHERMAN
What I've seen is language like "2011/65/EU RoHS directive with amendment 2015/863/EU" or "2011/65/EU RoHS directive as amended by 2015/863/EU" The 2015 amendment adds four substances to the original six, so you should mention both it and the 2011 directive. Mike Sherman Sherman PSC LLC > On

Re: [PSES] DoC - reference to ROHS directive

2024-04-21 Thread Charlie Blackham
Sent: Sunday, April 21, 2024 7:39 PM To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG Subject: Re: [PSES] DoC - reference to ROHS directive The proper directive reference remains 2011/65/EU. If you look at the current version of that directive, it incorporates all of the modification, so there is no need

Re: [PSES] DoC - reference to ROHS directive

2024-04-21 Thread Tom Smith
The proper directive reference remains 2011/65/EU. If you look at the current version of that directive, it incorporates all of the modification, so there is no need to separately reference the amending documents. Regards Tom Smith, P.Eng Principal Engineer TJS Technical Services Inc. Tel: +1