06210991.
Registered office: Ascot House Mulberry Close, Woods Way, Goring By Sea, West
Sussex, BN12 4QY.
From: Charlie Blackham
Sent: Monday, April 22, 2024 7:26 AM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] DoC - reference to ROHS directive
I wouldn’t say that it was “wrong” to add
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] DoC - reference to ROHS directive
What I've seen is language like
"2011/65/EU RoHS directive with amendment 2015/863/EU"
or
"2011/65/EU RoHS directive as amended by 2015/863/EU"
The 2015 amendment adds four substances to the
What I've seen is language like
"2011/65/EU RoHS directive with amendment 2015/863/EU"
or
"2011/65/EU RoHS directive as amended by 2015/863/EU"
The 2015 amendment adds four substances to the original six, so you should
mention both it and the 2011 directive.
Mike Sherman
Sherman PSC LLC
> On
Sent: Sunday, April 21, 2024 7:39 PM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] DoC - reference to ROHS directive
The proper directive reference remains 2011/65/EU. If you look at the current
version of that directive, it incorporates all of the modification, so there is
no need
The proper directive reference remains 2011/65/EU. If you look at the
current version of that directive, it incorporates all of the modification,
so there is no need to separately reference the amending documents.
Regards
Tom Smith, P.Eng
Principal Engineer
TJS Technical Services Inc.
Tel: +1
5 matches
Mail list logo