06210991.
Registered office: Ascot House Mulberry Close, Woods Way, Goring By Sea, West
Sussex, BN12 4QY.
From: Charlie Blackham
Sent: Monday, April 22, 2024 7:26 AM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] DoC - reference to ROHS directive
I wouldn’t say that it was “wrong” to add
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] DoC - reference to ROHS directive
What I've seen is language like
"2011/65/EU RoHS directive with amendment 2015/863/EU"
or
"2011/65/EU RoHS directive as amended by 2015/863/EU"
The 2015 amendment adds four substances to the
What I've seen is language like
"2011/65/EU RoHS directive with amendment 2015/863/EU"
or
"2011/65/EU RoHS directive as amended by 2015/863/EU"
The 2015 amendment adds four substances to the original six, so you should
mention both it and the 2011 directive.
Mike Sherman
Sherman PSC LLC
> On
Sent: Sunday, April 21, 2024 7:39 PM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] DoC - reference to ROHS directive
The proper directive reference remains 2011/65/EU. If you look at the current
version of that directive, it incorporates all of the modification, so there is
no need
21, 2024 11:52 AM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: [PSES] DoC - reference to ROHS directive
I have the last 10+ years made reference to ROHS directive 2011/65/EU in the
DoC.
Now, I have been told to switch to 2015/863/EU? Is that correct?
>From what I see on the EU web site, 201
I have the last 10+ years made reference to ROHS directive 2011/65/EU in the
DoC.
Now, I have been told to switch to 2015/863/EU? Is that correct?
>From what I see on the EU web site, 2015/863 is a Commission Delegated
Directive, amending Annex II to Directive 2011/65/EU
As I understand,
6 matches
Mail list logo
