On 08/14/2017 08:31 AM, Paul Howarth wrote:
> On 2017-08-11 19:00, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
>> I have opened 2 tickets in RELENG to have these packages
>> removed/blocked for EPEL.
>>
>> Packages which are newer in EPEL than RHEL-7.4
>>
>> https://pagure.io/releng/issue/6948
>>
>> Packages
Hi Boaz,
On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 02:35:59PM -, Boaz Ackerman wrote:
> We are trying to figure out what happened to the xmlsec-devel package for
> RHEL.
>
> I was told by list owner (which was super helpful!) that:
>
> It seems it's now included in RHEL 7.4 (and upcoming centos 7.4):
>
We are trying to figure out what happened to the xmlsec-devel package for RHEL.
I was told by list owner (which was super helpful!) that:
It seems it's now included in RHEL 7.4 (and upcoming centos 7.4):
On 2017-08-11 19:00, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
I have opened 2 tickets in RELENG to have these packages
removed/blocked for EPEL.
Packages which are newer in EPEL than RHEL-7.4
https://pagure.io/releng/issue/6948
Packages which are older in EPEL than RHEL-7.4 but exist in aarch64,
x86_64,
The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
889 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-1087
dokuwiki-0-0.24.20140929c.el7
651 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-dac7ed832f
mcollective-2.8.4-1.el7
233
The following Fedora EPEL 6 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
767 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-7031
python-virtualenv-12.0.7-1.el6
761 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-7168
rubygem-crack-0.3.2-2.el6
651
