On Wed, May 4, 2022 at 1:00 PM Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 04. 05. 22 15:40, Troy Dawson wrote:
> > I just want to make sure that you are querying RHEL 9.0 and not 9.1.
>
> Well, I was querying 9.1, so you have a point. However, with 9.0 it is
> almost
> the same:
>
> $ comm -12 <(repoquery -q
>
On 04. 05. 22 22:03, Josh Boyer wrote:
The only difference I can spot is anthy-unicode-devel and
double-conversion-devel, which apparently might be allowed in EPEL 9 for now.
Both of those were requested and added in the last month
(anthy-unicode-devel just this week). That should be reflected
On Wed, May 4, 2022 at 4:00 PM Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> On 04. 05. 22 15:40, Troy Dawson wrote:
> > I just want to make sure that you are querying RHEL 9.0 and not 9.1.
>
> Well, I was querying 9.1, so you have a point. However, with 9.0 it is almost
> the same:
>
> $ comm -12 <(repoquery -q
>
On 04. 05. 22 15:40, Troy Dawson wrote:
I just want to make sure that you are querying RHEL 9.0 and not 9.1.
Well, I was querying 9.1, so you have a point. However, with 9.0 it is almost
the same:
$ comm -12 <(repoquery -q
--repo=RHEL9.0-{BaseOS,AppStream,CRB,HighAvailability} -a | pkgname
Hi Miro,
Thank you for looking into this.
One thing to keep in mind is that what is in CentOS Stream 9 right now, is
going into RHEL 9.1, so some of this won't be in epel9 for another 6-7
months.
I've noticed that in your query's you do a RHEL9 query. Where is that
coming from?
I just want to
On Wed, 4 May 2022 at 08:55, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> Hello EPEL.
>
> I have just found out that the pybind11 component from c9s / RHEL 9 CRB
> has
> been built in EPEL 9 in different version:
>
>
>
> Do I understand correctly that this is still *not* allowed? If so, what
> can we
> do to
