Am I right in believing that the new 120 film holder, from Minolta enables
one to scan, at 2820dpi, the entire surface if a 120 neg, by making 3
passes over the film , then stitching the three scans, together ?
Will this holder work with the VeiwScan software, or only with the Scan
Multi Mk2
Ingemar wrote:
I just joined the list. Give me one good reason to stay on!
Agreed. Amusing though the off topic threads can be, we really need to try
to take them off the list.
Rob
(at least the stuff about Epson printers was vaguely related to scanning!)
In a message dated 11/18/2000 4:13:26 AM EST,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Am I right in believing that the new 120 film holder, from Minolta enables
one to scan, at 2820dpi, the entire surface if a 120 neg, by making 3
passes over the film , then stitching the three scans, together ?
I've
Excuse me for sounding dumb, but if I can get hold of the new holder, I will
be able to scan an entire 6x6 neg, at 2820dpi, just with my Scan Multi Mk1,
ViewScan and a third party software to stitch the three scans together, is
that right ?
P.S. Can you not use Photoshop to stitch the scans
John,
How much does the new holder cost, in the UK ?
The UH-M1 holder is £199.99, part number 2883950.
Contact Paul Genge at Minolta UK for further info
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I've found him to be very helpful with regard to the Scan Multi.
Trevor S
Tony,
Any chance of putting the link above at the end of the message
instead of at the beginning? Seems like it would be a bit less
intrusive there, yet still available for those needing it.
--
Roger, List-Owner
The LEG (Leica Enthusiasts Mailing List)
http://www.topica.com/lists/leica
Sounds like someone that knows everything has put themselves in charge of the list, the rest that dot know to much can just go pound salt. Afterall we aren't here to learn and teach, when will people learn, this is a mutual admiration society!
Good day all
I am looking for software and hardware to calibrate my monitor,
scanner and printer. I need recommendations from those that have done
this. On list or off.
Thanks
Chuck Phelps
Film Service Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
This should be off list, but perhaps one more time?!
Why? The anecdotal "evidence" from the field is compelling.
Grounded
and expert recording professionals consistently say there are
easily
and consistently heard differences between 44.1 bit - 16K and any
of
the higher rate recording
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Chuck Phelps
Sent: Saturday, November 18, 2000 7:18 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: filmscanners: Monitor Calibration And Others
Good day all
I am looking for software and hardware to
The holder is just that - a holder. It includes a set of blank masking
cards which the user must custom cut their own windows into according to
their own needs. Because it is just a holder, it will work with any scanner
software that one chooses to use with the Scan Multi (original or II)
on 11/18/00 12:35 PM, Robert DeCandido at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Finally, in NYC at the recent photo show, the
President of the company was running around getting info for people and
answering questions. I was impressed with the company because it seems like
they take the time to be
I owns a LS-30 and IMHO the ICE is something
extremely useful .
I think Canon is missing ICE.
Sincerely.
Ezio
www.lucenti.com e-photography
site
- Original Message -
From:
Jan
Copier
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, November 18, 2000 4:26
PM
Are there any people in here who actually shoot, or better still, sell,
photographs ?
I do
Lawrence
http://www.lwsphoto.com
Are there any people in here who actually shoot, or better still, sell,
photographs ?
I do
Me too...and I even shoot with film and scan the film with a scanner ;-)
The only dimensions that matter are the number of pixels. The dpi and
hence the "physical dimensions" are utterly meaningless.
That's erroneous to say they are 'utterly meaningless'. They CLEARLY are
utterly meaningFUL to the printer driver, and, along with the xy number of
pixels,
I find extensis porfolio 5.0 does exactly what you need.
Elroy Eckhardt
And there is an entirely free, though somewhat cut-down version, available for download
from www.creativepro.com
Regards
Tony Sleep
http://www.halftone.co.uk - Online portfolio exhibit; + film scanner info
Surely, if the purple anti aliasing tint, (whatever that is),
It's actually an anti-halation dye in the film base.
is still
present, when scanning with the colour setting, you would possibly get a
green cast, not purple, because you get the opposite colours when turning a
neg into a
I've tried a couple of the programs which have been suggested and here are
some comments which I hope may be of help to others. I wouldn't use Jasc
Media Center or Armadillo Photo, but they may be useful for others. Thanks
for everyone's suggestions so far!
1. Jasc Media Center Plus 3
o
Tony Sleep wrote:
I do run it from a APC UPS power supply, if that is of any help
to anyone. I don't know if the scanners are sensitive to power fluctuations,
but it seems like a good idea to eliminate them. Anyone have any thoughts on
this subject?
There was some discussion of this a
Based on what I found when I asked the same question, you will receicve
answers from people who selected and have used only the LS-30, some who
have only used the Canon, and a third group who have tested or compared
both. It really comes down to what you want to spend in $$$, the
bits/channel
I do all of that tooand print the results on my printer. Each of these area
of producing scanned images and things pretty directly related to them seem to
be good topices for this group.
Gordon
Austin Franklin wrote:
Are there any people in here who actually shoot, or better still, sell,
I would appreciate if you want to discuss this further, we take this off
list.
Please!
Regards
Tony Sleep
http://www.halftone.co.uk - Online portfolio exhibit; + film scanner info
comparisons
When I joined this list, I thought that it was for the purpose of discussing
scanners, in order to get the best possible end result, THE IMAGE.
Yes. Please folks, although the occasional diversion is fine, can everyone try
sitting on their hands when tempted to reply to OT threads - or mail
the real wish to share hard-found knowledge, practical or theoretical?
That is actually one thing this list has been pretty good at. Do you have a
specific scanning question you would like answered?
Regards
Tony Sleep
http://www.halftone.co.uk - Online portfolio exhibit; + film scanner
If you (or anyone) believes CD 'quality' sounds rough, I assure you it has
nothing to do with the sample rate. Spend a few bucks and buy a well
designed CD player and you will 'discover' that 44.1 kHz works just fine.
N! Please not the CD vs. vinyl thread *here*... or why HDCD sounds
... or why HDCD sounds better!
I could tell you if you really wanted to know ;-)
Hi Rob,
This is something I've been researching off and on for the past year. I
have, or am in the position to get, evaluation (full) versions of probably
any image management program for a magazine article I've been preparing. If
anyone interested would supply me with a list of desired image
28 matches
Mail list logo
