> Hello,
>
> ok, I guess I need to create a DESC index on TIMESTAMP of MY_TABLE.
> I could verify this speeds it up from 1 minute to 1 second.
> This works as long as MY_TABLE is a real table.
> But now MY_TABLE is actually a View.
>
> Can I created a index on a view with firebird?
No, but an
Hello,
> Are NULLs considered values for unique constraints on a table?
No. NULL is not evaluated as part of a unique constraint.
What you could do is to declare your column as NOT NULL and provide a
DEFAULT value/clause for your column, using a value which your
application interprets as
> I am running SS FB 3.0.4 x64 in Windows 10 x64 with 16GB RAM.
>
> Database properties
>
> ODS Version 12
> Page size 16384
> Pages 437728
> Size on disk 6.68GB
> Page buffers 10240
> Read only false
>
> Settings
>
> Dialect 3
> Default character set NONE
> Sweep
Hi Mark,
> On 30-5-2019 16:14, Thomas Steinmaurer t...@iblogmanager.com
> [firebird-support] wrote:
>>> Also one further question Do later versions of Firebird (ie. 3 or
>>> 4) have any performance increase for cooperative garbage collection at
>>> all? Woul
> Also one further question Do later versions of Firebird (ie. 3 or
> 4) have any performance increase for cooperative garbage collection at
> all? Would I expect to see any performance improvement by any newer
> version, or different server implementation here?
Likely TRUNCATE TABLE ...
Hi,
> Hi,
>
>
> Is this list allowed to post SQL queries ou links? Anyway if someone is
> interested and can help me, I did a recent post on SO which has been a
> great challenge to me, although it seems simple at first sight:
>
>
>
> I have a program that uses Firebird 2.1. Most installation use the
> embedded version so I prefer to stick with 2.1 since it does all I need.
>
> I have a question about transactions: if I start a transaction, I add or
> modify some data, then the program gets an exception and it crashes,
>
Hello Josef,
> Hi,
>
>
> with our client software installed on a terminal server we like to get the
> IP-Adress of the "real" client-computer connected to the database (the one
> the
> user sits in front of).
>
>
> With Mon$Remote_Address from Mon$Attachments (using FB 2.5.8) we get the
>
Alex,
> Hi All,
>
> I have found strange behaviour concerning trailing spaces - following
> strings are equal:
>
> 'ABC ' = 'ABC'
>
> You can try the following query:
>
> /select/
> / case when 'ABC ' = 'ABC' then 1 else 0 end,/
> / case when cast('ABC ' as varchar(10)) = cast('ABC'
>> Hmm... what do you mean ?
>
>> There should be almost instant message about trace started with trace ID,
>> but then messages will appear only when some events happens in database.
>
> Well, I started the trace and the system prompted the message about trace
> start
> its ID. But there was
> I am only using some functions from the ib_udf.dll which is installed in
> the \Firebird\Firebird_3_0\UDF and have built a little functions
> calling functions of that dll there is no problem I suppose ?
If you are talking about a PSQL-based stored function (new feature in
3.0), then you
Hi,
> Yes in my delphi application I registered the event name
> I tried POST_EVENT in a stored procedure but without DELETE FROM
> MON$ATTACHMENTS statement
> sometimes it is fired sometimes not. I didn't understand why
>
>
> When I write the event name like this :
>
> 1-POST_EVENT
> Hello,
>
> I am deleting user connected with:
> DELETE FROM MON$ATTACHMENTS WHERE MON$ATTACHMENT_ID = :ID_CONNECTION;
>
> I need to use POST_EVENT in order to notify user that he has been disconnected
> but don't found a trigger for MON$ATTACHMENTS to do it. Can you please help
> me
> ?
>
Hi,
> Hi fellow Firebird users,
>
> Background:
>
> * Current Firebird version is 2.5
>
> * Windows OS could be anything...
>
> * We are using C# with FirebirdClient ADO.NET Data Provider
>
> * The software we write extracts and monitors the Firebird database
> Hello Group,
>
> Sorry if this double posts, I received an error when Sending.
>
> I was provided with a largish (~27GB) Firebird 2.5 backup file (gbak)
> yesterday. I have been restoring this on Windows 2012R2 running 2.5.6 Classic
> using gbak with the -service_mgr switch. This particular VM
Hi,
> I have been using Firebird 2.5.7 64 bit on Windows 7 for sometime, also
> using FreeAdhocUDF. I just installed Firebird 3.0.2.32703 64 bit and now
> FreeAdhocUDF is no longer loading.
>
> I see that there is a support ticket in place for this exact bug, but so
> far no resolution. This
single
> server process.
>
> Regards,
> Alexey Kovyazin
> IBSurgeon
> www.ib-aid.com
>
>
>
>
> On 02.09.2017 20:46, Thomas Steinmaurer t...@iblogmanager.com
> [firebird-support] wrote:
>>
>> Hi Thomas,
>>
>> > From what i can
Hi Thomas,
> From what i can read on the internet TempCacheLimit, is per server
> process, and not per attachment.
In SuperServer architecture, right, but if I remember correctly, you
have mentioned in one of your first posts that you are using
SuperClassic, right?
>
Hi,
> Thanks for the advise Thomas I will increase the value.
> After we changed TempCacheLimit to 567108864, we saw the problem once
> under heavy load - for a very sourt perio this time.
Increased TempCacheLimit value as a side-effect of serving more temp
stuff through RAM instead of
> Hey Thomas
> Thanks for the answer. The command output is this:
> Max cpu time unlimited unlimited seconds
> Max file size unlimited unlimited bytes
> Max data size unlimited unlimited bytes
>
Hello Thomas,
> Hey
> The other day we had a major slowdown on a database - one server with a single
> database. Some of our queries received this error:
> Sort error No free space found in temporary directories operating system
> directive open failed
> All queries that received this error used
Hello,
> Hello,
>
> Is there a way to ask a database if someone is performing a nbackup?
>
> If it's in "the physical backup mode".
>
> I'm always paranoid if there is a power failure during a backup and it
> gets stuck in that mode and I would like it to recover from such situation.
> We
Ed,
FB TraceManager parses gstat output and give you table/index size (MB),
percentage of total database size etc. but actually does not have
charting in that area.
Check out screens here:
http://www.upscene.com/fb_tracemanager/media
* Table Stats Monitoring, and
* Index Stats Monitoring
--
> Hi all,
>
> I need more help to archive this task.
>
>
> I just copied the file flembed.dll and others in my directory(bin)
> now i can connect to my database, with gsec or isql
>
>
> but when i try to change de sysdba password in commande line, i got this
> message :
>
>
> SQL> alter
> SYSDBA users can see other connected users using monitoring tables but is it
> possible to implement such feature for non-SYSDBA users? Are there
> event/triggers that act uppon connecting and disconnecting and which can
> insert
> usual database records. Triggers no MON$ tables are not
> Hi,
>
>
> I’am running multiples instances of Firebird CS 2.5 x64. But all instances
> uses the same “lock dir”. How I can change the "lock dir” default value
> "/tmp/firebird”?
> I will appreciate any help.
To my understanding, this can get dangerous when you start to separate shared
> fbclient.dll is bundled with the client application.
If I remember correctly, you need a client library 2.1+ to get that information
popping up in MON$ATTACHMENTS
--
With regards,
Thomas Steinmaurer
http://www.upscene.com
Professional Tools and Services for Firebird
FB TraceManager, IB
> hi,I am Nobuo Watanabe.
> I use FireBird 2.5.6 and FireBird2.5.3.
>
> Firebird2.5Language Reference about 'merge command' says:
> Currently, the ROW_COUNT variable returns the value 1, even if more than one
> record is modified or inserted. For details and progress, refer to Tracker
> ticket
> Hello,
>
>
> I am testing Firebird 3 in order to upgrade an application from Firebird 2.5
> and I would like to know if there are known cases of Firebird 3 performances
> that are worse than Firebird 2.5. During my tests, it seems that bulk
> insertions take longer in Firebird 3.
Hello Sean,
>>> For some reason they both have the new value and I can't figure out why.
>>> If I didn't misread all the articles, I've found, completely, then
>>> they should be different, shouldn't they?
>>>
>>>
>>> I'm using Firebird 2.5.2.26539.
>>
>> Any chance that another trigger is
Hi,
> shouldn't the values of new.somefield and old.somefield be different in
> an after update trigger, when the value of that field has definitely
> changed?
>
>
> For some reason they both have the new value and I can't figure out why.
> If I didn't misread all the articles, I've found,
> Hi
>
> I have a database, which have had to instances where there have been
> Transactions in limbo.
> I know how to fix this.
>
> I am on the other hand unsure why they appear.
> What can cause this?
> What should/could I check, so I can eliminate this from occuring.
Something went wrong
Hello Fabian,
> Sorted after reading "Initializing the Security Database" from
> http://www.firebirdsql.org/file/documentation/release_notes/Firebird-3.0.0-ReleaseNotes.pdf
> at page 116. I think there is a small error on the documentation, where it
> says
> " isql -user sysdba employee", the
> 'Thomas Steinmaurer' t...@iblogmanager.com [firebird-support] a écrit :
>> trsk...@yahoo.com [firebird-support] schrieb am 02.06.2016 06:44:
>>
>>> Where I can download v3.0.1 ?
>>
>> 3.0.1 hasn't been released yet, but snapshot builds are available he
trsk...@yahoo.com [firebird-support] schrieb am 02.06.2016 06:44:
> Where I can download v3.0.1 ?
3.0.1 hasn't been released yet, but snapshot builds are available here:
http://www.firebirdsql.org/en/snapshot-builds/
--
With regards,
Thomas Steinmaurer
http://www.upscene.com
Professional
>> What value must it have? Add a default clause to this statement. Or add
> > the field as nullable, populate with data and then alter to NOT NULL.
>
> I have tried to add field as nullable, then tried to alter to not null.
>
> UPDATE TMP_RPT SET ID1 = '5'; Commit;
> (This statement is OK)
>
> 25.05.2016 12:23, korkl...@yahoo.it [firebird-support] wrote:
>> where are the embedded packages for fb3?
>
> Not exists anymore. Read Release Notes about changes in server architecture.
While this is true, that people should first read the release notes, IMHO we
should make the transition
Hello Bill,
> Used IB 10 years ago. Porting an SQL Anywhere app to FB 2.5. Going well
> until I try to connect a client to the database - "database unavailable." I
> have shared the DB folder on my Windows 7 machine, can browse to it from a
> client machine (Win 10) and see Full Control
> In firebird is there an option to declare a parameter in a stored procedure
> as an IN/OUT. (like ORACLE server has)
> http://docs.oracle.com/cd/B28359_01/appdev.111/b28370/parameter_declaration.
> htm
>
>
>
>
>
> I want to send a parameter to a procedure, do some operation with it, and
>
> Hello 'stwizard',
>
> Thursday, May 12, 2016, 12:46:25 AM, you wrote:
>
>> Here is my simple Stored Procedure. It simply looks for any
>> address in the ADDRESS table that starts with ‘0 ‘ as in “0 SE
>> ADAMS ST” and COUNT(*) how many time it might have been used in
>> PER_ADDRESS and if
[snip]
>> Also the post_event behaves different than the old firebird, the
>> never changed mfc (c++) application gets it sometimes, in many cases
>> not. Only the version of firebird is changed.
>
> Post_event was not changed in Firebird 3. Are you sure that your
> customer's applications
> I try the ordinary EF CodeFirst test with latest packages for new FB3.
>
>
>
>targetFramework="net452" />
>targetFramework="net452" />
>
>
> -
>
> public class Blog
> {
> public int id{ get; set; }
> public string name { get; set;
Hi Jack,
> Hi Thomas
>
> I did a trace as you suggested.
> The slow SP shows these 3 consecutive statements showing a 20 min gap of
> no activity
>
> 2016-05-04T14:25:30.5020 (3268:061B51F8) EXECUTE_PROCEDURE_START
> C:\MAGUSDB\FBDB\SAMPLE1.FDB (ATT_45, SYSDBA:NONE, NONE, TCPv4:127.0.0.1)
>
> What are the possible reason for a SP that normally runs in approx 20 seconds
> then Occasionally takes 15 minutes, (or a method of trying to find the cause
> of
> the problem).
>
>
>
> Firebird Details
> Server Version: WI-V2.5.5.26952 Firebird 2.5 32 bit Superserver,
> CpuAffinityMask = 1
Hello Michael,
> Hi
>
> I have succesfully installed Firebird 3.0 on my home computer.
> I can use our program. We have 3 main programs. Two are using IBX component
> and
> the last uses IBObjects.
> On my local mashine it runs smoothly.
>
> I have then installed Firebird 3.0 alongside
Hi,
> This is the Query plan from SS FB 3.0
>
> PLAN (GET_STCK NATURAL)
>
> and here is the Query plan from SC FB 2.5.2
>
> PLAN (G_T3 NATURAL)(M_TT INDEX (RDB$PRIMARY2))(A INDEX (IDX_M_GD3))(A
> INDEX (IDX_M_GD3))SORT (JOIN (B INDEX (TM_D), A INDEX (T2_T1), C INDEX
> (RDB$PRIMARY25), D INDEX
Hi,
> 2016. 04. 28. 21:22 keltezéssel, Ann Harrison aharri...@ibphoenix.com
> [firebird-support] írta:
>> Okay... What's the requirement that keeps you from using generators?
>
> I need number generators which give back sequence numbers without
> skipping and repeating. But don't know how
> 2016. 04. 28. 14:55 keltezéssel, Dimitry Sibiryakov s...@ibphoenix.com
> [firebird-support] írta:
>> 28.04.2016 13:41, Gabor Boros gaborbo...@yahoo.com [firebird-support] wrote:
>>> The message is:
>>> deadlock
>>> update conflicts with concurrent update
>>> concurrent transaction number is ...
Hello Zoran,
>
> In FB 2.5 I am using
>
> insert into MyTable (col1, col2) values(val1, val2) returning Id
>
> where Id is autoinc column (sequence generator + before insert trigger).
>
> How do I do it in FB 3.0? It doesn’t like “returning Id”. It displays
> this error: SQLDA error. Wrong number
> Create a firebird 3 bd in another user who is not sysdba
> and create a role called sysdba without permission
> and when I try to connect from flamerobin you give me the following error
> message
>
> *** IBPP::SQLException ***
> Context: Database::Connect
> Message: isc_attach_database failed
>
Hello James,
> After FB 3.0 released, I am trying to immigrate my DB application to this new
> version.
>
>
> My DB app is running with embeded version before, so now I am still trying to
> get it work under embeded mode.
> I tried FB 3.0 x32, it works as embedded version well after I created a
> 2016. 04. 22. 15:57 keltezéssel, Gabor Boros gaborbo...@yahoo.com
> [firebird-support] írta:
>> 2016. 04. 22. 15:37 keltezéssel, Dimitry Sibiryakov s...@ibphoenix.com
>> [firebird-support] írta:
>>> 22.04.2016 15:34, Gabor Boros gaborbo...@yahoo.com [firebird-support] wrote:
Now tried to
Hi Neil,
> We are explicitly starting and committing our own transactions rather than
> relying on any auto-commit behaviour.
>
> We are running Classic (sorry I should have told you that already).
>
> I'll get our devs to checkout the MON$ tables and see what additional info
> can be gleaned
> Michael,
>
>> I have a testserver currently running both Firebird 2.1 and 2.5.
>> I need this to support and test various situations with different firebird
>> versions.
>>
>> Now I would like to install Firebird 3.0 manually as well, so I can have 2.1,
>> 2.5 and 3.0 on the same server.
>>
Michael,
> I have a testserver currently running both Firebird 2.1 and 2.5.
> I need this to support and test various situations with different firebird
> versions.
>
> Now I would like to install Firebird 3.0 manually as well, so I can have 2.1,
> 2.5 and 3.0 on the same server.
> 2.1 listens
Neil,
> We are investigating an issue with one of our systems where it gradually
> slows down during the course of a day.
>
> We have our epos system that we write ourselves using Delphi XE2 and
> the IBX components.
How does your transaction model/layer look like in your client
application
> On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 10:03 AM, 'Thomas Steinmaurer' t...@iblogmanager.com
> [firebird-support] <firebird-support@yahoogroups.com> wrote:
>
>> > On Thu, 14 Apr 2016 12:28:41 +0200 (CEST), 'Thomas Steinmaurer'
>> > t...@iblogmanager.com [firebird-support]
> On Thu, 14 Apr 2016 12:28:41 +0200 (CEST), 'Thomas Steinmaurer'
> t...@iblogmanager.com [firebird-support] <firebird-support@yahoogroups.com>
> wrote:
>>
>>
>> Yep. If one want to have some sort of client login/user available on
>> the server
Hi Olaf,
> Database "D:\INTERBASE\IFLS.GDB"
>
> Database header page information:
>
>Flags 0
>
>Generation 2939162
>
>System Change Number0
>
>Page size 4096
You might consider increasing to 8K, especially when
> Hello @ll,
>
>
>
> we are using firebird 3.0 RC2 and have some questions about open
> transactions. (Clients connect over odbc) The gstat output gives 7
> transactions between the oldest and the current transaction, if we look into
> the monitoring table, we see only 10 transactions. The
> On 14/04/2016 08:26, 'Thomas Steinmaurer' t...@iblogmanager.com
> [firebird-support] wrote:
>>
>> With a single user you basically can't distinguish people on the
>> server side through CURRENT_USER etc.
>>
> We use one Firebird user for the web server, and the
> Hello,
>
> Il 14/04/2016 09.26, 'Thomas Steinmaurer' t...@iblogmanager.com
> [firebird-support] ha scritto:
>>
>> I guess you mean with the same Firebird user name? Or are you using
>> Windows trusted authentication?
>>
>
> Oops, sorry. I m
> Hello,
> If a user try to connect from two or more PC with same username,
> Firebird accepts the connection but is safe without problems or is best
> to avoid like the pest?
I guess you mean with the same Firebird user name? Or are you using Windows
trusted authentication?
In general this
Hello Olaf,
'Checkmail' check_m...@satron.de [firebird-support] schrieb am 13.04.2016 14:38:
> Hello,
>
>
>
> I've a problem with our database, firebird 3.0 RC2, some Clients (C++,
> Microsoft Access over Firebird ODBC). There are 7 open transactions. But
> in the monitoring Table, I
> There is 77GB free out of 148GB at the minute and it has restored 9GB so
> far, final size ~33GB so on the surface looks adequate unless very large
> temp files are created when the indexes are reactivated?
Yes. This may happen, depending on the index size. Are you sure that
temp space is
Hi!
> gbak:activating and creating deferred index K_MERCURY_EMAIL
>
> gbak:cannot commit index K_MERCURY_EMAIL
>
> gbak: ERROR:operating system directive CreateFile failed
Any chance that you are running out of disk where your TEMP directory is
located?
--
With regards,
Thomas
Hi Patrick,
> Hi Thomas, nice to get a response from you. We already met in ~2010 in Linz at
> your office :)
> (ex. SEM GmbH, later Playmonitor GmbH)
I know. XING (Big Brother) is watching you. Nice to see that you are still
running with Firebird. ;-)
> First, sorry for posting a mixed state
> Thomas,
>>
>> I doubt, Firebird is IO-bound (limited by disk IO).
>>
>
> Sorry, I don't understand your comment, can you please clarify what you
> mean?
I think, disk IO isn't the limiting factor in that environment.
--
With regards,
Thomas Steinmaurer
http://www.upscene.com
Professional
> Hi Patrick,
>
> If you say that problem occurred recently, I would suggest you to check
> SAN disks health.
>
> However, these values
>
>>Average system IOPS under load read: 100
> >Average system IOPS under load write: 550
> >Backup Restore IOPS read: 1700
> >Backup Restore IOPS write: 250
Patrick,
> recently we had some strange performance issues with our Firebird DB server.
>
> On high load, our server started to slow down. Select and update SQL
> query times did go up by more than 500% on average,
>
> but reaching unreasonable high execution times at worst case. (several
>
> Dear all,
> If blocking SYSDBA from connecting the database is the goal, than ones can
> create a role with the name SYSDBA.Is there any minus about this?
AFAIR, this needs to be done with a direct system table insertion in RDB$ROLES
with 2.5 and earlier. I don't know if this has changed in
Hi,
> Dear all,
> Though I don't have the same question as Roland, information below by Virna
> Constantin (costel...@yahoo.com) is very useful.Thanks every one.
> Regards,Tjioe
>
> Suggestion
> event studies "on connect"
> 1. an application with minimum rights connects to the database
> 1 '. in
> Thanks for instructions. It does work.
>
>
>
> Is there a way to use created case insensitive collation as database wide
> default? It would be easier for me not to specify collation for each and
> every index definition.
http://www.firebirdsql.org/refdocs/langrefupd25-ddl-charset.html
This
Hi,
> What is the best way to go about to find out about this?
>
> I have several projects that are using the FB database and I would like
> to cleanup and remove all the indices that are just taking up space and
> thus indirectly reduces performance?
It is not that easy to clearly define the
> Hi,
> is this possible to disable cache at all?
> I mean that all go from and to “HDD” without RAM between.
Checkout the FileSystemCacheThreshold configuration parameter in
firebird.conf. Set it to 0 and also use a small page buffers value.
Another area of RAM usage is for temporary data used
Hi,
> Is it possible to temporarily disable a FK constraint? I have found a
> couple of requests for this feature dated 2009 but these still show as
> open. Did this functionality ever get implemented ?
No. As Alan said, currently the only way is to dropping and re-creating.
--
With
> Hi.
>
> Is it possible to create an index like
>
> CREATE INDEX MYINDEX_IDX1
> ON MYTABLE (COLUMN1 ASCENDING, COLUMN2 DESCENDING )
No. You can't define ordering per index segment.
--
With regards,
Thomas Steinmaurer
http://www.upscene.com
Professional Tools and Services for Firebird
FB
> Il 07/03/2016 11.32, Dimitry Sibiryakov s...@ibphoenix.com
> [firebird-support] ha scritto:
>> sum(saldo) over (order by data)
>
> Thank You for your response but I can't do: sum(SALDO) because SALDO is
> not a field of my table.
>
> I badly explained myself: I have a table with only this
> 07.03.2016 12:55, 'Thomas Steinmaurer' t...@iblogmanager.com
> [firebird-support] wrote:
>> Needless to say, 3.0 is in release candidate state. Not sure if Luigi wants
>> to run 3.0 in
>> production yet. ;-)
>
> Nothing prevents him from installing of a
> 07.03.2016 12:29, Luigi Siciliano luigi...@tiscalinet.it [firebird-support]
> wrote:
>> Ok, I understand but, "over" is unknow in firebird 2.5.5.
>
> Upgrade to 3.0.
Needless to say, 3.0 is in release candidate state. Not sure if Luigi wants to
run 3.0 in production yet. ;-)
--
With
> I have a state machine (workflow) implemented on a table a couple of
> million records and growing.
> I have crated an index on the "state" field. The possible states are
> very few (5 to 10). Obviously selectivity index is terrible. As I can
> optimize the query?
Hard to say without seeing an
Hi!
> Dear Friends.
>
> FirebirdSQL: 2.5.5 64bits
> Operating System: Windows 2008 R2 Enterprise 64bits
> Server: Dell Poweredge R620
> 32GB
> 2 processors E5-2609 2.40 GHz
>
> On 17-1-2016 00:07, Köditz, Martin martin.koed...@it-syn.de
> [firebird-support] wrote:
>> is there still a reason to use the Classic mode with Firebird 3? Since
>> there is real SMP support with SuperServer I don’t think there can be
>> advantages with ClassicServer.
>
> The main advantage of
> Hallo,
>
> Il 08/01/2016 16.22, Tim Ward t...@telensa.com [firebird-support] ha scritto:
>> What are your queries, query plans, query statistics?
>
> The queries are similar to: SELECT * FROM TABLE.
>
> Investigating for query plans, statistics, Buffers as suggested by
> Thomas, I discovered the
> Thanks. For some Years, we have had in use the superserver, but since we
> have a quadcore CPU, we are using cs.
>
> UDFs can I replace with build in functions
I guess you can imagine that you first need to do that before backing up
and restoring?
> Now, I have restored the database with 2.5,
Hello Olaf,
> Hello,
>
> I plan an update of firebird 2.1 cs 32 Bit with 32 Bit Server OS to
> Firebird 2.5. Is there a 64 Bit OS recommend and a 64 Bit installation
> of Firebird too?
From an operational POV, a main factor with moving from 32-bit to
64-bit is if you are using (third-party)
Hello,
> Hallo,
> I have a small database (less 100MB) that works on Firebird 2.5.5
> SS64bit over a machine with Win7 64bit with 4GB Ram, CPU Pentium G620.
>
> I seems to work very well in local but with the 3 clients on LAN works
> very bad. It is very very slow to open and navigate a
> Yes, Thomas,
>
> it woks with 2.1. In the release notes of 2.5.X is written:
>
> Adding a value to a timestamp earlier than '16.11.1858 00:00:01' would throw
> the error "value exceeds the range for valid timestamp".
>
> But where can I search 200 Tables...
Read Paul's blog on using -v for the
> now, the switches works fine, I had forget the Charset -fix_fss_d ISO8859_1
>
> It works fine, but there is another problem to fix. Now I get the error,
> that value exceeds the range for valid timestamps. How can I fix this issue?
* When does that happen during the restore?
* Does a backup
>> I downloaded FB 2.5.5 from firebirdsql and my Microsoft Essentials
>> detected it as a malware.
>
> I am facing the same problem.
> The following file is affected:
> http://sourceforge.net/projects/firebird/files/firebird-win64/2.5.5-Release/Firebird-2.5.5.26952_0_x64.exe/download
>
> This
Hello,
Executing the following in both, dialect 1 and 3:
select cast(current_timestamp as varchar(30))from rdb$database
results in a string with a different date/time format. At least on
Windows with Firebird 2.5 64-bit.
Dialect 1: 7-DEC-2015 20:29:12.3820
Dialect 3: 2015-12-07 20:31:07.2280
> On 8-12-2015 09:52, Thomas Steinmaurer t...@iblogmanager.com
> [firebird-support] wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> Executing the following in both, dialect 1 and 3:
>>
>> select cast(current_timestamp as varchar(30))from rdb$database
>>
>>
>> results i
> Monday, November 30, 2015, 7:40:50 PM, Thomas Steinmaurer wrote:
>
>> That information is also available on the database header page,
>> which can be extracted by gstat -h
>
> Unfortunately, that information is absent from gstat -h, hence my
> advice to use isql SHOW DATABASE. I can't think why
rgilland1...@gmail.com [firebird-support] schrieb am 30.11.2015 05:10:
> Thanks Helen,
>
> I finally taught myself how to use isql.exe in order to access this
> information.
> What a strange tool.
>
>
> Then I found that both IBOConsole.exe and Upscene's Database Workbench show
> this
rgilland1...@gmail.com [firebird-support] schrieb am 27.11.2015 00:24:
> Hi,
>
>
> this is an output from ibexpert, no usage% column here either:
>
>
> Kind Regards,
>
>
> Robert.
>
>
> Database "OP.FDB"
> Database header page information:
> Flags 0
>
> Hi Robert, you can do this easily with a tool such as IBExpert. Just run
> Services / Database Statistics and this is the result:
>
> TableName SizeUsage%
> CUSTOMER 11,960,320 0.295
> PARAMFIL 16,384 1 0.000
>
> In response to your questions:
>
> What are the implications of holding a connection to the database open
> forever (and running millions and millions of tiny transactions flat out
> through that connection)?
>
> What difference would it make if we dropped the connection periodically?
>
> We had
> you should identity this long running transaction. if you use fb2.5 than
> this is simple by mon$TRANSACTIONS table
MON$ tables are even in Firebird 2.1.
--
With regards,
Thomas Steinmaurer
http://www.upscene.com/
Professional Tools and Services for Firebird
FB TraceManager, IB LogManager,
'Louis van Alphen' lo...@nucleo.co.za [firebird-support] schrieb am 14.10.2015
10:09:
> I think a tool like FBTraceManager from Thomas (Upscene) can do that for you
Unfortunately not. The Trace API does not provide that level of granularity for
PSQL code modules.
This has been a long
> Hello Team,
>
> A few days back, I posted a message regarding 'Firebird BLR 623 invalid
> request - LRTRIM is not defined -
> module name or entrypoint could not be found' when I ran some stored
> procedures that used either LTRIM
> or LRTRIM functions (occasionally,though not always).
>
>
1 - 100 of 173 matches
Mail list logo
