1.18.3
What version of PowerSDR are you using?
-Tim
-Original Message-
From: flexradio-boun...@flex-radio.biz
[mailto:flexradio-boun...@flex-radio.biz] On Behalf Of Sergey Abramov
Sent: Thursday, November 26, 2009 4:40 PM
To: Dave
Cc: FlexRadio
Subject: Re: [Flexradio] Flex SDR
Sorry, I really mistaken.
Indeed beside me W7 32-bit
Sergey,
Also, confirming you are using 64 bit version?
Thanks
Dave
wo2x
--
From: Tim Ellison telli...@itsco.com
Sent: Thursday, November 26, 2009 5:22 PM
To: Sergey Abramov
Ah, ruining the panel. That brings back memories of 1958 when the
railroad brought my new 102 inch CB whip to me along with a nice big
mount and spring. In those days I had no way to cut a hole in the
deck of my 1958 ford so I went to the dealer and asked that he do it.
He protested that
I'm hearing rumours of higher cpu loading running PB. Is there more
going on here than just a pretty face? Like you I would prefer to stick
to the classic interface, particularly if ver.2 has any impact on the
operating performance of the radio.
Kirb - VE6IV
Message: 1
Date: Thu, 26 Nov
To all,
As per FlexRadio Systems request, all discussions regarding beta and
experimental software should not be posted on this reflector. Version
2.0 of PowerSDR has not been released and is still in the
beta/experimental stages of development.
Therefore, in the future, topics that
Does the V/U module utilize the same ANT1-3 RX1 IN/OUT RX2 IN ports? Or
in other words, does it follow the same rules/settings that the main
receiver or second receiver follow for antenna rx/tx selection?
--
73's
N7BCP
___
FlexRadio Systems Mailing
No it doesn't use the ANT 1-3 ports. I am not sure about the RX ports. I am
waiting on an antenna port configuration matrix for the V/U module so that it
can be published in the Knowledge Base.
-Tim
-Original Message-
From: flexradio-boun...@flex-radio.biz
On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 10:13 AM, knesbitt k.nesb...@shaw.ca wrote:
I'm hearing rumours of higher cpu loading running PB. Is there more going on
here than just a pretty face? Like you I would prefer to stick to the
classic interface, particularly if ver.2 has any impact on the operating
I have had no performance issues running the latest SVN of PB-PAL.
Bill
AB4BJ
http://www.ab4bj.com
-Original Message-
From: flexradio-boun...@flex-radio.biz
[mailto:flexradio-boun...@flex-radio.biz] On Behalf Of knesbitt
Sent: Friday, November 27, 2009 1:14 PM
To:
As a new owner of the Flex 3000 and a former owner of the 2nd SDR1000 in
Australia, I was most disappointed to see the GUI had not moved on from
that clinical Windows look.
I installed PB and was instantly pleased that it had progressed somewhat.
However when you look at the beautiful job that
On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 7:00 PM, Keith Bainbridge vk...@arach.net.au wrote:
I installed PB and was instantly pleased that it had progressed somewhat.
However when you look at the beautiful job that SDRMAX III and to a lesser
extent SDRMAX II does for the QS1R it appears Powersdr still has quite
Deep Impact is not secret. The Knowledge Base is for the dissemination of
information about released products. You will not find information about beta
or experimental software located there.
You will find some basic information about it on the FlexRadio Systems FAQ web
page
Brian Lloyd wrote:
On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 7:00 PM, Keith Bainbridge vk...@arach.net.au wrote:
I installed PB and was instantly pleased that it had progressed somewhat.
However when you look at the beautiful job that SDRMAX III and to a lesser
extent SDRMAX II does for the QS1R it appears
13 matches
Mail list logo
