Subject: Re: [fonc] Any newer FoNC distribution ?
Yes, I have looked through that. I am referring specifically to the
DBJr project, and related code or projects (LBox, Lesserphic2, your
Text Field rules system, etc.). I see Nile/Gezira out there, but
nothing specific to DBJr, although maybe I
From: Kevin DeGraaf ke...@degraaf-consulting.com
To: Fundamentals of New Computing fonc@vpri.org
Sent: Sat, May 8, 2010 2:44:42 PM
Subject: Re: [fonc] Any newer FoNC distribution ?
So can I correctly infer from your comment that they haven't been
published externally yet? I
,
Alan
-
From: brian ford bri...@gmail.com
To: Fundamentals of New Computing fonc@vpri.org
Sent: Sat, May 8, 2010 3:29:23 PM
Subject: Re: [fonc] Any newer FoNC distribution ?
Hi Alan,
On Sat, May 8, 2010 at 3:03 PM, Alan Kay alan.n...@yahoo.com wrote:
I'm happy that you
And I've suggested a very good process for the community to force
Cheers,
Alan
From: Kevin DeGraaf ke...@degraaf-consulting.com
To: Fundamentals of New Computing fonc@vpri.org
Sent: Sat, May 8, 2010 5:04:46 PM
Subject: Re: [fonc] Any newer FoNC distribution
Thanks, the script did generate the necessary directory, etc. However
the make failed with:
gcc -DPACKAGE_NAME=\gc\ -DPACKAGE_TARNAME=\gc\
-DPACKAGE_VERSION=\7.0\ -DPACKAGE_STRING=\gc 7.0\
-DPACKAGE_BUGREPORT=\hans.bo...@hp.com\ -DGC_VERSION_MAJOR=7
-DGC_VERSION_MINOR=0 -DPACKAGE=\gc\
,
Alan
From: Carl Gundel ca...@psychesystems.com
To: Fundamentals of New Computing fonc@vpri.org
Sent: Thu, May 6, 2010 10:40:38 AM
Subject: RE: [fonc] Any newer FoNC distribution ?
Hi Alan!
That’s great. Do you post these somewhere? I’d love to read the latest
one.
-Carl
From: fonc
Yes, I have looked through that. I am referring specifically to the
DBJr project, and related code or projects (LBox, Lesserphic2, your
Text Field rules system, etc.). I see Nile/Gezira out there, but
nothing specific to DBJr, although maybe I am just not looking in the
right place. Thanks,
Thanks, will try.
TCP Time support are what I am looking for at present, will try
earlier versions if necessary.
David
On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 11:20 AM, Kevin Kelley ke...@kelleysoft.com wrote:
The Boehm collector's got all kinds of tweaks and notes about different
build
configs; it more than
: Re: [fonc] Any newer FoNC distribution ?
Yes, I have looked through that. I am referring specifically to the
DBJr project, and related code or projects (LBox, Lesserphic2, your
Text Field rules system, etc.). I see Nile/Gezira out there, but
nothing specific to DBJr, although maybe I am just
Is there any newer FoNC distribution than what is available at
http://piumarta.com/software/cola/ ?
This seems to be Sep 2008 vintage?
But still very interesting, thanks,
David
___
fonc mailing list
fonc@vpri.org
-
From: fonc-boun...@vpri.org [mailto:fonc-boun...@vpri.org] On Behalf Of
Kevin Kelley
Sent: Thursday, May 06, 2010 12:04 PM
To: Fundamentals of New Computing
Subject: Re: [fonc] Any newer FoNC distribution ?
On Thu, 06 May 2010, David Girle davidgi...@gmail.com wrote:
Is there any newer FoNC
://www.vpri.org/html/writings.php
Cheers,
Alan
From: Carl Gundel ca...@psychesystems.com
To: Fundamentals of New Computing fonc@vpri.org
Sent: Thu, May 6, 2010 10:40:38 AM
Subject: RE: [fonc] Any newer FoNC distribution ?
Hi Alan!
That’s great. Do you post these somewhere? I’d love to read the
latest
Thanks.
I had previously successfully made the ~sep 2008 build.
When I attempted to compile the 648 trunk under Ubuntu 9.1, things
seemed to fail at:
1) Maybe a missing directory ./libatomic_ops/src ?
gcc -DPACKAGE_NAME=\gc\ -DPACKAGE_TARNAME=\gc\
-DPACKAGE_VERSION=\7.0\
Your garbage collector didn't build; look in idst/object/gc-7.0 for a
configure-atomic-ops.sh script, run that, then make again.
Cheers,
Kevin Kelley
On Thu, 06 May 2010 22:34:29 -0500, David Girle davidgi...@gmail.com
wrote:
Thanks.
I had previously successfully made the ~sep 2008 build.
14 matches
Mail list logo
