I finally have Knuth's Digital Typography and let myself enlighten by
his well-written words. In [1] Simon outlined different strategies for
page-breaking, obviously closely following the different approaches
defined by Knuth. At first glance, I'd say that best-fit is probably
the obvious strategy
To speed things up could we hold a conference (using Skype, for example)
to discuss further details on page-breaking? I'd volunteer to sum up any
results during that discussion for the archives. I have Finn on my Skype
radar already.
Jeremias Maerki
Victor and Jeremias, thanks for your Inputs.
Victor, I've checked out your aXSL. I'll study it and come back to you
if I have questions.
Jeremias wrote:
Speaking of startVParea(), could we rename it to something more meanigfull?
Proposition: TransformPosition, or something like this.
I would be please to listen.
Renaud
Jeremias Maerki wrote:
processing time and additional memory requirements. This
leads me to the question if we shouldn't actually implement
two page-breaking strategies (in the end, not both right
now). For a speed-optimized algorithm, we could even think
about ignoring side-floats.
Simon, I've tried to think your example through. If I read the spec
right about space resolution then I get the impression that we may need
to do more in this area than find a suitable box/glue/penalty
combination. There may be several spaces which need to be taken into
account during resolution.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33597.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
On Tue, Mar 01, 2005 at 03:09:46PM +0100, Jeremias Maerki wrote:
To speed things up could we hold a conference (using Skype, for example)
to discuss further details on page-breaking? I'd volunteer to sum up any
results during that discussion for the archives. I have Finn on my Skype
radar
On Tue, Mar 01, 2005 at 03:02:38PM +0100, Jeremias Maerki wrote:
As for the plan to implement a new page-breaking mechanism: I've got to
do it now. :-) I'm sorry if this may put some pressure on some of you.
I'm also not sure if I'm fit already to tackle it, but I've got to
do it anyway. Since
On Tue, Mar 01, 2005 at 07:52:27AM -0700, Victor Mote wrote:
Jeremias Maerki wrote:
processing time and additional memory requirements. This
leads me to the question if we shouldn't actually implement
two page-breaking strategies (in the end, not both right
now). For a
On 01.03.2005 22:25:12 Simon Pepping wrote:
On Tue, Mar 01, 2005 at 07:52:27AM -0700, Victor Mote wrote:
Jeremias Maerki wrote:
processing time and additional memory requirements. This
leads me to the question if we shouldn't actually implement
two page-breaking strategies (in
I'd be happy to 'participate' although I don't have a skype acct yet. I
don't know what I can offer, but I'm here to help!
Cheers!
On Mar 1, 2005, at 2:31 PM, Jeremias Maerki wrote:
Maybe I could hook you into a Skype conference by using SkypeOut. It's
pretty
cheap to call to the Netherlands.
OH!!! lightBulb state=on wattage=25/
Yes, you're right, Chris--now I see the issue. I
implemented validation for about 80% of the FOs, but
80% is not 100%. fo:table-body never had any
validation implemented, hence the NPE's that were
occurring.
Sorry, Jeremias, I thought you had just
13 matches
Mail list logo
