Re: [fossil-users] do I need a fossil server?

2011-03-15 Thread Ron Wilson
On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 5:40 PM, tr...@tekwissusa.com wrote: Ok, I see. So having individual repositories is the better approach. What about having a server vs just a file ? e.g fossil clone //server/repo.fossil repo.fossil vs. fossil clone http://server/repo:8080 repo.fossil With a small

Re: [fossil-users] do I need a fossil server?

2011-03-14 Thread Federico Ramallo
I'm rather new to fossil, but I've been using different VCS for almost 10 years. I strongly recommend having a copy of the repository on each station. Considering that disk space is cheap and the repo is small, maybe less than 100M. Furthermore you don't have a single point of failure on several

Re: [fossil-users] do I need a fossil server?

2011-03-14 Thread Ron Wilson
On Sun, Mar 13, 2011 at 5:46 PM, tr...@tekwissusa.com wrote: I’d like to setup fossil for a very small in-house team (1 to 3 people). There’s no need ever for having outside access, everything is private, firewalled and trusted. So I was wondering if I can create a repository on a file

[fossil-users] do I need a fossil server?

2011-03-13 Thread trash
Hi, I have a general question about fossil and maybe even scm. I’d like to setup fossil for a very small in-house team (1 to 3 people). There’s no need ever for having outside access, everything is private, firewalled and trusted. So I was wondering if I can create a repository on a file

Re: [fossil-users] do I need a fossil server?

2011-03-13 Thread Richard Hipp
On Sun, Mar 13, 2011 at 5:46 PM, tr...@tekwissusa.com wrote: Hi, I have a general question about fossil and maybe even scm. I’d like to setup fossil for a very small in-house team (1 to 3 people). There’s no need ever for having outside access, everything is private, firewalled and