Xin LI wrote:
Finally I caught the issue for thunderbird. It was due to the
difference between our floating point handling and Linux's counterpart.
~ The patch attached would fix the problem at thunderbird part.
Thanks Xin.
Unfortunately enigmail plugin compiled with gcc 4.x as shipped with
Aryeh Friedman wrote:
I can confirm on 8-CURRENT no combination of GCC/enigmail/thinderbird
works... don't know about 7
Have you recompiled thunderbird with the new patch before sending this
message? And no combination doesn't mean anything, be specific on your
platform and gcc compiler for
I can confirm on 8-CURRENT no combination of GCC/enigmail/thinderbird
works... don't know about 7
On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 2:15 AM, Alex Dupre [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Xin LI wrote:
Finally I caught the issue for thunderbird. It was due to the
difference between our floating point handling
Alex Dupre wrote:
Aryeh Friedman wrote:
I can confirm on 8-CURRENT no combination of GCC/enigmail/thinderbird
works... don't know about 7
Have you recompiled thunderbird with the new patch before sending this
message? And no combination doesn't mean anything, be specific on your
Aryeh M. Friedman wrote:
Alex Dupre wrote:
Aryeh Friedman wrote:
I can confirm on 8-CURRENT no combination of GCC/enigmail/thinderbird
works... don't know about 7
Have you recompiled thunderbird with the new patch before sending this
message? And no combination doesn't mean anything,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Alex Dupre wrote:
| Xin LI wrote:
| Finally I caught the issue for thunderbird. It was due to the
| difference between our floating point handling and Linux's counterpart.
| ~ The patch attached would fix the problem at thunderbird part.
|
| Thanks
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Aryeh M. Friedman wrote:
| Aryeh M. Friedman wrote:
| Alex Dupre wrote:
| Aryeh Friedman wrote:
|
| I can confirm on 8-CURRENT no combination of GCC/enigmail/thinderbird
| works... don't know about 7
|
|
| Have you recompiled thunderbird with the new
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Alex Dupre wrote:
| So you confirm me that the only broken combination is FreeBSD 7 + amd64
| and the fix is to compile only enigmail with gcc 3.4, right?
Ah, to be more exact, I have *only* tested on FreeBSD 8+amd64:
thunderbird is compiled with
Quoting Mikhail Teterin [EMAIL PROTECTED] (from Mon, 21
Apr 2008 13:00:39 -0400 (EDT)):
the move of the place where the include directories are put breaks
some configure scripts. Namely those which only have the possibility
to specify the install prefix of the ImageMagick port. Those scripts
Xin LI wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Aryeh M. Friedman wrote:
| Aryeh M. Friedman wrote:
| Alex Dupre wrote:
| Aryeh Friedman wrote:
|
| I can confirm on 8-CURRENT no combination of
GCC/enigmail/thinderbird
| works... don't know about 7
|
|
| Have you recompiled
Aryeh M. Friedman ha scritto:
Would you please show me output from 'ident
/usr/ports/mail/thunderbird/Makefile'?
$FreeBSD: ports/mail/thunderbird/Makefile,v 1.90 2008/04/19 17:51:46
miwi Exp $
So, or you have manually applied the patch, or you don't have the latest
fixed thunderbird
On вівторок 22 квітень 2008, Alexander Leidinger wrote:
= It may be a good
= idea to mention the change of the include path in UPDATING or CHANGES...
I did mention it in the e-mail to all maintainer of the depending ports... No
one noticed :-)
-mi
On Mon, Apr 21, 2008 at 03:38:12PM +, Christian Weisgerber wrote:
Edwin Groothuis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Seems that isakmpd (security/isakmpd) is outdated. I'm currently using
it in my production environment. I would like to know does somebody
working on bring isakmpd back
Alex Dupre wrote:
Aryeh M. Friedman ha scritto:
Would you please show me output from 'ident
/usr/ports/mail/thunderbird/Makefile'?
$FreeBSD: ports/mail/thunderbird/Makefile,v 1.90 2008/04/19
17:51:46 miwi Exp $
So, or you have manually applied the patch, or you don't have the
latest
Aryeh M. Friedman ha scritto:
That makes zero sense because I did a csup immediatly before the recompile
The mirrors are not synced in real-time with master repos. Re-csup and
be sure to have the 1.91 revision.
--
Alex Dupre
___
This distfile is no longer available. I see references on gnats for newer
versions. Is this because I'm using 6.2-RELEASE?
Thanks,
-Clint
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To
On Mon, Apr 21, 2008 at 02:42:24PM -0500, Brooks Davis wrote:
That's well hidden (DOC/lzam.txt in the tarball). Someone
should produce some sort of lzma-lite distribution that only
does the basics. Then this could be a practical option.
Unfortunately, a closer look dispelled the hope. The
On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 11:34 AM, Andrew Pantyukhin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Apr 21, 2008 at 02:42:24PM -0500, Brooks Davis wrote:
That's well hidden (DOC/lzam.txt in the tarball). Someone
should produce some sort of lzma-lite distribution that only
does the basics. Then this
On Mon, 2008-04-21 at 15:05 -0700, Xin LI wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi, Coleman,
Finally I caught the issue for thunderbird. It was due to the
difference between our floating point handling and Linux's counterpart.
~ The patch attached would fix the problem at
On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 08:57:08AM -0500, Brooks Davis wrote:
On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 02:34:39PM +0400, Andrew Pantyukhin wrote:
On Mon, Apr 21, 2008 at 02:42:24PM -0500, Brooks Davis wrote:
That's well hidden (DOC/lzam.txt in the tarball). Someone
should produce some sort of lzma-lite
вівторок 22 квітень 2008 06:34 до, Andrew Pantyukhin Ви написали:
So I guess we'll have to stick to using lzma from ports for now.
Well, we lived with bzip2 from ports for quite a while...
The real problem with lzma right now is that lzmautils (already marked as
incompatible with lzma)
On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 10:21:45AM -0400, Mikhail Teterin wrote:
вівторок 22 квітень 2008 06:34 до, Andrew Pantyukhin Ви написали:
So I guess we'll have to stick to using lzma from ports for now.
Well, we lived with bzip2 from ports for quite a while...
The real problem with lzma right
вівторок 22 квітень 2008 11:00 до, Andrew Pantyukhin Ви написали:
Also, the lzmautils website claims it's of alpha-quality, so I'm
also hesitant to rely on it completely. At any rate, I think
having a reference implementation of lzma util in ports is a good
thing. OTOH, changing lzmautils'
Chris Maness
(909) 223-9179
http://www.chrismaness.com
On Tue, 22 Apr 2008, Diane Bruce wrote:
On Mon, Apr 21, 2008 at 06:39:46PM -0700, Chris Maness wrote:
Hello, Diane,
I am having trouble getting fldigi to compile. Also, the binary install
core dumps (signal 11) on two different FreeBSD
Here is what I got after rebuilding.
Chris Maness KQ6UP
(909) 223-9179
http://www.chrismaness.com
Version information:
fldigi 2.10
System: FreeBSD muon.kq6up.org 7.0-RELEASE FreeBSD 7.0-RELEASE #0: Sun Feb
24
19:59:52 UTC 2008
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC
i386
Built on
On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 10:33:37AM -0700, Chris Maness wrote:
Here is what I got after rebuilding.
...
Hamlib version 1.2.6.1
PortAudio V19-devel 1899
libsndfile-1.0.17
Abort trap: 6 (core dumped)
At this point, it sounds like a hardware problem. Check your RAM.
- 73 Diane VA3DB
--
-
Chris Maness
(909) 223-9179
http://www.chrismaness.com
On Tue, 22 Apr 2008, Diane Bruce wrote:
On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 10:33:37AM -0700, Chris Maness wrote:
Here is what I got after rebuilding.
...
Hamlib version 1.2.6.1
PortAudio V19-devel 1899
libsndfile-1.0.17
Abort trap: 6 (core
Chris Maness
(909) 223-9179
http://www.chrismaness.com
On Tue, 22 Apr 2008, Diane Bruce wrote:
On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 10:33:37AM -0700, Chris Maness wrote:
Here is what I got after rebuilding.
...
Hamlib version 1.2.6.1
PortAudio V19-devel 1899
libsndfile-1.0.17
Abort trap: 6 (core
Mikhail Teterin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The real problem with lzma right now is that lzmautils (already marked as
incompatible with lzma) installs its own lzma executable, with incompatible
command-line arguments :-(
I would have preferred for what is now lzmautils to actually replace
the
I am pasting modified script to use KDE3.5.8 in the hope of it being
usefull, the original being at the link indicated below
---ruby-qt-kde.share begins here ---
# This is a shell archive. Save it in a file, remove anything before
# this line, and then unpack it by entering sh file. Note, it
Hello,
was searching for Ruby-KDE bindings and found this
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports-bugs/2006-March/081655.html
but there is nothing such in latest ports!! comments ?
Masoom Shaikh
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
Andriy Gapon píše v út 22. 04. 2008 v 22:41 +0300:
Sorry if this is something obvious or a FAQ.
Is there a tool for purely package-based management of third-party software?
That is, something that meets the following criteria:
1. doesn't require ports tree
2. works similarly to package
On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 09:31:22AM -0400, Mikhail Teterin wrote:
It is trying to build JDK-1.5 using 1.4.2 and failing. I would've recommended
installing linux-sun-jdk15, but that will not work any more either:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=122513
You have to use
I wonder if someone has a work around for this, I have been unable to
use my web java apps in FreeBSD 7.0 they worked fine in PC-BSD 1.4
(FreeBSD 6.2)
thank you for your help
Sam Fourman Jr.
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
34 matches
Mail list logo
