Re: portupgrade fails to upgrade the package because the older version is installed

2008-07-14 Thread Sergey Matveychuk
Andriy Gapon wrote: on 12/07/2008 01:01 Sergey Matveychuk said the following: Andriy Gapon wrote: on 10/07/2008 11:18 Yuri said the following: David Southwell wrote: Did you follow the instructions in UPDATING (see below)? They may have some bearing on the problem.

Re: portupgrade fails to upgrade the package because the older version is installed

2008-07-14 Thread Andriy Gapon
on 14/07/2008 14:57 Sergey Matveychuk said the following: Andriy Gapon wrote: on 14/07/2008 14:32 Sergey Matveychuk said the following: This command works: # portupgrade -o www/neon28 neon26 I'll fix UPDATING entry. Is the reverse operation supposed to work? $ pkg_glob neon\*

Re: portupgrade fails to upgrade the package because the older version is installed

2008-07-14 Thread Sergey Matveychuk
Andriy Gapon wrote: on 14/07/2008 14:57 Sergey Matveychuk said the following: Andriy Gapon wrote: on 14/07/2008 14:32 Sergey Matveychuk said the following: This command works: # portupgrade -o www/neon28 neon26 I'll fix UPDATING entry. Is the reverse operation supposed to work? $ pkg_glob

Re: portupgrade fails to upgrade the package because the older version is installed

2008-07-14 Thread Andriy Gapon
on 14/07/2008 15:18 Sergey Matveychuk said the following: version 2.8 is alway than 2.6. So you must use -f option here: portupgrade -fo www/neon26 neon28 portupgrade will no update ports on older version if you did not force it. yes, -f does the job, thanks! But, on the other hand,

Re: portupgrade fails to upgrade the package because the older version is installed

2008-07-14 Thread Yuri Pankov
On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 02:46:02PM +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote: on 14/07/2008 14:32 Sergey Matveychuk said the following: This command works: # portupgrade -o www/neon28 neon26 I'll fix UPDATING entry. Is the reverse operation supposed to work? $ pkg_glob neon\* neon28-0.28.2_1

Re: portupgrade fails to upgrade the package because the older version is installed

2008-07-14 Thread Sergey Matveychuk
Andriy Gapon wrote: on 14/07/2008 15:18 Sergey Matveychuk said the following: version 2.8 is alway than 2.6. So you must use -f option here: portupgrade -fo www/neon26 neon28 portupgrade will no update ports on older version if you did not force it. yes, -f does the job, thanks! But, on

Re: portupgrade fails to upgrade the package because the older version is installed

2008-07-13 Thread Andriy Gapon
on 12/07/2008 01:01 Sergey Matveychuk said the following: Andriy Gapon wrote: on 10/07/2008 11:18 Yuri said the following: David Southwell wrote: Did you follow the instructions in UPDATING (see below)? They may have some bearing on the problem. 20080701: AFFECTS:

Re: portupgrade fails to upgrade the package because the older version is installed

2008-07-11 Thread Andriy Gapon
on 10/07/2008 11:18 Yuri said the following: David Southwell wrote: Did you follow the instructions in UPDATING (see below)? They may have some bearing on the problem. 20080701: AFFECTS: users of devel/subversion* AUTHOR: Lev Serebryakov [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: portupgrade fails to upgrade the package because the older version is installed

2008-07-11 Thread Sergey Matveychuk
Yuri wrote: I got the error below during portupgrade -aP. Why wouldn't portupgrade just upgrade neon? 'pkgdb -F' doesn;t find any problems. Yuri === Installing for neon28-0.28.2_1 === neon28-0.28.2_1 conflicts with installed package(s): neon26-0.26.4_1 They install files into

Re: portupgrade fails to upgrade the package because the older version is installed

2008-07-11 Thread Sergey Matveychuk
Andriy Gapon wrote: on 10/07/2008 11:18 Yuri said the following: David Southwell wrote: Did you follow the instructions in UPDATING (see below)? They may have some bearing on the problem. 20080701: AFFECTS: users of devel/subversion* AUTHOR: Lev Serebryakov [EMAIL

Re: portupgrade fails to upgrade the package because the older version is installed

2008-07-10 Thread Yuri
David Southwell wrote: Did you follow the instructions in UPDATING (see below)? They may have some bearing on the problem. 20080701: AFFECTS: users of devel/subversion* AUTHOR: Lev Serebryakov [EMAIL PROTECTED] subversion now uses neon-0.28.x (www/neon28) port,

Re: portupgrade fails to upgrade the package because the older version is installed

2008-07-10 Thread Michael A. Loginov
And what about deinstall neon26 and install neon28 instead? David Southwell wrote: Did you follow the instructions in UPDATING (see below)? They may have some bearing on the problem. 20080701: AFFECTS: users of devel/subversion* AUTHOR: Lev Serebryakov [EMAIL

Re: portupgrade fails to upgrade the package because the older version is installed

2008-07-10 Thread Michael A. Loginov
And what about deinstall neon26 and install neon28 instead? David Southwell wrote: Did you follow the instructions in UPDATING (see below)? They may have some bearing on the problem. 20080701: AFFECTS: users of devel/subversion* AUTHOR: Lev Serebryakov [EMAIL

portupgrade fails to upgrade the package because the older version is installed

2008-07-09 Thread Yuri
I got the error below during portupgrade -aP. Why wouldn't portupgrade just upgrade neon? 'pkgdb -F' doesn;t find any problems. Yuri === Installing for neon28-0.28.2_1 === neon28-0.28.2_1 conflicts with installed package(s): neon26-0.26.4_1 They install files into the same

Re: portupgrade fails to upgrade the package because the older version is installed

2008-07-09 Thread David Southwell
On Wednesday 09 July 2008 15:09:25 Yuri wrote: I got the error below during portupgrade -aP. Why wouldn't portupgrade just upgrade neon? 'pkgdb -F' doesn;t find any problems. Yuri === Installing for neon28-0.28.2_1 === neon28-0.28.2_1 conflicts with installed package(s):