On Mon, Jun 04, 2012 at 09:53:11PM -0700, Gary Kline wrote:
Subject: Re: how do I fix this?
To: FreeBSD freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.8.0 (GTK+ 2.24.6; amd64-portbld-freebsd8.3)
On Mon, 4 Jun 2012 14:43:08 -0700
Gary Kline articulated:
from portupgrade, I
On 06/04/12 15:25, Warren Block wrote:
On Mon, 4 Jun 2012, Gary Aitken wrote:
What part of the Handbook? I would suggest using gpart(8), it makes GPT
partitions easy, and nasty old MBR partitions aren't any worse than with
fdisk/bsdlabel.
19.3.2
That's the Storage chapter, section
On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 9:37 PM, Matthew Seaman matt...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 04/06/2012 14:47, Rada alive wrote:
[root@pladaks /usr/ports/dns/unbound]# make all-depends-list
/usr/ports/devel/gmake
/usr/ports/textproc/expat2
/usr/ports/dns/ldns
/usr/ports/devel/gettext
On 04/06/2012 20:37, Matthew Seaman wrote:
On 04/06/2012 14:47, Rada alive wrote:
[root@pladaks /usr/ports/dns/unbound]# make all-depends-list
/usr/ports/devel/gmake
/usr/ports/textproc/expat2
/usr/ports/dns/ldns
/usr/ports/devel/gettext
/usr/ports/devel/doxygen
/usr/ports/devel/libtool
whats wrong in juz using bsdlabel ?
On Tue, 5 Jun 2012, Gary Aitken wrote:
On 06/04/12 15:25, Warren Block wrote:
On Mon, 4 Jun 2012, Gary Aitken wrote:
What part of the Handbook? I would suggest using gpart(8), it makes GPT
partitions easy, and nasty old MBR partitions aren't any worse
On 06/05/2012 10:45, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
whats wrong in juz using bsdlabel ?
from the 9.0R release notes:
3.2.6 Disk Partition Management Utilities
In earlier releases various utilities were available to manage disk
partition information. They are deprecated in favor of the
Hi,
I was just reviewing your website and found it very interesting.
I really like your website and services you are providing. I was wondering if
we can work with you and help you with your business.
I would like to offer you our Hire Developer/Programmer service where
you can hire our
Hi,
I am new to FreeBSD, decided to migrate a web server to FreeBSD. I
recently both a VPS that claim to use KVM as a virtualization service, I
don't know the details of the real hardware running behind nor what is
KVM running on. Anyway I have an issue with clock on my FreeBSD
installation that
Given this script:
#!/bin/sh
foo=
while read line
do
foo=$foo -e
done
echo $foo
Say I respond 3 times, I'd expect to see:
-e -e -e
Instead, I get:
-e -e
Linux appears to do the right thing here, so this seems like it
is a bug ... or am I missing something?
--
On Tue, 05 Jun 2012 10:58:39 -0500, Odhiambo Washington
odhia...@gmail.com wrote:
What does this linking look like?
Do you mean like symlinking zone files, so that domainA is exactly a
replica of domainB - as in conjoined?:)
precisely --
foo.com
foo.net - foo.com
foo.org - foo.com
In the last episode (Jun 05), Tim Daneliuk said:
Given this script:
#!/bin/sh
foo=
while read line
do
foo=$foo -e
done
echo $foo
Say I respond 3 times, I'd expect to see:
-e -e -e
Instead, I get:
-e -e
Linux appears to do the right thing here, so this seems like it
is
Try
machdep.independent_wallclock=1
On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 8:08 AM, Martin Dimitrov
martin.dimit...@mafiainc.org wrote:
Hi,
I am new to FreeBSD, decided to migrate a web server to FreeBSD. I
recently both a VPS that claim to use KVM as a virtualization service, I
don't know the details of
On 06/05/2012 11:35 AM, Dan Nelson wrote:
In the last episode (Jun 05), Tim Daneliuk said:
Given this script:
#!/bin/sh
foo=
while read line
do
foo=$foo -e
done
echo $foo
Say I respond 3 times, I'd expect to see:
-e -e -e
Instead, I get:
-e -e
Linux appears to do the right thing here,
On Tue, 05 Jun 2012 10:40:45 -0500
Tim Daneliuk tun...@tundraware.com wrote:
Given this script:
#!/bin/sh
foo=
while read line
do
foo=$foo -e
done
echo $foo
Say I respond 3 times, I'd expect to see:
-e -e -e
Instead, I get:
-e -e
The last line echo $foo is what is
From: Tim Daneliuk tun...@tundraware.com
Given this script:
#!/bin/sh
foo=
while read line
do
foo=$foo -e
done
echo $foo
Say I respond 3 times, I'd expect to see:
-e -e -e
Instead, I get:
-e -e
Linux appears to do the right thing here, so this seems like it
is a bug ...
UEFI considerations drive Fedora to pay MSFT to sign their kernel binaries
http://cwonline.computerworld.com/t/8035515/1292406/565573/0/
This would seem to make compiling from source difficult.
Kurt
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 1:19 PM, Kurt Buff kurt.b...@gmail.com wrote:
UEFI considerations drive Fedora to pay MSFT to sign their kernel binaries
http://cwonline.computerworld.com/t/8035515/1292406/565573/0/
This would seem to make compiling from source difficult.
Red Hat is the one that is
On Tue, 5 Jun 2012 11:19:26 -0700, Kurt Buff wrote:
UEFI considerations drive Fedora to pay MSFT to sign their kernel binaries
http://cwonline.computerworld.com/t/8035515/1292406/565573/0/
I may reply with another link:
http://mjg59.dreamwidth.org/12368.html
This would seem to make
Thanks, but it's not working:
# sysctl machdep.independent_wallclock=1
sysctl: unknown oid 'machdep.independent_wallclock'
I grep under /usr/src/sys for independent_wallclock and it appeared only
in ./i386/xen/clock.c, my architecture is amd64 if it matters.
On 06/05/2012 07:59 PM, Michael
On 05/06/2012 19:27, Antonio Olivares wrote:
I believe that should be unnecessary. It would only be a matter of
time before someone breaks the M$ layer of poop that is supposed to
prevent folks from booting other OSes other than Window$. They hit
the panic button too soon IMHO.
Press
UEFI considerations drive Fedora to pay MSFT to sign their kernel
binaries http://cwonline.computerworld.com/t/8035515/1292406/565573/0/
That's restriction is only for ARM devices which have a label that says
Desgined for Windows8. In other words those devices can not boot
another os except
Quoting Kurt Buff kurt.b...@gmail.com:
UEFI considerations drive Fedora to pay MSFT to sign their kernel binaries
http://cwonline.computerworld.com/t/8035515/1292406/565573/0/
This would seem to make compiling from source difficult.
I don't see how this MS scam is even at all legal.
It is
On 05/06/2012 20:12, Gökşin Akdeniz wrote:
That's restriction is only for ARM devices which have a label that says
Desgined for Windows8. In other words those devices can not boot
another os except Windows 8 due to secure boot option enabled by
default.
Not quite. As I understand it, on ARM
Not quite. As I understand it, on ARM secure boot will be enabled by
default and users won't have any option of disabling it or adding
their own keys.
That is correct. ARM based tablets which have Windows 8 preinstalled
will only boot Windows 8. There is no chance of disabling secure boot
On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 11:19:26AM -0700, Kurt Buff wrote:
UEFI considerations drive Fedora to pay MSFT to sign their kernel binaries
http://cwonline.computerworld.com/t/8035515/1292406/565573/0/
This would seem to make compiling from source difficult.
Kurt
2012-06-04 14:07, Antonio Olivares skrev:
I now have a similar problem. The icons in the program menu is not
displayed, only a white icon with a red cross.
Uninstalled the complete xfce4 and reinstalled it.
I also nuked the .config directory but icons are gone even so.
I have the 96 DPI
On Tue, 5 Jun 2012, Polytropon wrote:
On Tue, 5 Jun 2012 11:19:26 -0700, Kurt Buff wrote:
UEFI considerations drive Fedora to pay MSFT to sign their kernel binaries
http://cwonline.computerworld.com/t/8035515/1292406/565573/0/
I may reply with another link:
On Tue, 5 Jun 2012 13:19:00 -0700
Colin Barnabas articulated:
History show us that _everything_ will eventually run *nix.
Perhaps, but *nix will not run everything.
Take a look at the Sony PS3 debacle. After Sony yanked support for
installing other OS's, the community ripped apart their
On Tue, 5 Jun 2012 17:00:14 -0400 (EDT)
Daniel Feenberg articulated:
On Tue, 5 Jun 2012, Polytropon wrote:
On Tue, 5 Jun 2012 11:19:26 -0700, Kurt Buff wrote:
UEFI considerations drive Fedora to pay MSFT to sign their kernel
binaries
I have a fairly simple ipfw ruleset, which looks like:
100 allow tcp from any to any established
110 allow icmp from any to any icmptypes 0,3,8,11
120 deny icmp from any to any
130 allow ip from any to any via lo0
200 allow udp from me to any 53
210 allow udp from any 53 to me
220 allow udp
On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 08:04:35AM +0200, Roland Smith wrote:
Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2012 08:04:35 +0200
From: Roland Smith rsm...@xs4all.nl
Subject: Re: how do I fix this?
To: Gary Kline kl...@thought.org
Cc: FreeBSD freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
On Mon, Jun 04, 2012 at 09:53:11PM -0700, Gary
Hello friends ( old )
I've moved over ( tried other, but not so further paths )
No, not all , but my butter and bread : my gateway
Also servers as my mail and DNS among others
From FreeBSD to OpenBSD
Fckg gays, you want so much, but do we want it ?
All this going from bsd to clang and
On Tue, 5 Jun 2012, Jerry wrote:
On Tue, 5 Jun 2012 17:00:14 -0400 (EDT)
Daniel Feenberg articulated:
On Tue, 5 Jun 2012, Polytropon wrote:
On Tue, 5 Jun 2012 11:19:26 -0700, Kurt Buff wrote:
UEFI considerations drive Fedora to pay MSFT to sign their kernel
binaries
A single find already had the needed selection and execution ops.
So I was trying it first, before writing an external parser, etc.
It's still not clear to me how find is compiling the arguments
internally, but using -vv on the utils helped a lot. After adding
-false after all the -exec's, it now
Firstly, sorry if this is a bit of a newbie question. I am quite new to
FreeBSD (though fairly experienced at Linux). Almost everything in FreeBSD
is fine, except that no matter what I try I cannot get the (USB) mouse to
work.
I have scoured the handbook, and Googled, but to no avail.
This is
2012-06-06 01:14, Walter Hurry skrev:
Firstly, sorry if this is a bit of a newbie question. I am quite new to
FreeBSD (though fairly experienced at Linux). Almost everything in FreeBSD
is fine, except that no matter what I try I cannot get the (USB) mouse to
work.
I have scoured the handbook,
On Tue, 05 Jun 2012 23:14:35 +, Walter Hurry wrote:
Firstly, sorry if this is a bit of a newbie question. I am quite new to
FreeBSD (though fairly experienced at Linux). Almost everything in
FreeBSD is fine, except that no matter what I try I cannot get the (USB)
mouse to work.
Can
On Tue, 5 Jun 2012, Walter Hurry wrote:
Firstly, sorry if this is a bit of a newbie question. I am quite new to
FreeBSD (though fairly experienced at Linux). Almost everything in FreeBSD
is fine, except that no matter what I try I cannot get the (USB) mouse to
work.
I have scoured the
On Tue, 5 Jun 2012, G?k?in Akdeniz wrote:
For the time being only ARM platform is restricted.
True, but I would be astonished if this restriction were not expanded by
MS in the future. Just my opinion, but I believe their ultimate goal is
to add platforms until the secure boot restriction
On Tue, 5 Jun 2012 19:57:30 -0400 (EDT)
Chris Hill ch...@monochrome.org wrote:
On Tue, 5 Jun 2012, G?k?in Akdeniz wrote:
For the time being only ARM platform is restricted.
True, but I would be astonished if this restriction were not expanded by
MS in the future. Just my opinion, but I
On Jun 5, 2012 6:35 PM, Mike Jeays mike.je...@rogers.com wrote:
On Tue, 5 Jun 2012 19:57:30 -0400 (EDT)
Chris Hill ch...@monochrome.org wrote:
On Tue, 5 Jun 2012, G?k?in Akdeniz wrote:
For the time being only ARM platform is restricted.
True, but I would be astonished if this
On Wed, 06 Jun 2012 01:22:51 +0200, Bernt Hansson wrote:
Option AutoAddDevices On
Set this to off.
Thanks for the reply. Yes, I've tried setting it to Off, but there is
no apparent difference; only a new set of messages in Xorg.0.log:
(EE) config/hal: couldn't initialise context:
Walter Hurry walterhu...@gmail.com writes:
Firstly, sorry if this is a bit of a newbie question. I am quite new to
FreeBSD (though fairly experienced at Linux). Almost everything in FreeBSD
is fine, except that no matter what I try I cannot get the (USB) mouse to
work.
I have scoured
Hi
I have had success on my hardware with this setting:
# The working configuration. The mouse daemon in /etc/rc.conf
# was dsabled.
#
# Section ServerLayout
# Identifier X.org Configured
# Screen 0
On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 7:05 PM, Scott Ballantyne s...@ssr.com wrote:
Walter Hurry walterhu...@gmail.com writes:
Firstly, sorry if this is a bit of a newbie question. I am quite new to
FreeBSD (though fairly experienced at Linux). Almost everything in
FreeBSD
is fine, except that no
Hi,
On 05 June 2012 19:59:48 Waitman Gobble wrote:
On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 7:05 PM, Scott Ballantyne s...@ssr.com wrote:
i'll give that a try. After updating a couple of days ago the mouse is
glued to the center of the screen after starting X. I noticed if i first
kill moused before startx
46 matches
Mail list logo
