A few things you could try adding to make.conf:
FORCE_MAKE_JOBS=yes
MAKE_JOBS_NUMBER=4
I'm not sure this is supported on a _single_ core Pentium 4 CPU
(or will gain speed if it was emulated).
MAKE_JOBS_NUMBER=2 make sense - one process I/O may overlap with other
compute
Hi
I run systems using FreeBSD 9.0
FreeBSD utah.XXXcom 9.0-STABLE FreeBSD 9.0-STABLE #1: Wed Mar 21 15:22:14
MDT 2012 chad@underhill:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/UNDERHILL-XEN amd64
and on those systems run a bunch of jails. I have Apache 2.2 built and running
in the jail in question, and
Are there any current options available to support on-access antivirus
scanning on FreeBSD?
security/dazuko doesn't build on FreeBSD more recent than 8[0], so that's a
non-starter, and it looks as if the FreeBSD zfs implementation lacks support
for the vscan property[1], so using vscan with
Are there any current options available to support on-access antivirus
scanning on FreeBSD?
FreeBSD doesn't need this as there are no viruses on that system.
And yes, I know that neither FreeBSD nor Solaris are renowned for their
sickly vulnerability to viruses, but we operate in a mixed
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 12:51:04PM +0200, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
Are there any current options available to support on-access antivirus
scanning on FreeBSD?
FreeBSD doesn't need this as there are no viruses on that system.
Well, thanks.
And yes, I know that neither FreeBSD nor Solaris
On Fri, 27 Jul 2012 12:00:19 +0100, Daniel Bye wrote:
All desktops/workstations (that is, all of them, every single one),
must have AV software running on them. There will be no exceptions, on pain
of dismissal.
Why is the AV software running on FreeBSD not sufficient in
the opinion of your
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 07:19:45AM -0400, Daniel Feenberg wrote:
On Fri, 27 Jul 2012, Daniel Bye wrote:
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 12:51:04PM +0200, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
Are there any current options available to support on-access antivirus
scanning on FreeBSD?
FreeBSD doesn't need
On Fri, 27 Jul 2012, Daniel Bye wrote:
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 12:51:04PM +0200, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
Are there any current options available to support on-access antivirus
scanning on FreeBSD?
FreeBSD doesn't need this as there are no viruses on that system.
Well, thanks.
And yes,
On 7/27/12 1:47 PM, Daniel Bye wrote:
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 07:19:45AM -0400, Daniel Feenberg wrote:
On Fri, 27 Jul 2012, Daniel Bye wrote:
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 12:51:04PM +0200, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
Are there any current options available to support on-access antivirus
scanning
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 01:23:36PM +0200, Polytropon wrote:
On Fri, 27 Jul 2012 12:00:19 +0100, Daniel Bye wrote:
All desktops/workstations (that is, all of them, every single one),
must have AV software running on them. There will be no exceptions, on pain
of dismissal.
Why is the AV
Hi,
On Fri, 27 Jul 2012 12:47:29 +0100
Daniel Bye freebsd-questi...@slightlystrange.org wrote:
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 07:19:45AM -0400, Daniel Feenberg wrote:
On Fri, 27 Jul 2012, Daniel Bye wrote:
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 12:51:04PM +0200, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
Are there any
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 01:52:16PM +0200, Damien Fleuriot wrote:
FUSE ClamFS
Ah, thanks for that. I'll check it out.
But then, FUSE... ew...
I know. But, if it gets me my workstation... ;-)
Dan
--
Daniel Bye
_
Hello,
Do we have something (in the ports) to calculate easy the difference of
two times given as hh:mm - hh:mm? Some hack in bc(1) or something like
this? Well, I could translate the times into UNIX seconds of epoche,
build the diff and reconvert, but something more easy (and not in Perl
or C,
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 07:15:29PM +0700, Erich Dollansky wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, 27 Jul 2012 12:47:29 +0100
Daniel Bye freebsd-questi...@slightlystrange.org wrote:
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 07:19:45AM -0400, Daniel Feenberg wrote:
On Fri, 27 Jul 2012, Daniel Bye wrote:
On Fri,
Matthias Apitz writes:
Do we have something (in the ports) to calculate easy the
difference of two times given as hh:mm - hh:mm? Some hack in
bc(1) or something like this? Well, I could translate the times
into UNIX seconds of epoche, build the diff and reconvert, but
something more
Hi,
On Fri, 27 Jul 2012 13:38:11 +0100
Daniel Bye freebsd-questi...@slightlystrange.org wrote:
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 07:15:29PM +0700, Erich Dollansky wrote:
On Fri, 27 Jul 2012 12:47:29 +0100
Daniel Bye freebsd-questi...@slightlystrange.org wrote:
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 07:19:45AM
On 27/07/2012 13:34, Matthias Apitz wrote:
Do we have something (in the ports) to calculate easy the difference of
two times given as hh:mm - hh:mm? Some hack in bc(1) or something like
this? Well, I could translate the times into UNIX seconds of epoche,
build the diff and reconvert, but
On 27/07/2012 13:15, Erich Dollansky wrote:
You will not find them. The scanners running on FreeBSD are looking for
Windows pests.
Does it scan for FreeBSD viruses? I would wonder.
AV Scanners are looking for the signature of any known malware. The
important word there is 'known' -- it's
reinstalling the sources fixed the problem. Thanks.
/Venkat
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 5:49 PM, Damien Fleuriot m...@my.gd wrote:
On 7/26/12 2:08 PM, Venkat Duvvuru wrote:
Hi,
Please find my repsonses in line.
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 4:57 PM, Damien Fleuriot m...@my.gd
On 07/26/2012 18:17, Jeff Tipton wrote:
Hi,
My mc-light doesn't work with tcsh. When I try to launch it:
mc
Segmentation fault (core dumped)
uname -a
FreeBSD jeff-netf 9.0-RELEASE-p3 FreeBSD 9.0-RELEASE-p3 #0: Tue Jun 12
01:47:53 UTC 2012
On 07/27/12 13:14, Daniel Bye wrote:
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 01:52:16PM +0200, Damien Fleuriot wrote:
FUSE ClamFS
Ah, thanks for that. I'll check it out.
But then, FUSE... ew...
I know. But, if it gets me my workstation... ;-)
The wiki suggests that FUSE might be part of release 10:
On Thu, 26 Jul 2012 17:47:10 +0200
Ivan Voras wrote:
On 26/07/2012 04:14, RW wrote:
I asked a similar questions to the OPs in the geom list and didn't
get an answer. Geli doesn't need or isn't using any advantages of
XTS. And CBC in geli is actually equivalent to ESSIV (see the
Hello, my system doesn't work with tcsh too (
$ uname -a
FreeBSD xxx.xx 9.0-RELEASE-p3 FreeBSD 9.0-RELEASE-p3 #0: Thu Jul 5
16:54:22 MSK 2012 root@x:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/PORT amd64
$ env | grep SHELL
SHELL=/bin/tcsh
$ mc
Segmentation fault
$ mc -V
The Midnight Commander 4.1.40-pre9
--On July 27, 2012 11:43:08 AM +0100 Daniel Bye
freebsd-questi...@slightlystrange.org wrote:
Are there any current options available to support on-access antivirus
scanning on FreeBSD?
Clamav.
I did some testing several years ago with ClamAV, Sophos and McAfee
(scanning incoming mail),
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 10:02:26AM -0500, Paul Schmehl wrote:
--On July 27, 2012 11:43:08 AM +0100 Daniel Bye
freebsd-questi...@slightlystrange.org wrote:
Are there any current options available to support on-access antivirus
scanning on FreeBSD?
Clamav.
I use it on my home mail server
On Friday, 27 July 2012 09:22:52 Wojciech Puchar wrote:
A few things you could try adding to make.conf:
FORCE_MAKE_JOBS=yes
MAKE_JOBS_NUMBER=4
I'm not sure this is supported on a _single_ core Pentium 4 CPU
(or will gain speed if it was emulated).
MAKE_JOBS_NUMBER=2 make sense -
RW rwmailli...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Thu, 26 Jul 2012 17:47:10 +0200
Ivan Voras wrote:
On 26/07/2012 04:14, RW wrote:
I asked a similar questions to the OPs in the geom list and didn't
get an answer. Geli doesn't need or isn't using any advantages of
XTS. And CBC in geli is
Virus scanning should not be your problem. If the Windows users in the
organization have an antivirus solution there is no need for you to have
one. It doesn't matter if you share files over SAMBA -- when they access
the files their virus scanner will check them.
On Fri, 27 Jul 2012 13:10:12 -0500, Mark Felder wrote:
Virus scanning should not be your problem. If the Windows users in the
organization have an antivirus solution there is no need for you to have
one. It doesn't matter if you share files over SAMBA -- when they access
the files their
I did some testing several years ago with ClamAV, Sophos and McAfee (scanning
incoming mail), and ClamAV was comparable to McAfee in detection rates - over
98%.
i use clamav for mail virus checking and IMHO it is the only place where
realtime virus checking make sense.
some windows users
Saying that geli's CBC implementation is good enough for someone
seems to imply that it's somehow worse than XTS in general. Could you
true. i still don't really understand the difference.
I don't need actually anything other that inability to read data from my
disk for a potential thief.
31 matches
Mail list logo
