On Thursday 10 June 2010 18:30:52 Matthew Seaman wrote:
On 10/06/2010 17:12:50, Jerry wrote:
On Thu, 10 Jun 2010 15:12:48 +0200
Jonathan McKeown j.mcke...@ru.ac.za articulated:
Isn't that called VERP (variable envelope return path)? I agree - the
load it would impose isn't worth it.
On Fri, 11 Jun 2010 09:04:21 +0200,
Jonathan McKeown j.mcke...@ru.ac.za said:
J I looked up VERP last night to check that I was right about the extra
J load, and came across a reference to VERP being the idea of DJB, and
J being acceptable to qmail users because there's no penalty load - qmail
So, it would appear that Midphase hosting are still incapable of working out
why their ticketing system is sending replies with forged From: address to
posters to the freebsd-questions mailing list. (Their support queue is at
mpcustomer.com).
I'm assuming the list admins already have examples
Hi,
Am 10.06.10 11:47, schrieb Jonathan McKeown:
Subject: [#24548754] Re: why does ps |grep sometimes not return itself?
Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2010 02:46:31 -0500
From: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Reply-To: supp...@mpcustomer.com
Message-ID:e436b556aafa1c4bd0f2c367a0097...@secure.mpcustomer.com
Am 10.06.10 11:47, schrieb Jonathan McKeown:
I'm assuming the list admins already have examples to work with, but here is a
set of headers from the reply I got to my last list post, in case it's any
help.
for everyone how does not want this mails anymore but into your
/etc/mail/access the
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 4:24 AM, Matthias Fechner ide...@fechner.net wrote:
Hi,
Am 10.06.10 11:47, schrieb Jonathan McKeown:
Subject: [#24548754] Re: why does ps |grep sometimes not return itself?
Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2010 02:46:31 -0500
From: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Reply-To:
On Thursday 10 June 2010 14:06:46 Rob Farmer wrote:
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 4:24 AM, Matthias Fechner ide...@fechner.net
wrote:
Hi,
Am 10.06.10 11:47, schrieb Jonathan McKeown:
Subject: [#24548754] Re: why does ps |grep sometimes not return itself?
Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2010 02:46:31 -0500
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 5:32 AM, Jonathan McKeown j.mcke...@ru.ac.za wrote:
On Thursday 10 June 2010 14:06:46 Rob Farmer wrote:
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 4:24 AM, Matthias Fechner ide...@fechner.net
wrote:
Hi,
Am 10.06.10 11:47, schrieb Jonathan McKeown:
Subject: [#24548754] Re: why does
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/06/2010 13:32:23, Jonathan McKeown wrote:
I know it creates work for the admins, but couldn't their address be
unsubscribed and banned, given that they have been creating a nuisance for at
least the last several weeks now?
Sure. Just tell
On Thursday 10 June 2010 14:51:42 Rob Farmer wrote:
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 5:32 AM, Jonathan McKeown j.mcke...@ru.ac.za
wrote:
[rant about midphase hosting and mpcustomer.com]
They posted in a previous thread about this, saying they couldn't
unsubscribe under their address, ie. somebody
In response to Rob Farmer rfar...@predatorlabs.net:
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 5:32 AM, Jonathan McKeown j.mcke...@ru.ac.za wrote:
On Thursday 10 June 2010 14:06:46 Rob Farmer wrote:
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 4:24 AM, Matthias Fechner ide...@fechner.net
wrote:
Hi,
Am 10.06.10 11:47,
On Thursday 10 June 2010 15:04:53 Matthew Seaman wrote:
The only other mechanism might be to tag each list e-mail with a unique
value for each recipient in such a way that it is preserved in the
message that mpcustomer.com's help system sends out. That has severe
problems of scale and load
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 6:09 AM, Jonathan McKeown j.mcke...@ru.ac.za wrote:
On Thursday 10 June 2010 14:51:42 Rob Farmer wrote:
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 5:32 AM, Jonathan McKeown j.mcke...@ru.ac.za
wrote:
[rant about midphase hosting and mpcustomer.com]
They posted in a previous thread about
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/06/2010 14:12:48, Jonathan McKeown wrote:
Isn't that called VERP (variable envelope return path)? I agree - the load it
Dat's der bunny.
would impose isn't worth it. I'm just shocked that midphase care so little
about their reputation or
Am 10.06.10 15:30, schrieb Matthew Seaman:
Until then, as someone upthread said, block them using your access DB if
you run your own sendmail based mail system. The equivalents for people
running other MTAs are left as exercises for interested students. If
you don't have your own mail system,
From owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org Thu Jun 10 06:25:02 2010
Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2010 13:24:55 +0200
From: Matthias Fechner ide...@fechner.net
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Midphase Hosting
Hi,
Am 10.06.10 11:47, schrieb Jonathan McKeown:
Subject: [#24548754] Re
On Thu, 10 Jun 2010 15:12:48 +0200
Jonathan McKeown j.mcke...@ru.ac.za articulated:
On Thursday 10 June 2010 15:04:53 Matthew Seaman wrote:
The only other mechanism might be to tag each list e-mail with a
unique value for each recipient in such a way that it is preserved
in the message
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/06/2010 15:13:39, Matthias Fechner wrote:
Am 10.06.10 15:30, schrieb Matthew Seaman:
Until then, as someone upthread said, block them using your access DB if
you run your own sendmail based mail system. The equivalents for people
running
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/06/2010 17:12:50, Jerry wrote:
On Thu, 10 Jun 2010 15:12:48 +0200
Jonathan McKeown j.mcke...@ru.ac.za articulated:
On Thursday 10 June 2010 15:04:53 Matthew Seaman wrote:
The only other mechanism might be to tag each list e-mail with a
On 10.06.2010 18:12, Jerry wrote:
On Thu, 10 Jun 2010 15:12:48 +0200
Jonathan McKeown j.mcke...@ru.ac.za articulated:
On Thursday 10 June 2010 15:04:53 Matthew Seaman wrote:
The only other mechanism might be to tag each list e-mail with a
unique value for each recipient in such a way that
20 matches
Mail list logo
