The problem is the November compromise, search for that in the mailing
list. There are still no packages available for 9.1-RELEASE.
Cheers
2013/2/15 Eduardo Morras emorr...@yahoo.es
Hi all, yesterday i updated my server to 9.1-RELEASE from 8.3. After that,
while recompiling the ports and
And there was an unofficial pkg repository, I can't find where, it was
mentioned recently.
On Fri, 2013-02-15 at 11:03 +0100, Eduardo Morras wrote:
Hi all, yesterday i updated my server to 9.1-RELEASE from 8.3. After that,
while recompiling the ports and packages i get a lot off errors trying
On 02/20/2013 12:20 PM, paranormal wrote:
And there was an unofficial pkg repository, I can't find where, it was
mentioned recently.
There was a message on the stable list
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/2013-February/072037.html
On Fri, 2013-02-15 at 11:03 +0100, Eduardo
elhosots wrote:
Because of a missing link at freebsd.org, pkg_add -r pkgname
does not work
I hand modify the source code and put 9-stable above 9.1-RELEASE to
get around the problem in main.c
Works fine for me.
You did not scan the questions archives. This problem has been covered
many
This path does not exist on ftp.freebsd.org.
Quite so. It's because of this:
http://www.freebsd.org/news/2012-compromise.html
As a consequence, large parts of the package building infrastructure are
quarantined, pending reinstallation. Also there is a lot of work going
into revising
On 02/01/2013 08:00, Zyumbilev, Peter wrote:
In this case for a new Nas4free machine, will you recommend to base it
on 9.0 or 9.1 ?
Either. Whichever one works best for you, and if you can't distinguish
them on performance or bug-fixes, choose 9.1.
However, don't fall into the trap of
Matthew Seaman wrote:
On 02/01/2013 08:00, Zyumbilev, Peter wrote:
In this case for a new Nas4free machine, will you recommend to base it
on 9.0 or 9.1 ?
Either. Whichever one works best for you, and if you can't distinguish
them on performance or bug-fixes, choose 9.1.
However, don't fall
In freebsd-questions Digest, Vol 448, Issue 3, Message: 24
- please pardon the loss of threading -
On Wed, 2 Jan 2013 02:47:41 -0500 (EST) d...@safeport.com wrote:
On Wed, 2 Jan 2013, Matthew Seaman wrote:
On 02/01/2013 05:20, doug wrote:
Is this command being phased out? pkg_add -r
On 02/01/2013 14:42, Fbsd8 wrote:
what is the status of
ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/amd64/packages-current/Latest/
which is on the ftp servers?
The latest packages there are what was compiled before the security
incident. It hasn't been updated since.
Cheers,
On 02/01/2013 05:20, doug wrote:
Is this command being phased out? pkg_add -r uses a default environment
of
ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/amd64/packages-9.1-release/Latest/
In fact, yes, pkg_add and the other pkg_tools commands are being phased
out in favour of pkgng. However it is
On Wed, 2 Jan 2013, Matthew Seaman wrote:
On 02/01/2013 05:20, doug wrote:
Is this command being phased out? pkg_add -r uses a default environment
of
ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/amd64/packages-9.1-release/Latest/
In fact, yes, pkg_add and the other pkg_tools commands are being
On Mon, 12 Nov 2012 23:54:14 -0500 (EST), doug wrote:
Doing pkg_add in the normal way:
pkg_add -r diffuse
Error: Unable to get
ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/amd64/packages-9.1-release/Latest/diffuse.tbz:
File unavailable (e.g., file not found, no access)
To make it work:
On 21/10/2012 12:45, Alexandr Alexeev wrote:
Hello.
I have a problem with MongoDB installation:
asus# pkg_add -r mongodb
Fetching
http://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-9-stable/Latest/mongodb.tbz...
Done.
=== Creating users and/or groups.
Using existing group
Thanks!
BTW, MongoDB port has the same error:
=== Installing for mongodb-2.0.6_1
=== Generating temporary packing list
=== Checking if databases/mongodb already installed
=== Creating users and/or groups.
Using existing group `mongodb'.
Creating user `mongodb' with uid `922'.
pw: user
On 21/10/2012 13:46, Alexandr Alexeev wrote:
Thanks!
BTW, MongoDB port has the same error:
=== Installing for mongodb-2.0.6_1
=== Generating temporary packing list
=== Checking if databases/mongodb already installed
=== Creating users and/or groups.
Using existing group `mongodb'.
On Jan 11, 2012, at 2:03 PM, Randal L. Schwartz wrote:
First, it looks like pkg_add -r needs the full package name. Is there
any way to give it zsh instead of zsh-4.3.15?
Create a symlink from zsh-4.3.15.tbz to zsh.tbz on the package server.
You can also control this at the time of building
Jason == Jason Helfman jhelf...@e-e.com writes:
Jason Why not just point the PACKAGESITE to the Latest directory of the tree
you
Jason want to install?
I am, but it has zsh-4.3.15.tbz and not zsh.tbz, so I have to pkg_add -r
zsh-4.3.15, and that's the annoying part.
--
Randal L. Schwartz -
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 02:23:48PM -0800, Chuck Swiger thus spake:
On Jan 11, 2012, at 2:03 PM, Randal L. Schwartz wrote:
First, it looks like pkg_add -r needs the full package name. Is there
any way to give it zsh instead of zsh-4.3.15?
Create a symlink from zsh-4.3.15.tbz to zsh.tbz on the
On 11/01/2012 22:32, Randal L. Schwartz wrote:
Jason == Jason Helfman jhelf...@e-e.com writes:
Jason Why not just point the PACKAGESITE to the Latest directory of the tree
you
Jason want to install?
I am, but it has zsh-4.3.15.tbz and not zsh.tbz, so I have to pkg_add -r
zsh-4.3.15, and
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 5:03 PM, Randal L. Schwartz
mer...@stonehenge.com wrote:
I've figured out how to point PACKAGESITE at a URL of my choosing.
First, it looks like pkg_add -r needs the full package name. Is there
any way to give it zsh instead of zsh-4.3.15?
I've read somewhere that
On Sun, Dec 11, 2011 at 10:09 PM, Mage m...@mage.hu wrote:
Hello,
why is that
pkg_add -r x11/kde4 could not install kde4 (404 not found) but portmaster
-P x11/kde4 did, however
portmaster -P xorg didn't install xorg (it just reinstalled some modules)
then pkg_add -r xorg installed
On 04/19/2011 11:35 AM, H.Erkin ATAK wrote:
I am running freebsd 8.2 on virtualbox on an ubuntu machine.
I am running gnome and have network access no problem.
But I can not add any packages via pkg_add.
It gives can not fetch ftp address.
I tried different mirrors but it did not work.
On 19 April 2011 09:35, H.Erkin ATAK erkin.a...@gmail.com wrote:
I am running freebsd 8.2 on virtualbox on an ubuntu machine.
I am running gnome and have network access no problem.
But I can not add any packages via pkg_add.
It gives can not fetch ftp address.
I tried different mirrors
El día Tuesday, April 19, 2011 a las 11:35:47AM +0300, H.Erkin ATAK escribió:
I am running freebsd 8.2 on virtualbox on an ubuntu machine.
I am running gnome and have network access no problem.
what does this mean 'have network access' exactly?
But I can not add any packages via pkg_add.
Your firewall may be the problem.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Thanks Guys.
(Jason H, Chuck S and Polytropon.)
OK. I managed to get Hiawatha compiled, installed, configured and
running! It even works, though I've not yet finished reading up on all
it's features etc, so it'll be a while before I let it loose on the
public, but so far, it appears to work
On Nov 30, 2010, at 12:39 PM, Dave wrote:
Or compile Hiawatha from sources? (I *Will* need guidance and hand-holding
to do that!)
Well. Start with:
cd /usr/ports/www/hiawatha
make install
Regards,
--
-Chuck
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 08:39:24PM -, Dave thus spake:
OK, another show stopper for me, but probably a simple fix for the
wise on list.
FreeBSD V8.0 that I'm slowley getting to know (and beginning to like!)
FreeBSD FBSD.67MK181QZ 8.0-RELEASE FreeBSD 8.0-RELEASE #0: Wed Apr 14
22:55:09 BST
On Tue, 30 Nov 2010 20:39:24 -, Dave d...@g8kbv.demon.co.uk wrote:
So, can I (and how) get this version to use I guess the
8.1 repository, or how do I cleanly update this to 8.1, though to
maintain my needed PPS support I guess I'll need to recompile the kernel
again? Is the change from
On 8/7/2010 6:03 PM, Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
However, I'm on dialup. pkg_add doesn't seem to be able to resume since
I can't use the phone line (or the computer) long enough to install
packages all in one go.
Is there a solution to this?
There might be a more elegant solution but this
From: Kevin Kinsey k...@daleco.biz
Q2: Where on my hard drive are the bytes that tell
pkg_add to use
ftp.freebsd.org when downloading packages?
You mean like inode number, which cylinder
No, I am looking for a file name.
Thank you,
Chris
On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 11:07:24PM -0700, Chris Stankevitz wrote:
From: Kevin Kinsey k...@daleco.biz
Q2: Where on my hard drive are the bytes that tell
pkg_add to use
ftp.freebsd.org when downloading packages?
You mean like inode number, which cylinder
No, I am looking for a
--- On Wed, 6/30/10, Yuri Pankov yuri.pan...@gmail.com wrote:
/usr/src/usr.sbin/pkg_install/add/main.c
static char * getpackagesite(void)
which constructs URL using ftp.freebsd.org unless
PACKAGESITE and
PACKAGEROOT are defined.
Perfect, thank you!
Chris
Hi,
On 6/30/10 8:00 PM, Mr. Darren wrote:
Though this will not be the focus of my question. Lots of ports are being
created for FreeBSD and none submitted. I don't know why.
My problem arises when trying to install one of these which is put together
quite well. pkg_add -r
On Wed, 30 Jun 2010 17:00:34 -0700 (PDT)
Mr. Darren darren...@yahoo.com wrote:
Though this will not be the focus of my question. Lots of ports are
being created for FreeBSD and none submitted. I don't know why.
My problem arises when trying to install one of these which is put
together
Mr. Darren wrote:
Though this will not be the focus of my question.
Lots of ports are being created for FreeBSD and none submitted. I
don't know why.
My problem arises when trying to install one of these which is put together quite well.
pkg_add -r http://site/something.tbz, or pkg_add
Chris Stankevitz wrote:
pkg_add -r gnome2
This command fails repeatedly with broken pipe because the FTP
connection breaks. When it dies, I just re-run the command. I'm now on the
fifth attempt.
The gnome2 package is a meta package that installs many other packages.
Q1: Is it bad for
uname -a
FreeBSD mybsd.zsoft.com 8.0-RELEASE-p2 FreeBSD 8.0-RELEASE-p2 #9: Sat Mar 27
15:06:39 CST 2010 r...@mybsd.zsoft.com:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/MYKERNEL
i386
echo $PKG_PATH
PKG_PATH: Undefined variable.
cat .cshrc |grep -i package
setenv PACKAGESITE
On 6/24/10 9:01 PM, zaxis wrote:
uname -a
FreeBSD mybsd.zsoft.com 8.0-RELEASE-p2 FreeBSD 8.0-RELEASE-p2 #9: Sat Mar 27
15:06:39 CST 2010 r...@mybsd.zsoft.com:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/MYKERNEL
i386
echo $PKG_PATH
PKG_PATH: Undefined variable.
cat .cshrc |grep -i package
setenv
Glen Barber wrote:
On 6/24/10 9:01 PM, zaxis wrote:
uname -a
FreeBSD mybsd.zsoft.com 8.0-RELEASE-p2 FreeBSD 8.0-RELEASE-p2 #9: Sat
Mar 27
15:06:39 CST 2010 r...@mybsd.zsoft.com:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/MYKERNEL
i386
echo $PKG_PATH
PKG_PATH: Undefined variable.
cat .cshrc |grep -i
On 6/24/10 9:49 PM, Fbsd1 wrote:
Glen Barber wrote:
Using the above FTP URL, PKG_PATH will look for
ftp://ftp.cn.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-8.0-release/Latest/
Regards,
No I am not looking for the remote path to fetch the package
distribution file from. When doing pkg_add
On 6/24/10 10:02 PM, Glen Barber wrote:
On 6/24/10 9:49 PM, Fbsd1 wrote:
Glen Barber wrote:
Using the above FTP URL, PKG_PATH will look for
ftp://ftp.cn.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-8.0-release/Latest/
Regards,
No I am not looking for the remote path to fetch the package
On Thursday 26 March 2009 21:46:07 L Campbell wrote:
Okay, so apparently there's some serious weirdness in the logic in
src/usr.sbin/pkg_install/lib/url.c, in fileGetURL. This function takes
two parameters, base and spec, and has the following behavior --
snip behavior and patch
Yes, it is a
On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 7:37 AM, Mel Flynn
mel.flynn+fbsd.questi...@mailing.thruhere.net wrote:
On Thursday 26 March 2009 21:46:07 L Campbell wrote:
Okay, so apparently there's some serious weirdness in the logic in
src/usr.sbin/pkg_install/lib/url.c, in fileGetURL. This function takes
two
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 3:37 PM, L Campbell ll...@virginia.edu wrote:
blah
Oh, and please CC me on any replies since I don't follow this list.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To
Okay, so apparently there's some serious weirdness in the logic in
src/usr.sbin/pkg_install/lib/url.c, in fileGetURL. This function takes
two parameters, base and spec, and has the following behavior --
* if spec is a valid URL, it's used unchanged as the path to the remote package.
* if base is
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
extract: execute '/usr/local/bin/xmlcatmgr -sc
/usr/local/share/sgml/catalog.ports add linuxdoc/catalog'
xmlcatmgr: unbalanced arguments for `add' action
pkg_add: command '/usr/local/bin/xmlcatmgr -sc
/usr/local/share/sgml/catalog.ports add linuxdoc/catalog'
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I believe this is the same as the error message I saw originally
(when I had not specified -v, so it wasn't buried among a pile of
other stuff):
xmlcatmgr: unbalanced arguments for `add' action
# pkg_add -Kv linuxdoc*
Requested space: 36624 bytes, free space: 774946816
...
extract: execute '/usr/local/bin/xmlcatmgr -sc
/usr/local/share/sgml/catalog.ports add linuxdoc/catalog'
xmlcatmgr: unbalanced arguments for `add' action
pkg_add: command '/usr/local/bin/xmlcatmgr -sc
/usr/local/share/sgml/catalog.ports add linuxdoc/catalog' failed
...
That looks
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The first time I tried to add linuxdoc-1.1_1.tbz to a new-from-CD
7.0 installation, it complained about a missing dependency that
was on the other CD. OK, I switched CDs and installed that, then
switched back and retried linuxdoc-1.1_1.tbz, and it gave me some
sort of
[trying to install linuxdoc-1.1_1.tbz] it gave me some
sort of error about an unbalanced add operation. (I didn't try
to copy down all the details, figuring instead to retry with a
script(1) active so as to capture them.) Upon that retry, it now
tells me that the package is already
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[trying to install linuxdoc-1.1_1.tbz] it gave me some
sort of error about an unbalanced add operation. (I didn't try
to copy down all the details, figuring instead to retry with a
script(1) active so as to capture them.) Upon that retry, it now
tells me that the
What you showed does not indicate a failure. If you are saying
that the package wasn't actually installed completely, then
pkg_delete it and retry.
I am not saying that the package was installed incompletely,
incorrectly, or something else because I don't know which of those
applies. *The
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What you showed does not indicate a failure. If you are saying
that the package wasn't actually installed completely, then
pkg_delete it and retry.
I am not saying that the package was installed incompletely,
incorrectly, or something else because I don't know which
I believe this is the same as the error message I saw originally
(when I had not specified -v, so it wasn't buried among a pile of
other stuff):
xmlcatmgr: unbalanced arguments for `add' action
# pkg_add -Kv linuxdoc*
Requested space: 36624 bytes, free space: 774946816 bytes in
Colin Brace wrote:
Hi all,
At some point after my original installation of v.7-BETA3 in late
November and a subsquent upgrade to BETA4 with Colin Percival's
freebsd-update, installing packages remotely with pkg_add on my system
broke. For example:
550 Cannot connect to 78.27.2.208:53572 -
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Over the weekend in trying to build xorg and kde from packages, none of
the various options for the package tree seemed to work. Plus the meta
port for kde was not available.
If one goes to /pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-6-stable/kde (1)
On Tuesday 04 September 2007 18:32:15 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Over the weekend in trying to build xorg and kde from packages, none of the
various options for the package tree seemed to work. Plus the meta port for
kde was not available.
If one goes to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 4 Sep 2007, Bahman M. wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Over the weekend in trying to build xorg and kde from packages, none
of the various options for the package tree seemed to work. Plus the
meta port for kde was not available.
If one goes to
On Tue, Aug 07, 2007 at 10:15:11AM -0700, Steve Franks wrote:
occasionally I feel like a total idiot asking a really dumb question,
but I'm pretty much out of ideas and I've wasted hours messing with
PKGROOT, changing the 'options' in sysinstall, and I can't seem to get
things I can see right
On Tuesday 07 August 2007 12:39:36 Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Tue, Aug 07, 2007 at 10:15:11AM -0700, Steve Franks wrote:
occasionally I feel like a total idiot asking a really dumb question,
but I'm pretty much out of ideas and I've wasted hours messing with
PKGROOT, changing the 'options' in
I think I was missing the '/latest'. Thanks for the example.
Sometimes that's key.
Steve
On 8/7/07, Jonathan Horne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tuesday 07 August 2007 12:39:36 Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Tue, Aug 07, 2007 at 10:15:11AM -0700, Steve Franks wrote:
occasionally I feel like a
there is no such package bash. there's only bash-someversionofbashport
for example bash-3.1.16
get a look at
tp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-6.1-release/Latest/
to see what version of bash is available
On
Tue, 27 Feb 2007, Don Munyak wrote:
I am having trouble using
On Wed, Feb 28, 2007 at 12:02:30PM +0100, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
there is no such package bash. there's only bash-someversionofbashport
Au contraire:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ $ pkg_add -r bash
Fetching
ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-6.2-release/Latest/bash.tbz...
Done.
Thanks everyone. The issue seems to be related to IPF, which I am
trying to sort out. Basically when ipf is enabled, the connectivity
fails, although my pass out rule for ftp includes ports 20 21. With
ipf -D disabled, no problems. I'll probably post to a new thread after
I've tried some more
Don Munyak wrote:
I am having trouble using pkg_add -r some package. I keep getting
the following error.
---
p0069# pkg_add -r bash
Error: FTP Unable to get
ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-6.1-release/Latest/bash.tbz:
The file does or
On Tue, Feb 27, 2007 at 02:26:30PM -0500, Don Munyak wrote:
I am having trouble using pkg_add -r some package. I keep getting
the following error.
---
p0069# pkg_add -r bash
Error: FTP Unable to get
Mark Jayson Alvarez [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I have several questions:
1. If I install a particular package, its dependencies will be
installed as well. Now if I remove it later using pkg_delete, only
that package will be removed and not the dependencies. The reason I
guess is because some
On Monday 23 October 2006 16:15, Lowell Gilbert wrote:
Mark Jayson Alvarez [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I have several questions:
1. If I install a particular package, its dependencies will be
installed as well. Now if I remove it later using pkg_delete, only
that package will be removed
RW wrote:
On Monday 23 October 2006 16:15, Lowell Gilbert wrote:
Mark Jayson Alvarez [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I have several questions:
1. If I install a particular package, its dependencies will be
installed as well. Now if I remove it later using pkg_delete, only
that package will be
On Monday 23 October 2006 03:07, Jonathan Horne wrote:
On Sunday 22 October 2006 20:52, Mark Jayson Alvarez wrote:
Hi,
I have several questions:
1. If I install a particular package, its dependencies will be
installed as well. Now if I remove it later using pkg_delete, only
that
On Monday 23 October 2006 20:48, Eric wrote:
RW wrote:
On Monday 23 October 2006 16:15, Lowell Gilbert wrote:
Mark Jayson Alvarez [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I have several questions:
1. If I install a particular package, its dependencies will be
installed as well. Now if I remove it
On Sunday 22 October 2006 20:52, Mark Jayson Alvarez wrote:
Hi,
I have several questions:
1. If I install a particular package, its dependencies will be
installed as well. Now if I remove it later using pkg_delete, only
that package will be removed and not the dependencies. The reason I
V.I.Victor wrote:
Generally -- is it OK to do a 'pkg_add' from
'packages-6-stable' to a 5.4 system?
Specifically, I think I need to update 'fetchmail.'
What I've read *seems* to indicate it's OK, but...
Thanks
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
V.I.Victor wrote:
Generally -- is it OK to do a 'pkg_add' from
'packages-6-stable' to a 5.4 system?
Specifically, I think I need to update 'fetchmail.'
What I've read *seems* to indicate it's OK, but...
Well I guess it works, but why not just cvsup your ports ( or use
portsnap ) and
Am 09.08.2006 um 15:43 schrieb V.I.Victor:
Generally -- is it OK to do a 'pkg_add' from
'packages-6-stable' to a 5.4 system?
No. You might get away with putting a 6-stable package on a 6.1
system, but only if you're lucky. Packages compiled for newer
releases will never* work on older
Am 09.08.2006 um 16:02 schrieb V.I.Victor:
This is a small machine that is only used as an email front-end.
When I built it I didn't install 'ports' -- sorry, I should have
mentioned that in the original post.
Install portsnap from your 5.4 CD, then use it to download the
current
V.I.Victor wrote:
Generally -- is it OK to do a 'pkg_add' from
'packages-6-stable' to a 5.4 system?
Specifically, I think I need to update 'fetchmail.'
What I've read *seems* to indicate it's OK, but...
Not a good idea. 6.x packages are going to want libc.so.6 and other
6.x shlibs, which
On Wed, Aug 09, 2006 at 01:43:10PM +, V.I.Victor wrote:
Generally -- is it OK to do a 'pkg_add' from
'packages-6-stable' to a 5.4 system?
Absolutely not.
Specifically, I think I need to update 'fetchmail.'
What's wrong with using packages-5-stable? :-)
What I've read *seems* to
-Original Message-
From: Kris Kennaway [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 9, 2006 03:02 PM
On Wed, Aug 09, 2006 at 01:43:10PM +, V.I.Victor wrote:
Generally -- is it OK to do a 'pkg_add' from
'packages-6-stable' to a 5.4 system?
Absolutely not.
Specifically, I
Remington L schrieb:
I have two servers, exact same hardware, exact same version of FreeBSD, in
this case 4.10. When I run pkg_add blah.tbz on one machine, it takes
between
2-8 hours, on the other 8-10 minutes. These machines are quad-Intel
2.8Xeons, with 4GB of memory.
Ive done everything
On Thursday 22 June 2006 10:22, Björn König wrote:
Remington L schrieb:
I have two servers, exact same hardware, exact same version of FreeBSD,
in this case 4.10. When I run pkg_add blah.tbz on one machine, it takes
between
2-8 hours, on the other 8-10 minutes. These machines are
On 6/22/06, Nikos Vassiliadis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thursday 22 June 2006 10:22, Björn König wrote:
Remington L schrieb:
I have two servers, exact same hardware, exact same version of
FreeBSD,
in this case 4.10. When I run pkg_add blah.tbz on one machine, it
takes
between
2-8
On Friday 05 May 2006 13:00, Jonathan Herriott wrote:
Hey,
I'm trying to add the package gnuplot, and when I do, it goes and tries to
add another necessary package pdflib. The issue is that it cannot find
pdflib. I get the following:
pkg_add -r gnuplot
Fetching
On Fri, May 05, 2006 at 05:00:46AM +, Jonathan Herriott wrote:
Hey,
I'm trying to add the package gnuplot, and when I do, it goes and tries to
add another necessary package pdflib. The issue is that it cannot find
pdflib. I get the following:
pkg_add -r gnuplot
Fetching
Thanks but:
pkg_add -r openoffice.org
pkg_add: can't stat package file 'openoffice.org'
that was the logical and first thing I tried.
On Mon, 1 May 2006, Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Sun, Apr 30, 2006 at 11:04:32PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
pkg_add -r openoffice.org-2.0.2.tbz
On Mon, 2006-05-01 at 03:12 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks but:
pkg_add -r openoffice.org
pkg_add: can't stat package file 'openoffice.org'
that was the logical and first thing I tried.
On Mon, 1 May 2006, Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Sun, Apr 30, 2006 at 11:04:32PM
On Monday 01 May 2006 02:31, robert wrote:
On Mon, 2006-05-01 at 03:12 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks but:
pkg_add -r openoffice.org
pkg_add: can't stat package file 'openoffice.org'
that was the logical and first thing I tried.
On Mon, 1 May 2006, Kris Kennaway
One of benefits of the BSD's at least my BSD, the Free one, is anyone can get a
pretty cool workstation by doing:
pkg_add -r xorg
pkg_add -r kde[-lite]
pkg_add -r anything-else-that-strikes-my-fancy
with a couple of configuration commands in between. I suspect the Linux people
that
On Mon, May 01, 2006 at 03:12:14AM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks but:
pkg_add -r openoffice.org
pkg_add: can't stat package file 'openoffice.org'
that was the logical and first thing I tried.
So look on the FTP site below and see what it's really called.
Kris
On Sun,
Installing the openoffice port is truly an odyssey and one I did not
successfully complete. Following the advise earlier in this thread, I abandoned
that effort and installed the package. The names for pkg_add are a mystery to me
as well. In an effort to get the correct name I walked the trees on
On Sun, Apr 30, 2006 at 11:04:32PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
pkg_add -r openoffice.org-2.0.2.tbz
You don't use the full versioned package name, you use the name in the
Latest/ directory, which is probably something like openoffice.org.
Error: FTP Unable to get
On Thu, Apr 06, 2006 at 06:22:17AM -0700, serguey ogoltsoff wrote:
When I tried to pkg_add make-3.79.1 the attempt failed
--NO RECORD.
My try to copy the file via
ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-5.3-release/Latest/make-3.79.1.tbz
was also a failure.
Then I sifted all
On Thursday 06 April 2006 06:22, serguey ogoltsoff wrote:
When I tried to pkg_add make-3.79.1 the attempt failed
--NO RECORD.
My try to copy the file via
ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-5.3-release/Lat
est/make-3.79.1.tbz
was also a failure.
Then I sifted all
On Thu, Apr 06, 2006 at 10:13:20AM -0700, Kent Stewart wrote:
On Thursday 06 April 2006 06:22, serguey ogoltsoff wrote:
When I tried to pkg_add make-3.79.1 the attempt failed
--NO RECORD.
My try to copy the file via
ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-5.3-release/Lat
On 3/21/06, David Armour [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
the handbook directions seem direct and specific. but
#pkg_add -r openoffice
...
produces:
Error: FTP Unable to get
ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-6-stable/Latest/openoffice.tbz:
File unavailable (e.g., file not
* David Armour [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hello,
the handbook directions seem direct and specific. but
#pkg_add -r openoffice
...
produces:
Error: FTP Unable to get
ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-6-stable/Latest/openoffice.tbz:
File unavailable (e.g., file not
On Tue, Mar 21, 2006 at 02:44:02PM -0800, David Armour wrote:
hello,
the handbook directions seem direct and specific. but
#pkg_add -r openoffice
...
produces:
Error: FTP Unable to get
ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-6-stable/Latest/openoffice.tbz:
File
Kenyon Ralph wrote:
On 3/21/06, David Armour [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
the handbook directions seem direct and specific. but
#pkg_add -r openoffice
...
produces:
Error: FTP Unable to get
ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-6-stable/Latest/openoffice.tbz:
File unavailable
On 3/21/06, David Armour [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
it's still fetching it, as we speak... (tip-toeing around) i installed
the port a few weeks ago on a different install, and it required 9gb.
is there a way to find out how much space the package needs / uses? i
got the impression that the
1 - 100 of 161 matches
Mail list logo
