Hello
Our mailhub is actually a HP DL360 with one processor (Xeon 2.8 ghz)
with 2 Gb RAM and 120 Gb disks, it is 3 years old.
It runs Postfix + imap + imaps + pop3 + pop3s + squirrelmail + vexira antivirus
+ postgrey
and some small auxiliary services.
We have approx 2500 users / mailboxes and
Frank Bonnet wrote:
[...]
I need SCSI Disks of course , budget is around 10K$
Why the insistence on SCSI? Is there any reason that SATA or RAID with
SATA is not acceptable? Just curious.
--
Gerard
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
* On 14/09/06 16:51 +0200, Frank Bonnet wrote:
| Hello
|
| Our mailhub is actually a HP DL360 with one processor (Xeon 2.8 ghz)
| with 2 Gb RAM and 120 Gb disks, it is 3 years old.
|
| It runs Postfix + imap + imaps + pop3 + pop3s + squirrelmail + vexira
| antivirus + postgrey
| and some small
Gerard Seibert wrote:
Frank Bonnet wrote:
[...]
I need SCSI Disks of course , budget is around 10K$
Why the insistence on SCSI? Is there any reason that SATA or RAID with
SATA is not acceptable? Just curious.
Because I want it
--
Cordialement
Frank Bonnet
In response to Frank Bonnet [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Gerard Seibert wrote:
Frank Bonnet wrote:
[...]
I need SCSI Disks of course , budget is around 10K$
Why the insistence on SCSI? Is there any reason that SATA or RAID with
SATA is not acceptable? Just curious.
Because I want it
--- Bill Moran [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In response to Frank Bonnet [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Gerard Seibert wrote:
Frank Bonnet wrote:
[...]
I need SCSI Disks of course , budget is around
10K$
Why the insistence on SCSI? Is there any reason
that SATA or RAID with
SATA is
Frank Bonnet wrote:
Gerard Seibert wrote:
Frank Bonnet wrote:
[...]
I need SCSI Disks of course , budget is around 10K$
Why the insistence on SCSI? Is there any reason that SATA or RAID with
SATA is not acceptable? Just curious.
Because I want it
I have yet to have a SATA drive last
SATA is still quite limited. To go beyond those limits use SAS, but SAS
costs even more than SCSI and is brand new technology.
-Derek
At 10:46 AM 9/14/2006, Bill Moran wrote:
In response to Frank Bonnet [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Gerard Seibert wrote:
Frank Bonnet wrote:
[...]
I
On Sep 14, 2006, at 10:28 AM, Derek Ragona wrote:
SATA is still quite limited. To go beyond those limits use SAS,
but SAS costs even more than SCSI and is brand new technology.
Get a 12 or 16 or 24 port Areca card and have a few hot spares and
you will see SATA fly for less money than
On 9/14/2006 10:32 AM, Odhiambo Washington wrote:
* On 14/09/06 16:51 +0200, Frank Bonnet wrote:
| Hello
|
| Our mailhub is actually a HP DL360 with one processor (Xeon 2.8 ghz)
| with 2 Gb RAM and 120 Gb disks, it is 3 years old.
|
| It runs Postfix + imap + imaps + pop3 + pop3s +
--On Thursday, September 14, 2006 11:45:49 -0500 Greg Groth
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Are any of the major server brands more FreeBSD friendly than others? I'm
looking to purchase a server for some web apps. Our current config is
running on a 6 year old Dell PowerEdge machine with SCSI RAID 5,
On Thu, Sep 14, 2006 at 11:56:24AM -0500, Paul Schmehl wrote:
--On Thursday, September 14, 2006 11:45:49 -0500 Greg Groth
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Are any of the major server brands more FreeBSD friendly than others? I'm
looking to purchase a server for some web apps. Our current config
Bill Moran wrote:
Has anyone every verified whether or not SATA has the problems that plagued
ATA? Such as crappy quality and lying caches?
Personally, I still demand SCSI on production servers because it still
seems as if:
a) The performance is still better
b) The reliability is still
| Our mailhub is actually a HP DL360 with one processor (Xeon 2.8 ghz)
| with 2 Gb RAM and 120 Gb disks, it is 3 years old.
| It runs Postfix + imap + imaps + pop3 + pop3s + squirrelmail + vexira
| antivirus + postgrey
| and some small auxiliary services.
Your server is good enough to
14 matches
Mail list logo
