Chuck Robey wrote:
JD Arnold wrote:
Danial Thom wrote:
--- Vladimir Tsvetkov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is obviously a trick question, because
real
programmers don't use IDEs. Case Closed.
I'm not a real programmer, but UNIX is a great
developer environment.
It's a tool based
On 2006-01-14 13:00, JD Arnold [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Chuck Robey wrote:
At one point in my career (in school, lisp programming) I
learned/used emacs. I admit, it's got so much power, there
isn't even a close competitor. BUT at that time, I had a
genius girl programmer at my side, and
On 2006-01-09 15:30, Chuck Robey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
JD Arnold wrote:
That's why you should graduate to Emacs - with the makefile syntax
highlighting, you'll at least see the differences between tabs and
spaces before getting into trouble due to bad whitespacing!-)
you're certainly
--- Giorgos Keramidas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On 2006-01-09 15:30, Chuck Robey
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
JD Arnold wrote:
That's why you should graduate to Emacs -
with the makefile syntax
highlighting, you'll at least see the
differences between tabs and
spaces before getting into
--- Vladimir Tsvetkov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is obviously a trick question, because
real
programmers don't use IDEs. Case Closed.
I'm not a real programmer, but UNIX is a great
developer environment.
It's a tool based environment.
Small tools, strong cohesion in what they are
Danial Thom wrote:
--- Vladimir Tsvetkov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is obviously a trick question, because
real
programmers don't use IDEs. Case Closed.
I'm not a real programmer, but UNIX is a great
developer environment.
It's a tool based environment.
Small tools, strong cohesion in
Le 08/01/2006 à 18:37:33+0100, Kiffin Gish a écrit
On Sun, 2006-01-08 at 12:26 -0500, Michael P. Soulier wrote:
On 08/01/06 Ross Lonstein said:
*cough* xemacs *cough*
Great OS, but he wanted an editor. ;-)
Flame away :)
Hey, you asked for it. :)
Mike
Yes please:
JD Arnold wrote:
Danial Thom wrote:
--- Vladimir Tsvetkov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is obviously a trick question, because
real
programmers don't use IDEs. Case Closed.
I'm not a real programmer, but UNIX is a great
developer environment.
It's a tool based environment.
Small
On 1/9/06, Chuck Robey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
you're certainly giving a viewpoint that has a great deal of truth to
it, but I guess what scares folks is the horrible, horrible emacs
learning curve,. At one point in my career (in school, lisp
programming) I learned/used emacs. I admit, it's
I've played around with Anjuta and Code::Blocks and was wondering what
is the preferred open source C/C++ IDE available for advanced users.
Pros and cons etc. would be greatly appreciated.
--
Kiffin Gish [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
On Sun, Jan 08, 2006 at 04:43:49PM +0100, Kiffin Gish wrote:
I've played around with Anjuta and Code::Blocks and was wondering what
is the preferred open source C/C++ IDE available for advanced users.
*cough* xemacs *cough*
Pros and cons etc. would be greatly appreciated.
Flame away :)
-
On 08/01/06 Ross Lonstein said:
*cough* xemacs *cough*
Great OS, but he wanted an editor. ;-)
Flame away :)
Hey, you asked for it. :)
Mike
--
Michael P. Soulier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Any intelligent fool can make things bigger and more complex... It takes a
touch of genius - and a lot of
On Sun, 2006-01-08 at 12:26 -0500, Michael P. Soulier wrote:
On 08/01/06 Ross Lonstein said:
*cough* xemacs *cough*
Great OS, but he wanted an editor. ;-)
Flame away :)
Hey, you asked for it. :)
Mike
Yes please: an editor plus integrated compile/build and debugger.
--
Kiffin
Kiffin Gish wrote:
I've played around with Anjuta and Code::Blocks and was wondering what
is the preferred open source C/C++ IDE available for advanced users.
Pros and cons etc. would be greatly appreciated.
What would be the best IDE can I nor anybody else on this list tell you,
it's a
*cough* xemacs *cough*
Great OS, but he wanted an editor. ;-)
Flame away :)
Hey, you asked for it. :)
Mike
Yes please: an editor plus integrated compile/build and debugger.
vim, emacs + make + gcc is all you need.
___
--- Kiffin Gish [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've played around with Anjuta and Code::Blocks
and was wondering what
is the preferred open source C/C++ IDE
available for advanced users.
Pros and cons etc. would be greatly
appreciated.
This is obviously a trick question, because real
This is obviously a trick question, because real
programmers don't use IDEs. Case Closed.
I'm not a real programmer, but UNIX is a great developer environment.
It's a tool based environment.
Small tools, strong cohesion in what they are designed for, easy ways
to combine them to form more
On 08/01/06 Vladimir Tsvetkov said:
To me the ideal IDE is actually a toolkit:
I believe Unix's original name was PTB, the Programmer's ToolBox. Hence why
Unix usually _is_ my IDE.
Mike
--
Michael P. Soulier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Any intelligent fool can make things bigger and more complex... It
18 matches
Mail list logo
