Hi,
since there has been various issues building LibreOffice from
ports lately and not everyone can or wants follow all the patches
flying around, I'd like to share that the Linux binary build runs
fine for me.
I downloaded Linux' x86 tar package, did tar xf to get RPMs
and finally:
for i in
ports lately and not everyone can or wants follow all the patches
flying around, I'd like to share that the Linux binary build runs
fine for me.
I downloaded Linux' x86 tar package, did tar xf to get RPMs
and finally:
for i in *rpm; do rpm2cpio $i | cpio -ivd; done
That created
On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 7:11 AM, Wojciech Puchar
woj...@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl wrote:
ports lately and not everyone can or wants follow all the patches
flying around, I'd like to share that the Linux binary build runs
[...]
May this help someone lazy or impatient like me...
what's wrong
On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 2:41 AM, Vaclav Kadlcik kro...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
since there has been various issues building LibreOffice from
ports lately and not everyone can or wants follow all the patches
flying around, I'd like to share that the Linux binary build runs
fine for me.
I
Vaclav Kadlcik writes:
since there has been various issues building LibreOffice from
ports lately and not everyone can or wants follow all the patches
flying around, I'd like to share that the Linux binary build runs
fine for me.
Excellent work.
Two questions:
1)
what's wrong in /usr/ports/editors/openoffice-3
Oracle
oracle donated everything to apache foundation.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to
On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 8:02 AM, Wojciech Puchar
woj...@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl wrote:
what's wrong in /usr/ports/editors/openoffice-3
Oracle
oracle donated everything to apache foundation.
Yes, but not before creating a big mess, stagnating development and
forcing the core team out of
On 07/19/12 09:41, Vaclav Kadlcik wrote:
Hi,
since there has been various issues building LibreOffice from
ports lately and not everyone can or wants follow all the patches
flying around, I'd like to share that the Linux binary build runs
fine for me.
I downloaded Linux' x86 tar package, did
Alexander Kapshuk writes:
Just upgraded libreoffice to version 3.5.5 using ports. Didn't have any
trouble installing is, nor upgrading it.
deletia
What sort of errors did you encounter while building the package using
the ports?
Check the last few weeks of office@
On 07/19/12 15:46, Robert Huff wrote:
Check the last few weeks of office@ and ports@; there are multiple
people (including me) reporting problems, especially with 9.recent and
-Current. Robert Huff
Could be because I'm running the RELEASE version then.
Alejandro == Alejandro Imass a...@p2ee.org writes:
Alejandro Yes, but not before creating a big mess, stagnating
Alejandro development and forcing the core team out of Oracle to create
Alejandro LO and I guess [pure speculation] that in the end it
Alejandro backfired and Larry (aka we'll simply
What sort of errors did you encounter while building the package using
the ports?
The first problem is that it now demands clang-devel, which conflicts
with chromium which still wants regular clang.
Any idea how likely it is that chromium will build if I tell it to use
clang-devel?
R's,
John
The only good thing they seem *not* to have screwed with is VirtualBox.
not really. The backend part of virtualbox is great.
The frontend with is UUIDS for everything, XML and other trash is plain
terrible. But still - nothing better exist for the need now.
13 matches
Mail list logo
