There has indeed been a higher spam:ham ratio on this list of late,
however making it subscriber-only won't help. The crims need only
spoof the address of someone subscribed to the list to bypass that,
and I suspect a few spammers have registered using false addresses
anyway (leading to a bounce
On 06/09/2013 11:21, Jerry wrote:
On Fri, 6 Sep 2013 09:32:39 +0100
Graham Todd articulated:
Isn't this pure SPAM?
Why yes it is. Would you prefer it mixed with non-spam to make it more
palatable?
Seriously, the ration of spam to non-spam is increasing exponentially
on this list. Until
, anti-spam challenges etc
Yes, an incorrectly configured MTA or one of its milters.
Not especially
There are
ways to deal with these assholes.
Only some of it, and there's no general way of dealing with the
out-of-list component.
Allowing a blanket open-door
policy is like setting file
brain dead that he/she
could not comprehend how to subscribe to the mailing list then I would
seriously doubt that they would possess the necessary skills to install
and run FreeBSD to begin with.
Lets be honest here. All that the present system does is act as an
enabler for Spam merchants
also found it quite useful to note the email addresses of
obvious spammers and block them at the MTA, because they'll often
step through *all* the mailing lists sequentially and it becomes
tedious to discard the same spam over and over. Blocking at the MTA
alleviates this problem.
Another way to put
. All that
the present system does is act as an enabler for Spam merchants and
Trolls.
Yes, seriously. Have you seen the number of people who post messages
PLEASE REMOVE ME FROM THIS MAILING LIST!!, apparently not
understanding how to manage their subscription?
--
Bruce Cran
to install and run FreeBSD to begin with. Lets be honest here. All
that the present system does is act as an enabler for Spam
merchants and Trolls.
Yes, seriously. Have you seen the number of people who post messages
PLEASE REMOVE ME FROM THIS MAILING LIST!!, apparently not
understanding
seriously doubt that they would possess the
necessary skills to install and run FreeBSD to begin with. Lets
be honest here. All that the present system does is act as an
enabler for Spam merchants and Trolls.
Yes, seriously. Have you seen the number of people who post
messages PLEASE
with backscatter. Now, if they
do have a maladjusted MTA, they have more problems then just
subscribing to a list.
Out of Office replies, sieve rejects, anti-spam challenges etc
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman
is running an incorrectly
configured MTA, I don't see a problem with backscatter. Now, if
they do have a maladjusted MTA, they have more problems then just
subscribing to a list.
Out of Office replies, sieve rejects, anti-spam challenges etc
Yes, an incorrectly configured MTA or one of its
On 05/17/2013 05:45, Jerry wrote:
On Fri, 17 May 2013 13:19:32 +0100
It seems to me that the level of spam in list is pretty much
negligible.
That would be a subjective statement. It is like asking how many times
you have to slap your wife before you are considered a wife beater
On Fri, 2013-05-17 at 10:53 -0700, Robison, Dave wrote:
All this bike shedding and crosstalk has produced far more pointless
email than all the spam I've gotten from this list in the last month.
I don't know if those mails where pointless, but there were much mails
and I only read two or three
On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 10:53:39AM -0700, Robison, Dave wrote:
This has gotten to the point of the ridiculous now. Comparing a few spam to
wife beating and serial killers? That's just patently offensive, quite
frankly.
All this bike shedding and crosstalk has produced far more pointless
On 11/05/2013 02:34, Julian H. Stacey wrote:
Good question. I don't know why. I wish all were, it would keep spam out.
There have been some discussions about this in the past.
freebsd-questions doesn't require subscribing to avoid people who may be
unfamiliar with mailing lists being put off
Bruce Cran wrote:
On 11/05/2013 02:34, Julian H. Stacey wrote:
Good question. I don't know why. I wish all were, it would keep spam out.
There have been some discussions about this in the past.
freebsd-questions doesn't require subscribing to avoid people who may be
unfamiliar
Hi,
On Thu, 16 May 2013 23:05:33 +0100
Bruce Cran br...@cran.org.uk wrote:
On 11/05/2013 02:34, Julian H. Stacey wrote:
Good question. I don't know why. I wish all were, it would keep
spam out.
There have been some discussions about this in the past.
freebsd-questions doesn't require
you can't do anything about
and so forth (so its not simply just a matter of subscribe, unsubscribe as
noted). Unfortunately, many see it as a spam filter and thereby abuse it. How
often do you need help with an issue with libreoffice, mozilla whatever, or
other application? And yet
On 05/12/13 22:04, Rich Kulawiec wrote:
1. Restricting mailing lists to subscribers only has been a best
practice since the last century. It's a very good anti-spam tactic.
2. However, doing so -- for a list run via Mailman, like this one --
does not pose a significant impediment for non
domain.
But I use the same From: address.
I switched my email address on this list because Insight Cable, but I believe
not Time Warner Cable, uses synacor.com for spam filtering, and messages are
deleted when synacor.com's software flags it as spam, and there were false
positives resulting
On Sat, 11 May 2013 19:44:46 +0200
Julian H. Stacey j...@berklix.com wrote:
Hi,
Steve O'Hara-Smith wrote:
On Thu, 09 May 2013 02:26:26 +0200
Julian H. Stacey j...@berklix.com wrote:
If list write access was changed to Subscribers Only:
- List could silently discard such spam
was changed to Subscribers Only:
- List could silently discard such spam.
- Postmaster@ ( webmaster@ weeding web archives) would have
less work.
- Less individual need to select spam phrases to copy to
personal filters ( less time searching WTF dialect American
above meant
1. Restricting mailing lists to subscribers only has been a best
practice since the last century. It's a very good anti-spam tactic.
2. However, doing so -- for a list run via Mailman, like this one --
does not pose a significant impediment for non-subscribers. By default,
Mailman will hold
On Thu, 09 May 2013 02:26:26 +0200
Julian H. Stacey j...@berklix.com wrote:
If list write access was changed to Subscribers Only:
- List could silently discard such spam.
- Postmaster@ ( webmaster@ weeding web archives) would have less work.
- Less individual need to select spam
Hi,
Steve O'Hara-Smith wrote:
On Thu, 09 May 2013 02:26:26 +0200
Julian H. Stacey j...@berklix.com wrote:
If list write access was changed to Subscribers Only:
- List could silently discard such spam.
- Postmaster@ ( webmaster@ weeding web archives) would have less work.
- Less
was changed to Subscribers Only:
- List could silently discard such spam.
- Postmaster@ ( webmaster@ weeding web archives) would have less
work.
- Less individual need to select spam phrases to copy to personal
filters
( less time searching WTF dialect American above meant in English
I'm curious how much spam you get through this list.
Just counted, and I have about 2 Spams per week for the last month,
that's more than usual.
Personaly I'm on ~ 47 freebsd lists or so my MH dirs + procmail
filter boxes suggest, so when someone spams multiple lists with the
same spam
are like this anyway. Why are not all like this?
Good question. I don't know why. I wish all were, it would keep spam out.
To allow a free-er environment for us than that might first give:
Taking the syntax of majordomo as an example to illustrate an idea in
(I know Freebsd.org moved
: 1368039547.0568389241738...@mf7.sendgrid.net
Happy hump-day,
We have an opportunity with an RTB partner to monetize
INT Geo's; UK, CAN, AUS
Video: (Pre-roll, mid-roll and post-roll)
If list write access was changed to Subscribers Only:
- List could silently discard such spam
Most of the spam I've seen get through is actually obvious from the
subject line. I've seen more posts by people who weren't subscribed and
asked to be cc'd than I've seen spam. Making the list subscribers only
would only hinder the the lucky spammers, and stop more people genuinely
asking
Hi,
On Thu, 09 May 2013 02:26:26 +0200
Julian H. Stacey j...@berklix.com wrote:
If list write access was changed to Subscribers Only:
some lists are like this anyway. Why are not all like this?
I notice that my postings get delayed and obviously check when I use
by accident my real e-mail
The original trying freeBSD 9.1 [...] mail is spam, since the original
message had a signature about face lifting or something like that.
Take a look at
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/2013-March/249992.html
Once you visited the page from the link in the signature, you even
I've been down this road recently with 9.1-release. I ended up adding these
lines to end of my script
## The next two are hacks in my book, without the last line, on reboot
## it gets stuck trying to find zfs:zroot/ROOT, but somehow the -f or reboot
fixes
# this quirk
zpool export zroot
On 02/26/2013 04:31 PM, Chad M Stewart wrote:
I've been down this road recently with 9.1-release. I ended up adding these
lines to end of my script
## The next two are hacks in my book, without the last line, on reboot
## it gets stuck trying to find zfs:zroot/ROOT, but somehow the -f or
On 02/25/2013 10:00 am, bw wrote:
That was my understanding, too, but the instructions on the wiki say
there's no need to copy the cache file. In fact, there is no cache
file to copy, since the pool is created with
zpool create -o altroot=/mnt -O canmount=off zroot mirror
/dev/gpt/g0zfs
FreeBSD emailing lists are not spammers, though they let some spams through
that their filters miss.
Insight Cable uses synacor.com spam-filtering (dis)service that the Insight
Cable user can't turn off.
This remedy is worse than the disease in my case because it causes bounces, and
then my
Hello,
while testing a new mail configuration on freebsd-test@, I noticed a
very interesting part in the header, which I just paste
Old-X-HE-Spam-Score: -2.3
Old-X-HE-Spam-Report: Content analysis details: (-2.3 points)
pts rule name description
Old-X-HE-Spam-Score: -2.3
Old-X-HE-Spam-Report: Content analysis details: (-2.3 points)
pts rule name description
--
-- -2.3
RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org
Please don't reply to spam, since this makes it harder to detect spam by
software.
Happy New Year!
Ralf
PS: I've broken the thread intendedly.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
not. The reason for the
open list is that questions@ has been given as a support address in
documents, and some feel that should remain open.
Should we move to a list where only registered users can write just to
avoid the spam problem and not forcing a human to approve all e-mails
from addresses
, it worked.
Should we move to a list where only registered users can write just to
avoid the spam problem and not forcing a human to approve all e-mails
from addresses which are not registered?
Erich
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http
played games on.
it is long-gone:)
you do not even know then what these people go through.
Let me see what you got.
yup, exactly. these sorry, pathetic guys see an easy way to
spam and do it. ... .
They have meet month's end.
They needed the money ...
Erich
. This is an English-speaking mailing list.
I wonder how many people did what I did an classified this as spam.
Erich
___
Aloha Erich,
I'm getting SPAM on the FreeBSD list for a couple of days now.
In several languages including Chinese
release à venir et sa
date de sortie
http://www.freebsd.org/releases/9.1R/schedule.html
PS. This is an English-speaking mailing list.
I wonder how many people did what I did an classified this as spam.
Erich
___
Aloha Erich,
I'm
. but at the bottom
of this email I will enclose an arabic [i think!] email. if you
can gleen anything from it, excellent. I get other *non*-8859
iso encoded email. {Note that I still use mutt as my mua. until
all this spam, I did not know that mutt could even
it, excellent. I get other *non*-8859
iso encoded email. {Note that I still use mutt as my mua.
until all this spam, I did not know that mutt could even render non-
Latin characters.
Let me see what you got.
for my appending the spam that I got from wherever. it
might
encoded email. {Note that I still use mutt as my mua.
until all this spam, I did not know that mutt could even render non-
Latin characters.
Let me see what you got.
for my appending the spam that I got from wherever. it
might have been sent from Anywhere.
It looks to me
what I did an classified this as spam.
Erich
___
Aloha Erich,
I'm getting SPAM on the FreeBSD list for a couple of days now.
In several languages including Chinese and French as well as English.
Doesnt our list have a way to block so much
Hi Al,
On Wed, 10 Oct 2012 17:06:11 -1000
Al Plant n...@hdk5.net wrote:
Erich Dollansky wrote:
I wonder how many people did what I did an classified this as spam.
Aloha Erich,
my wife loves you. This is for sure. Why? She loves your place.
I'm getting SPAM on the FreeBSD list
Anyone offended by this spam to the mailing-list is strongly encouraged
to call the company to complain -- TOLL FREE numbers are:
U.S.A. 1-800-457-3801 (headquarters)
Europe +00800 4573 8000(Germany)
Asia (010) 800.40402026 (Japan)
Asia 00798.1.1.002.0297 (S
--As of December 23, 2011 5:45:42 PM +0100, Bas Smeelen is alleged to have
said:
While I'm writing, a note to freebsd-update users:
FreeBSD-SA-11:07.chroot has a rather messy fix involving adding a new
interface to libc; this has the awkward side effect of causing the sizes
of some symbols
-questi...@freebsd.org Sun Jun 19 01:09:13 2011
From: Netlog notification+f34709...@netlogmail.com
To: Elias Shashati freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2011 06:07:46 +
Subject: New games for you
Hi Elias! Try out these new games!
[[ sneck spam content
On Sun, 19 Jun 2011 04:52:15 -0500 (CDT)
Robert Bonomi bon...@mail.r-bonomi.com articulated:
Anybody running procmail who is tired of this Netlog cr*p (thanks to
one Elias Shashati, who subscribed the questions mailing list to
their service) is welcome to use the procmail recipe that I have
On 19/06/2011 12:38, Jerry wrote:
Interestingly enough, WOThttp://www.mywot.com/ rates that site very
poor and displays a warning when it is visited.
I suspect some people like reporting sites as bad. Mine was reported as
not safe: has the trojan virus and I had to ask Norton to re-check it
From owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org Sun Jun 19 06:38:27 2011
Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2011 07:38:05 -0400
From: Jerry je...@seibercom.net
To: FreeBSD freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: {SPAM} New games for you
On Sun, 19 Jun 2011 04:52:15 -0500 (CDT)
Robert Bonomi bon...@mail.r
I have begun receiving ipv6 spam from this mailing list, and I was
wondering how to determine who the owner of a particular ipv6 address
is.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
On Sat, May 21, 2011 at 9:28 AM, Robert Simmons rsimmo...@gmail.com wrote:
I have begun receiving ipv6 spam from this mailing list, and I was
wondering how to determine who the owner of a particular ipv6 address
is.
A whois may tell you who the block has been given too (ISP wise) ... that
may
) and live with this spam and just
delete the message (take care to not mark it as spam, while GMail's SPAM
filter is smart, it is by no means intelligent, marking it as spam would
flag more then just *THAT* e-mail's headers as spam, it would flag the whole
thread, including f-q@.)
2) Your second
In the last week I got four emails like this one today:
From: a href=mailto:br...@cran.org.uk;br...@cran.org.uk/abr/
To: a href=mailto:per...@pluto.rain.com;per...@pluto.rain.com/abr/
CC: a href=mailto:free...@edvax.de;free...@edvax.de/a, a
href=mailto:lum...@gmail.com;lum...@gmail.com/a, a
On Sun, 2011-03-13 at 06:49 -0500, ajtiM wrote:
In the last week I got four emails like this one today:
From: a href=mailto:br...@cran.org.uk;br...@cran.org.uk/abr/
To: a href=mailto:per...@pluto.rain.com;per...@pluto.rain.com/abr/
CC: a href=mailto:free...@edvax.de;free...@edvax.de/a, a
In freebsd-questions Digest, Vol 353, Issue 11, Message: 4
On Sun, 13 Mar 2011 11:57:03 + Bruce Cran br...@cran.org.uk wrote:
On Sun, 2011-03-13 at 06:49 -0500, ajtiM wrote:
In the last week I got four emails like this one today:
From: a
to you my logical analysis of
your link, analysed by item:
Rule #0: Spam is theft.
Mail servers are offering a service. If you don't want to receive spam
stop offering the service.
Angel's Commentary: Spammers believe it's okay to steal a little bit
from each person on the Internet at once
snip
OMFG... how much longer are we going to keep commenting on this worthless
thread? And now the debian list too? That's great...
Dear Hijacker: You are the superior one, all others are inferior. You are
right, all others are wrong. Please go away. Perhaps preach your wisdom to
a more
On 28/01/11 16:15, Robert Bonomi wrote:
From elb...@gmail.com Fri Jan 28 08:59:21 2011
On 28/01/11 12:28, Robert Bonomi wrote:
see: http://www.pearlgates.net/nanae/rulesofspam.shtmld
Rule #0: Spam is theft.
Mail servers are offering a service. If you don't want to receive
spam stop
, we no longer care about your opinion or what
it means because you clearly don't care about our opinion for you to change
the subject and get on a topic for this list.
Speaking of topics ... just because a mailing list is open for you to send
mail to DOES NOT MEAN YOU CAN SPAM IT WITH NONSENSE
Hi,
OMFG... how much longer are we going to keep commenting on this
worthless thread? And now the debian list too? That's great...
Agreed :-)
Debian list dropped as cross posting bad.
Individual cc's dropped as one is the troll, other don't need copies.
For those new to this FreeBSD list
On 28/01/11 16:07, Gary Gatten wrote:
snip
Oh dear.
OMFG... how much longer are we going to keep commenting on this
worthless thread?
Hmm. Worthless... without value... an entity lacking substance. Hmm.
This thread was started by me. Now let me see, yes, I still have my
arms and legs.
I came from my mother, just as you came from yours. I am not sorry you
are unable to accept that my opinion differs from yours, and I hope that
we resolve this.
I came from a test tube.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
Original Message
From: elb...@gmail.com
To: ggat...@waddell.com
Subject: Re: Spam Rules, per argument (Re: Any package for surveys?)
Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2011 16:43:12 +
On 28/01/11 16:07, Gary Gatten wrote:
snip
Oh dear.
OMFG... how much longer are we going to keep commenting
I know its a little OT, but I'm hunting for a mainboard to plug this CPU
into and build a file server. So the ideal specs are (and maybe dreaming
too :) ):
184 pin RAM DIMM
SataIII 4+ ports
Either onboard or AGP Video
2x Gigabit LAN
Obviously I don't need much RAM, just juice the throughput
I know its a little OT, but I'm hunting for a mainboard to plug this CPU
into and build a file server. So the ideal specs are (and maybe dreaming
too :) ):
184 pin RAM DIMM
SataIII 4+ ports
Either onboard or AGP Video
2x Gigabit LAN
Obviously I don't need much RAM, just juice the throughput
On 23 December 2010 08:23, Da Rock
freebsd-questi...@herveybayaustralia.com.au wrote:
I know its a little OT, but I'm hunting for a mainboard to plug this CPU
into and build a file server. So the ideal specs are (and maybe dreaming too
:) ):
184 pin RAM DIMM
SataIII 4+ ports
Either onboard
On 12/23/10 21:36, Chris Rees wrote:
On 23 December 2010 08:23, Da Rock
freebsd-questi...@herveybayaustralia.com.au wrote:
I know its a little OT, but I'm hunting for a mainboard to plug this CPU
into and build a file server. So the ideal specs are (and maybe dreaming too
:) ):
184 pin
On 23 December 2010 11:44, Da Rock
freebsd-questi...@herveybayaustralia.com.au wrote:
snip
Thanks, but Athlon64 is a 939. Yeah, it may not be worth salvaging, but I
thought the cost might be less... I'm more than likely wrong. Worth putting
feelers out, though :)
Athlon64s can be 754, 939 or
On 12/23/10 23:16, Chris Rees wrote:
On 23 December 2010 11:44, Da Rock
freebsd-questi...@herveybayaustralia.com.au wrote:
snip
Thanks, but Athlon64 is a 939. Yeah, it may not be worth salvaging, but I
thought the cost might be less... I'm more than likely wrong. Worth putting
feelers out,
On 12/23/10 13:57, Da Rock wrote:
I've got wholesale contacts, but I was hoping to make use of this spare
chip and RAM floating about. Diff would be around $100, so only kinda
worth it.
It might be worth looking at Intel Atom processor boards or similar,
there are plenty of very low power
On 23 December 2010 13:57, Da Rock
freebsd-questi...@herveybayaustralia.com.au wrote:
On 12/23/10 23:16, Chris Rees wrote:
On 23 December 2010 11:44, Da Rock
freebsd-questi...@herveybayaustralia.com.au wrote:
snip
Thanks, but Athlon64 is a 939. Yeah, it may not be worth salvaging, but I
On Thu, 23 Dec 2010 18:23:30 +1000
Da Rock freebsd-questi...@herveybayaustralia.com.au wrote:
I know its a little OT, but I'm hunting for a mainboard to plug this
CPU into and build a file server. So the ideal specs are (and maybe
dreaming too :) ):
184 pin RAM DIMM
SataIII 4+ ports
On 12/24/10 01:44, Chris Rees wrote:
On 23 December 2010 13:57, Da Rock
freebsd-questi...@herveybayaustralia.com.au wrote:
On 12/23/10 23:16, Chris Rees wrote:
On 23 December 2010 11:44, Da Rock
freebsd-questi...@herveybayaustralia.com.auwrote:
snip
Thanks, but
Hello *,
does someone get this kind of spam too?
Thanks, Greetings and nice Day/Evening
Michelle Konzack
- Forwarded message from freebsd-questions@freebsd.org -
Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2010 07:55:59 +1100
From: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
To: Michelle Konzack bsd4miche...@tamay
On Thu, 16 Dec 2010 12:40:35 +0100
Michelle Konzack bsd4miche...@tamay-dogan.net wrote:
does someone get this kind of spam too?
Yes, lots of people have been getting that for a few months.
parklogic claim there's not anything they can do about it despite it
apparently coming from their servers
bsd4miche...@tamay-dogan.net
wrote:
Hello *,
does someone get this kind of spam too?
Thanks, Greetings and nice Day/Evening
Michelle Konzack
- Forwarded message from freebsd-questions@freebsd.org -
Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2010 07:55:59 +1100
From: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Yes, I'm too! Spam from the list!
On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 6:40 PM, Michelle Konzack
bsd4miche...@tamay-dogan.net wrote:
Hello *,
does someone get this kind of spam too?
Thanks, Greetings and nice Day/Evening
Michelle Konzack
- Forwarded message from freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Re: freebsd-questions Digest, Vol 341, Issue 6, Message: 27
On Thu, 16 Dec 2010 11:44:09 + Bruce Cran br...@cran.org.uk wrote:
On Thu, 16 Dec 2010 12:40:35 +0100
Michelle Konzack bsd4miche...@tamay-dogan.net wrote:
does someone get this kind of spam too?
Yes, lots of people have
On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 12:40:35PM +0100, Michelle Konzack wrote:
Hello *,
does someone get this kind of spam too?
Yes. Lots of it from various lists and other paths.
Just delete it.
jerry
Thanks, Greetings and nice Day/Evening
Michelle Konzack
- Forwarded message
2010-12-16 12:40, Michelle Konzack:
Hello *,
does someone get this kind of spam too?
No, nothing from the ip-range 69.170.128.0/24 is getting thru.
Thanks, Greetings and nice Day/Evening
Michelle Konzack
- Forwarded message from freebsd-questions@freebsd.org -
Date: Mon, 15
On 16.12.2010 19:56, Bernt Hansson wrote:
2010-12-16 12:40, Michelle Konzack:
Hello *,
does someone get this kind of spam too?
No, nothing from the ip-range 69.170.128.0/24 is getting thru.
I actually have a very specific route, just for them, in my border gateway:
ip route 64.38.11.26
2010-12-16 19:59, Sven Skogen (List mail account):
On 16.12.2010 19:56, Bernt Hansson wrote:
2010-12-16 12:40, Michelle Konzack:
Hello *,
does someone get this kind of spam too?
No, nothing from the ip-range 69.170.128.0/24 is getting thru.
I actually have a very specific route, just
it an
excellent example. Obviously, I've masked addresses but the point is the
same, g-mail doesn't give much in the way of detail. Short of flagging one
item as spam has the potential risk of sending all FreeBSD-Questions mail to
the spam folder which is just a swirling vortex of nothingness
On Sat, 11 Dec 2010 10:41:48 -0500
Chris Brennan xa...@xaerolimit.net wrote:
Does GMail provide access to the full headers?
Click the down arrow and select Show original.
--
Bruce Cran
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
On Sat, Dec 11, 2010 at 11:24 AM, Bruce Cran br...@cran.org.uk wrote:
On Sat, 11 Dec 2010 10:41:48 -0500
Chris Brennan xa...@xaerolimit.net wrote:
Does GMail provide access to the full headers?
Click the down arrow and select Show original.
--
Bruce Cran
Awesome! Thanks Bruce. Now I
On Sat, 11 Dec 2010 11:30:19 -0500, Chris Brennan wrote:
On Sat, Dec 11, 2010 at 11:24 AM, Bruce Cran br...@cran.org.uk wrote:
On Sat, 11 Dec 2010 10:41:48 -0500
Chris Brennan xa...@xaerolimit.net wrote:
Does GMail provide access to the full headers?
Click the down arrow
In freebsd-questions Digest, Vol 340, Issue 11, Message: 27
On Fri, 10 Dec 2010 00:54:37 -0500
On Sun, Nov 7, 2010 at 9:54 AM, Paul B Mahol one...@gmail.com wrote:
No, he didn't. These mails are FORGED as being from freebsd-questions
participants, and on first glance may appear to be list
:
On 12/10/10, Chris Brennan xa...@xaerolimit.net wrote:
Umm... what's the dea w/ this? More spam?
Not my spam.
If you still think that I actually really send this to you I can not help
you.
Well no Paul, I wasn't blaming you directly, I I just noticed that a lot of
mail last night had
email addresses has happened for years, and with this list's archives
being publicly available online it's been happening for a while and will
continue to happen until the rules may or may not be changed.
--
Ryan
If this discussion is about the same wave of spam I've been getting
examples
SMTP user/password
with mail.clinet_domain.com as incoming/outgoing.
even if they send from x...@client_domain to ad...@mydomain.com
both are in same server, I will still receive it as SPAM.
(They are sending from outlook.)
When someone is an authorized user of email, ie, they login
dynamic IP networks. You may trust them not to be a spam source
but putting them into your internal_networks list would create a false positive
because then those dynamic IPs would be searched for in the DUL lists. This is
an example where the two lists need to be different.
If need be, also
From owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org Sat Oct 23 17:45:25 2010
From: Marwan Sultan dead_l...@hotmail.com
To: m.sea...@infracaninophile.co.uk
Date: Sat, 23 Oct 2010 22:46:40 +
Cc: FreeBSD Questions freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: RE: My mail server flagged spam!
Dear Dr
Marwan Sultan dead_l...@hotmail.com writes:
Hello list..
Well! im kinda lost here..
I have like 8 domains hosted in my server. FreeBSD 7.2R, (...)
I have few customers complaining that thier emails (...)
Anyhints please?
Well, i think you should move to Google Apps. It's very
Dear Dr. Matthew.,
When my client or any clients uses the web mail that i have configured,
then everything works fine NO spam problems and email will be
received by hotmail, gmail and vise versa.
I found out that this particular client complaining because they use
outlook
On Oct 23, 2010, at 3:46 PM, Marwan Sultan wrote:
they configure their outlook express to use SMTP user/password
with mail.clinet_domain.com as incoming/outgoing.
even if they send from x...@client_domain to ad...@mydomain.com
both are in same server, I will still receive it as SPAM
1 - 100 of 885 matches
Mail list logo
