-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Michael David Crawford wrote:
Frank Bonnet wrote:
It seems ZFS would match his needs , why don't use it ?
Does ZFS really work on FreeBSD? It seems like every day someone is
posting about ZFS either getting corrupted or panicking their kernel.
Mike
The only way to be sure is to test it , I've read at 7.2 it has reached
stability.
As long as there is no recovery tool for ZFS it cannot be treated safe.
In SUNs theory it just can't fail - which is nonsense unless machines are
perfect and you'll never experience hardware problems.
On Wednesday 10 June 2009 21:06:06 Karl Vogel wrote:
Create 256 folders named 00-ff:
#!/bin/sh
hex='0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 a b c d e f'
for x in $hex ; do
for y in $hex ; do
mkdir ${x}${y}
done
done
exit 0
Or use
On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 10:17:02PM -0700, Michael David Crawford wrote:
Frank Bonnet wrote:
It seems ZFS would match his needs , why don't use it ?
Does ZFS really work on FreeBSD? It seems like every day someone is
posting about ZFS either getting corrupted or panicking their kernel.
It
On Tue, 9 Jun 2009 03:10:46 am Matthew Seaman wrote:
M Or store your data in a RDBMS rather than in the filesystem.
On Tue, 9 Jun 2009 09:45:48 -0500, Kirk Strauser k...@strauser.com said:
K Hear, hear. I'm hard pressed to imagine why you'd need 100M 1KB files.
DBs are great when you have
On 6/8/09, Kelly Jones kelly.terry.jo...@gmail.com wrote:
What UFS-like filesystem has unlimited inodes, but is a drop-in
replacement for ext3, and is fairly easy to configure?
Thanks to everyone who replied.
I'm using 100+ rented cloud servers to do stuff for me and rsync the
results back to
Could you use several large hard drives each with several partitions
that each have one filesystem?
With eight drives and eight partitions on each, you would multiply the
maximum total number of inodes by 256.
Mike
--
Michael David Crawford
m...@prgmr.com
prgmr.com - We Don't Assume You
Michael David Crawford a écrit :
Could you use several large hard drives each with several partitions
that each have one filesystem?
With eight drives and eight partitions on each, you would multiply the
maximum total number of inodes by 256.
Mike
Hello
It seems ZFS would match his
Frank Bonnet wrote:
It seems ZFS would match his needs , why don't use it ?
Does ZFS really work on FreeBSD? It seems like every day someone is
posting about ZFS either getting corrupted or panicking their kernel.
Mike
--
Michael David Crawford
m...@prgmr.com
prgmr.com - We Don't
What UFS-like filesystem has unlimited inodes, but is a drop-in
replacement for ext3, and is fairly easy to configure?
Is UFS2 no longer considered the best general-use filesystem?
at least for be it's the best. High performance, minimal hardware resource
usage, perfect recovery from
At this point you're sort of out of the general-use category :) You want
ZFS. Or rather, you don't want to try and fsck a UFS filesystem with 200M
inodes. The three drawbacks I can think of to ZFS are it's hard to boot
ZFS is very trendy now, but isn't it allocating space in 4KB chunks?
Dan Nelson wrote:
In the last episode (Jun 08), Kelly Jones said:
What UFS-like filesystem has unlimited inodes, but is a drop-in
replacement for ext3, and is fairly easy to configure?
Is UFS2 no longer considered the best general-use filesystem?
Reason I ask: I'm going to create many small
Or store your data in a RDBMS rather than in the filesystem.
sounds like the best solution.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to
On Tuesday 09 June 2009 03:10:46 am Matthew Seaman wrote:
Or store your data in a RDBMS rather than in the filesystem.
Hear, hear. I'm hard pressed to imagine why you'd need 100M 1KB files.
--
Kirk Strauser
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing
What UFS-like filesystem has unlimited inodes, but is a drop-in
replacement for ext3, and is fairly easy to configure?
Is UFS2 no longer considered the best general-use filesystem?
Reason I ask: I'm going to create many small (~1K) files on a 100G
disk and thus need at least 100M inodes.
newfs
In the last episode (Jun 08), Kelly Jones said:
What UFS-like filesystem has unlimited inodes, but is a drop-in
replacement for ext3, and is fairly easy to configure?
Is UFS2 no longer considered the best general-use filesystem?
Reason I ask: I'm going to create many small (~1K) files on a
16 matches
Mail list logo
