So this statement in the WikiP is false?
systemd is Linux-only by design, as it relies upon features such as
cgroups and fanotify.[6] Debian is avoiding the adoption of systemd due
to this issue.[7]
--
Randal L. Schwartz - Stonehenge Consulting Services, Inc.
I read an
David Jackson said:
In reference to the claims that systemd developers do not care about
portability, this is deceptive and misleading.
You should read the following interview of Lennart Poettering
http://linuxfr.org/nodes/86687/comments/1249943
The amount of hubris and self confidence he
[ Michel Talon wrote on Wed 22.Aug'12 at 12:29:56 +0200 ]
David Jackson said:
In reference to the claims that systemd developers do not care about
portability, this is deceptive and misleading.
You should read the following interview of Lennart Poettering
On 08/21/2012 09:04 PM, David Jackson wrote:
In reference to the claims that systemd developers do not care about
portability, this is deceptive and misleading. It implies that he is
building in a dependance on intractable hardware platform dependance when
this is absolutely not the case,
On Wed, 22 Aug 2012 12:29:56 +0200
Michel Talon articulated:
David Jackson said:
In reference to the claims that systemd developers do not care
about portability, this is deceptive and misleading.
You should read the following interview of Lennart Poettering
Le 22/08/2012 13:59, Jerry a écrit :
On Wed, 22 Aug 2012 12:29:56 +0200
Michel Talon articulated:
David Jackson said:
In reference to the claims that systemd developers do not care
about portability, this is deceptive and misleading.
You should read the following interview of Lennart
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 7:03 AM, Jamie Paul Griffin ja...@kode5.net wrote:
[ Michel Talon wrote on Wed 22.Aug'12 at 12:29:56 +0200 ]
David Jackson said:
In reference to the claims that systemd developers do not care about
portability, this is deceptive and misleading.
You should
On Wed, 22 Aug 2012 09:41:05 -0400, David Jackson wrote:
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 7:03 AM, Jamie Paul Griffin ja...@kode5.net wrote:
[ Michel Talon wrote on Wed 22.Aug'12 at 12:29:56 +0200 ]
David Jackson said:
In reference to the claims that systemd developers do not care about
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/2011-July/231832.html
Already read and discussed/flamed here.
--
Markiyan.
On 22.08.2012 13:29, Michel Talon wrote:
David Jackson said:
In reference to the claims that systemd developers do not care about
portability, this is deceptive
On Wednesday 22 August 2012 15:41:05 David Jackson wrote:
So this is clearly not about portability, FreeBSD is free to implement
these software interfaces to assure that software is portable to FreeBSD.
Really? You make software portable by writing it to one environment and then
changing every
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 3:41 PM, David Jackson djackson...@gmail.com wrote:
That sort of shows my point in fact. There is nothing stopping FreeBSD from
implementing cgroups, udev, fanotify, timerfd, signalfd, its not like
Linux is going to enforce patents on these things, its software, and
Hi,
I think it would be useful to get familiar with what systemd is,
technically and fundamentally.
Here is a thread in which a knowledgeable professional
questions many technical aspects of it:
open this thread in one browser window (to get a nice overview of what
you already read):
David == David Jackson djackson...@gmail.com writes:
David The fact is, FreeBSD can fully support systemd and all kernel and system
David features, there is nothing here that is impossible for FreeBSD to
David support.
So this statement in the WikiP is false?
systemd is Linux-only by
On 08/20/12 16:42, Mark Felder wrote:
Those in on the core teams here are very well aware. Did you notice
we've survived this long without ALSA? :-) However, this is very good
reading for anyone who hasn't looked at Linux lately, and it's worth
mentioning that this is snowballing quickly. I used
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 09:42:32AM -0500, Mark Felder wrote:
Those in on the core teams here are very well aware. Did you notice
we've survived this long without ALSA? :-) However, this is very
good reading for anyone who hasn't looked at Linux lately, and it's
worth mentioning that this is
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 10:09 AM, jb jb.1234a...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
here is an interesting comment (basically echoing other people's view) on
Linux developments:
http://distrowatch.com/weekly.php?issue=20120820
Reader Comments
1 o Arch and systemd (by Microlinux on 2012-08-20 10:11:39
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 9:20 PM, David Jackson djackson...@gmail.comwrote:
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 10:09 AM, jb jb.1234a...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
here is an interesting comment (basically echoing other people's view) on
Linux developments:
http://distrowatch.com/weekly.php?issue=20120820
Hi,
here is an interesting comment (basically echoing other people's view) on
Linux developments:
http://distrowatch.com/weekly.php?issue=20120820
Reader Comments
1 o Arch and systemd (by Microlinux on 2012-08-20 10:11:39 GMT from France)
Much has been said on the subject of Systemd. Let me quote
Those in on the core teams here are very well aware. Did you notice we've
survived this long without ALSA? :-) However, this is very good reading
for anyone who hasn't looked at Linux lately, and it's worth mentioning
that this is snowballing quickly. I used to really like some Linux
On Mon, 20 Aug 2012 14:09:12 + (UTC)
jb articulated:
here is an interesting comment (basically echoing other people's
view) on Linux developments:
http://distrowatch.com/weekly.php?issue=20120820
Reader Comments
1 o Arch and systemd (by Microlinux on 2012-08-20 10:11:39 GMT from
France)
Jerry jerry at seibercom.net writes:
However, the influence of their employer
is so big that these products are forced upon the wider UNIX
community and at some point it will be assimilate or die.
...
Personally, I embrace progress. Even if there are ten failures in a
row, that one
Mark Felder wrote:
Those in on the core teams here are very well aware. Did you notice we've
survived this long without ALSA? :-) However, this is very good reading
for anyone who hasn't looked at Linux lately, and it's worth mentioning
that this is snowballing quickly. I used to really like
== jb wrote on Mon 20.Aug'12 at 17:40:40 + ==
The end effect is, they consciously want to screw up Linux and non-Linux
(UNIX,
*BSD, etc) ecosystems that opt not to follow them (read some additional
comments that appeared in the meantime in the comments section of
Distrowatch).
This is
On Mon, 20 Aug 2012 17:40:40 + (UTC)
jb articulated:
This is a bad thing for all UNIX or UNIX-like ecosystems, performed
under the noble flag of progress to neutralize and fight opposition.
Do you have any idea how idiotic that statement sounds? What are you
planning on doing? Are you
nice ad hominem screed
On 08/20/2012 12:57, Jerry wrote:
On Mon, 20 Aug 2012 17:40:40 + (UTC)
jb articulated:
This is a bad thing for all UNIX or UNIX-like ecosystems, performed
under the noble flag of progress to neutralize and fight opposition.
Do you have any idea how idiotic that
On Mon, 20 Aug 2012 14:57:14 -0500, je...@seibercom.net wrote:
Support for FLASH basically sucks.
Please stop trolling. I've been using flash with zero issues for 3 years.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
26 matches
Mail list logo
