On Jun 29, 2011, at 9:28 AM, John Walsh wrote:
Families/individuals should manage their own personal identities
through their own domain name, but instead most people have Google
and Facebook manage their personal identities - nobody would do this
in the real world.
exactly john,
Hi,
For those who interested, I will present (in russian language) a talk on 2nd
July at LVEE,
Belarus (Linux Vacations Eastern Europe - www.lvee.org) about custom designed
plug-computer
and FreedomBox initiative.
Let me know if anybody interested in having english tranlated version of
On Wed, 2011-06-29 at 14:41 +0300, Ivan Kuten wrote:
Let me know if anybody interested in having english tranlated version of
presentation and talk.
I think it would be great to have the presentation in Russian, and the
translation in English is a plus :)
Good luck with your speech
/stef
On Wed, 2011-06-29 at 08:37 -0700, Stefano Maffulli wrote:
On Wed, 2011-06-29 at 16:45 +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
Here is an article on upcoming social networking enhancements to Google,
called Google+. Inspirational for conceptual (and, if web-based,
interface) design, and scary in
On 06/29/2011 01:35 PM, Ted Smith wrote:
Any time two programs running on FreedomBoxes are talking to each other,
there's very little reason not to use Tor. It only makes sense not to
use Tor if there's no way to anonymize the protocol, in cases like
BitTorrent, or if there's way too much
There are a few options in how we sort contacts into groups.
We can do it like Facebook. Everybody friends your profile and you
manually group them. The grouping is private in that your friends don't
know what groups they're in (and most of the time, even if they've been
grouped at all).
We
Here is an article on upcoming social networking enhancements
to Google, called Google+. Inspirational for conceptual (and,
if web-based,
interface) design, and scary in other aspects.
http://arstechnica.com/web/news/2011/06/inside-google-how-the-
search-giant-plans-to-go-social.ars
