On 07/09/2011 07:25 PM, Boaz wrote:
[dkg wrote:]
If the repressed source is known only publicly as fubar127, the
non-repressed activist can use OpenPGP certifications to assert that
fubar127 does in fact hold key X.
Here I must disagree. The anonymous blogger named fubar127 does not
need
On 11 July 2011 05:16, Daniel Kahn Gillmor d...@fifthhorseman.net wrote:
[...]
I actually agree that best-effort approaches can be a reasonable part of
a good crypto toolkit, but the willingness to accept a downgrade needs
to reside in the toolkit policy, and the policy needs to be both
On Jul 10, 2011, at 11:09 PM, ya knygar wrote:
What about timezones ?
persistence, the best of concurrent editing shows up
when there are people online on one theme, just amazing,
and when people offline - it could look like a wiki
i absolutly agree with you live is allways much better,
On Jul 11, 2011, at 3:31 AM, nathan nolast wrote:
i love these types of discussions, the freedombox creating its own
darknet if you will. Instead of having things like an exit enclave,
we could have entrance enclaves where users that are not in a
location that they can tap into the
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 4:56 PM, Sandy Harris sandyinch...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 2:25 AM, Marc Manthey m...@let.de wrote:
I have one little concern , here in germany (maybe somewhere else ? ) we
have a law called Störerhaftung
