Greetings,
I am sending this email in order to show my interest in your GSoC program
for this summer.
To begin with, I would like to learn some general information about your
project in order to judge if I am capable of participating in it. I am
currently studying Compilers and Programming
On Sat, Mar 12, 2022 at 10:40 AM Γιωργος Μελλιος via Gcc
wrote:
>
> Greetings,
>
> I am sending this email in order to show my interest in your GSoC program
> for this summer.
> To begin with, I would like to learn some general information about your
> project in order to judge if I am capable of
Snapshot gcc-11-20220312 is now available on
https://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/11-20220312/
and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details.
This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 11 git branch
with the following options: git://gcc.gnu.org/git/gcc.git branch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104475
Aldy Hernandez changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||law at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #8
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98420
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Roger Sayle :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:72c243017dee611bf3c32ea7bfad6ac538021aaf
commit r12-7621-g72c243017dee611bf3c32ea7bfad6ac538021aaf
Author: Roger Sayle
Date: Sat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65095
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Thomas Schwinge :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:828335beb77676acffb5911e575672cb55beb2e9
commit r12-7622-g828335beb77676acffb5911e575672cb55beb2e9
Author: Thomas Schwinge
Date:
Hi!
On 2022-02-17T13:33:45+0100, I wrote:
> On 2019-10-18T14:28:18+0200, I wrote:
>> On 2019-10-06T15:32:34-0700, Julian Brown wrote:
>>> This patch adds a function to pretty-print OpenACC clause names from
>>> OMP_CLAUSE_MAP_KINDs, for error output.
>>
>> Indeed talking about (OpenMP) 'map'
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97198
--- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely ---
I'll add a note to the lwg issue, as I'll never remember there was a comment
about it here.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104890
--- Comment #1 from Matthias Klose ---
that is only seen when configuring with --enable-default-pie
Priority: P3
Component: target
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: doko at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
trunk 20220312 fails to build the 32bit libgcc on x86_64-linux-gnu:
/home/packages/gcc/12/gcc-12-12-20220312/build/./gcc/xgcc
-B
On Fri, 2022-03-11 at 21:26 +, Qing Zhao wrote:
> Hi, Ruoyao,
>
> (I might not be able to reply to this thread till next Wed due to a
> short vacation).
>
> First, some comments on opening bugs against Gcc:
>
> I took a look at the bug reports PR104817 and PR104820:
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104853
--- Comment #5 from rvalue ---
(In reply to Kito Cheng from comment #4)
> Thanks your info, that cause by the default ISA spec version bump issue,
> binutils 2.38 and GCC 11.* using different default ISA spec cause this
> issue, I've push a
My sincere apologies for the breakage, but alas handling SImode in the
recently added "xorl;movb -> movzbl" peephole2 turns out to be slightly
more complicated that just using SWI48 as a mode iterator. I'd failed
to check the machine description carefully, but the *zero_extendsi2
define_insn is
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70536
--- Comment #3 from Ed Catmur ---
Updated: https://github.com/gcc-mirror/gcc/compare/master...ecatmur:pr-70536
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104895
--- Comment #1 from Christoph Müllner ---
Compiling with '-v' shows the following differences:
BAD:
gcc -v -fPIC -flto=auto -shared -Wl,-soname,"lib'do it'.so" -o "lib'do it'.so"
doit.o
[...]
COLLECT_GCC_OPTIONS='-v' '-fPIC' '-flto=auto'
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104086
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Thomas Schwinge :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:337ed336d7dd83526891bdb436f0bfe9e351f69d
commit r12-7624-g337ed336d7dd83526891bdb436f0bfe9e351f69d
Author: Thomas Schwinge
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100280
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Thomas Schwinge :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:337ed336d7dd83526891bdb436f0bfe9e351f69d
commit r12-7624-g337ed336d7dd83526891bdb436f0bfe9e351f69d
Author: Thomas Schwinge
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104086
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104552
--- Comment #37 from Roland Illig ---
I'm splitting this bug report into multiple bug reports, to clean up the mess
that the 36 comments created. It was a bad idea from the beginning. :)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104086
--- Comment #1 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Thomas Schwinge :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9781ae3a254a8c17ef4ffa70f21ed1728ff3c707
commit r12-7623-g9781ae3a254a8c17ef4ffa70f21ed1728ff3c707
Author: Thomas Schwinge
Hi!
On 2022-03-12T13:38:38+0100, I wrote:
> On 2020-11-13T23:22:30+0100, I wrote:
>> On 2019-02-01T00:59:30+0100, I wrote:
>>> I've just pushed the attached nine patches to openacc-gcc-8-branch:
>>> OpenACC 'kernels' construct changes: splitting of the construct into
>>> several regions.
>>
>>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104891
Bug ID: 104891
Summary: Possibly wrong location definition in DWARF with
-fschedule-insns2 at -O2/-O3
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104892
Bug ID: 104892
Summary: OpenACC 'kernels' decomposition: wrong-code cases
unless manually making certain variables addressable
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status:
Hi!
On 2021-05-21T21:29:19+0200, I wrote:
> I've pushed "[OpenACC privatization] Largely extend diagnostics and
> corresponding testsuite coverage [PR90115]" to master branch in commit
> 11b8286a83289f5b54e813f14ff56d730c3f3185
To demonstrate that later changes don't vs. how they do change
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90115
--- Comment #16 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Thomas Schwinge :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2e53fa7bb2ae9fe1152c27e423be9e261da82ddc
commit r12-7625-g2e53fa7bb2ae9fe1152c27e423be9e261da82ddc
Author: Thomas Schwinge
timization level -O2 or higher
- If I replace "-mcpu=power10" by "-mcpu=power9", the compilation works fine
- The same error does not happen on gcc10
gcc version:
- gcc (GCC) 11.2.1 20220312 [remotes/origin/releases/gcc-11 revision
6f581f90e3:53ab7b79c6:908e612067e42ded881db10d38768
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100280
--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Thomas Schwinge :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a07b8f4fb756484893b5612cbe9410970dc76db9
commit r12-7627-ga07b8f4fb756484893b5612cbe9410970dc76db9
Author: Thomas Schwinge
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104892
--- Comment #1 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Thomas Schwinge :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:535afbd959bc72de85fca36ba6417f075cca1018
commit r12-7626-g535afbd959bc72de85fca36ba6417f075cca1018
Author: Thomas Schwinge
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104892
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Thomas Schwinge :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a07b8f4fb756484893b5612cbe9410970dc76db9
commit r12-7627-ga07b8f4fb756484893b5612cbe9410970dc76db9
Author: Thomas Schwinge
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104892
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104794
--- Comment #11 from Roland Illig ---
Thank you, looks good now.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104890
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2022-03-12
Ever confirmed|0
Hi!
On 2020-11-13T23:22:30+0100, I wrote:
> On 2019-02-01T00:59:30+0100, I wrote:
>> I've just pushed the attached nine patches to openacc-gcc-8-branch:
>> OpenACC 'kernels' construct changes: splitting of the construct into
>> several regions.
>
> Now, slightly more polished, I've pushed to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104893
Bug ID: 104893
Summary: [nvptx] Handle Independent Thread Scheduling for
sm_70+ with -msoft-stack
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
Hi!
On 2022-03-01T17:46:20+0100, I wrote:
> On 2022-01-13T10:54:16+0100, I wrote:
>> On 2019-05-08T14:51:57+0100, Julian Brown wrote:
>>> - The "addressable" bit is set during the kernels conversion pass for
>>>variables that have "create" (alloc) clauses created for them in the
>>>
Hi!
On 2022-03-12T15:54:31+0100, I wrote:
> On 2022-03-01T17:46:20+0100, I wrote:
>> On 2022-01-13T10:54:16+0100, I wrote:
>>> On 2019-05-08T14:51:57+0100, Julian Brown wrote:
- The "addressable" bit is set during the kernels conversion pass for
variables that have "create" (alloc)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104895
Bug ID: 104895
Summary: lto1: issue with space in library filename
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: lto
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51446
Roger Sayle changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||joshua.england@worldprogram
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78249
Roger Sayle changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||roger at nextmovesoftware dot
com
On Fri, Mar 11, 2022 at 05:51:05PM -0500, Michael Meissner wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 11, 2022 at 02:51:23PM -0600, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 11, 2022 at 08:42:27PM +, Joseph Myers wrote:
> > > The version of this patch applied to GCC 10 branch (commit
> > >
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104829
--- Comment #16 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Segher Boessenkool :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:80fcc4b6afee72443bef551064826b3b4b6785e6
commit r12-7628-g80fcc4b6afee72443bef551064826b3b4b6785e6
Author: Segher
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104829
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104552
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|amacleod at redhat dot com |
--- Comment #39 from Eric
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104890
--- Comment #3 from Matthias Klose ---
Created attachment 52616
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=52616=edit
preprocessed source
/home/packages/gcc/12/gcc-12-12-20220313/build/./gcc/cc1 -E -quiet -v -I . -I .
-I
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104890
Matthias Klose changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104890
--- Comment #4 from Matthias Klose ---
about the configure options, apparently pie is not the culprit, configuring
with --enable-cet is. note that I didn't use --disable-bootstrap.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103324
--- Comment #4 from Eric Gallager ---
Another thing that would be useful would be to have (more) comments in the
source code saying stuff like "/* this codepath is tested by
*/" or something... although I guess it could be a problem keeping
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104900
Bug ID: 104900
Summary: segfault with parameterized derived type with kind
parameter and allocatable component
Product: gcc
Version: 11.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
On Sat, 2022-03-12 at 18:48 +0800, Xi Ruoyao via Gcc-patches wrote:
> On Fri, 2022-03-11 at 21:26 +, Qing Zhao wrote:
> > Hi, Ruoyao,
> >
> > (I might not be able to reply to this thread till next Wed due to a
> > short vacation).
> >
> > First, some comments on opening bugs against Gcc:
> >
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104898
Bug ID: 104898
Summary: missing %q in diagnostic
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: diagnostic
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104899
Bug ID: 104899
Summary: typo "cannott"
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: diagnostic
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
On Fri, 11 Mar 2022, Roger Sayle wrote:
+(match vec_same_elem_p
+ CONSTRUCTOR@0
+ (if (uniform_vector_p (TREE_CODE (@0) == SSA_NAME
+? gimple_assign_rhs1 (SSA_NAME_DEF_STMT (@0)) : @0
Ah, I didn't remember we needed that, we don't seem to be very consistent
about
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98767
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |12.0
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104853
--- Comment #6 from rvalue ---
I've got some verbose output from gcc, and it seems that a duplicate `-march`
is passed to `as`
$ gcc -c test.c -march=rv64g --verbose
Using built-in specs.
COLLECT_GCC=/usr/sbin/gcc
Target:
My recent testcase for PR c++/84964.C stress tests the middle-end by
attempting to pass a UINT_MAX sized structure on the stack. Although
my fix to PR84964 avoids the ICE after sorry() on x86_64 and similar
targets, a related issue still exists on powerpc64 (and similar
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104885
Roger Sayle changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104853
--- Comment #7 from rvalue ---
Well, I've found something that could be problematic here:
https://gcc.gnu.org/git/?p=gcc.git;a=blob;f=gcc/config/riscv/arch-canonicalize;h=49a6204b9cb64cb0e375c6003c423bf115a0a8a6;hb=HEAD#l60
It's never updated
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104527
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9413bb55185b9e88d84e91d5145d59f9f83b884a
commit r12-7631-g9413bb55185b9e88d84e91d5145d59f9f83b884a
Author: Patrick Palka
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98644
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ab71d3fe4b23af4c29a8d6fcf1e914fed4393e3b
commit r12-7630-gab71d3fe4b23af4c29a8d6fcf1e914fed4393e3b
Author: Patrick Palka
Date:
Hello, gentle maintainer.
This is a message from the Translation Project robot.
A revised PO file for textual domain 'gcc' has been submitted
by the French team of translators. The file is available at:
https://translationproject.org/latest/gcc/fr.po
(This file,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104641
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d3b0dc686c00bfe9e7f4fe0490def68e9b92157a
commit r12-7633-gd3b0dc686c00bfe9e7f4fe0490def68e9b92157a
Author: Patrick Palka
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104622
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:03c83cf7aa1110e427beb00ea95767dfaf50d694
commit r12-7632-g03c83cf7aa1110e427beb00ea95767dfaf50d694
Author: Patrick Palka
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104527
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[11/12 Regression] ICE: |[11 Regression] ICE: tree
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98644
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[10/11/12 Regression] |[10/11 Regression]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104641
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |12.0
Status|ASSIGNED
I have *NOT* pushed this yet, looking for feedback:
It appears redhat.com has lost Fedora mailing list archives, which are
now at lists.fedoraproject.org using completely different tooling.
Jakub, is there a better way than the patch below?
Gerald
diff --git a/htdocs/gcc-4.3/porting_to.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104897
Bug ID: 104897
Summary: wrong plural form in diagnostic
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: diagnostic
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Hi!
We ICE on the following testcase, because we tentatively parse it multiple
times and the erroneous attribute syntax results in
cp_parser_skip_to_end_of_statement, which when seeing CPP_PRAGMA (can be
any deferred one, OpenMP/OpenACC/ivdep etc.) it calls
cp_parser_skip_to_pragma_eol, which
Hi!
These intrinsics are supposed to do an unaligned may_alias load
of a 16-bit or 32-bit value and store it as the first element of
a 128-bit integer vector, with all other elements cleared.
The current _mm_storeu_* implementation implements that correctly, uses
__*_u types to do the store and
Hi!
The following testcase ICEs on powerpc-linux, because lra_substitute_pseudo
substitutes (const_int 1) into a subreg operand. First a subreg of subreg
of a reg appears in a debug insn (which surely is invalid outside of
debug insns, but in debug insns we allow even what is normally invalid in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104622
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104895
--- Comment #2 from Christoph Müllner ---
Further analysis shows that '-flto=1' works as well and '-flto=16' fails as
well.
This brings us right to the spot:
Bad:
[...]
make -f /tmp/ccyzs8VX.mk -j16 all
Using built-in specs.
[...]
Good:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104896
Bug ID: 104896
Summary: Messages use %<%s%> instead of the idiomatic %qs
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: diagnostic
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104552
--- Comment #38 from Roland Illig ---
(In reply to Roland Illig from comment #7)
> From params.opt:
> > --param=ranger-debug=[none|trace|gori|cache|tracegori|all]
> > Specifies the output mode for debugging ranger.
>
> Why " " instead of the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96787
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|10.2|11.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104894
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||powerpc64le-linux-gnu
See
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104895
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
White spaces and even special characters will always be a problem with anything
that interacts with make or the shell.
I am not saying this is not a fixable issue, just fixing this might even
require huge
Hello, gentle maintainer.
This is a message from the Translation Project robot.
A revised PO file for textual domain 'gcc' has been submitted
by the Swedish team of translators. The file is available at:
https://translationproject.org/latest/gcc/sv.po
(This file,
78 matches
Mail list logo