gcc-wwwdocs branch master updated. 65972a4db45912ed8738bf4c367b4e8e173b2587

2024-04-26 Thread Jakub Jelinek via Gcc-cvs-wwwdocs
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing the project "gcc-wwwdocs". The branch, master has been updated via 65972a4db45912ed8738bf4c367b4e8e173b2587 (commit) from

GCC 15.0.0 Status Report (2024-04-26)

2024-04-26 Thread Jakub Jelinek via Gcc
Status == The trunk has branched for the GCC 14 release and is now open again for general development, stage 1. Please consider not disrupting it too much during the RC phase of GCC 14 so it is possible to test important fixes for 14.1 on it. Quality Data Priority #

[committed, gcc-14] libstdc++: Update status tables to refer to GCC 14 not mainline

2024-04-26 Thread Jonathan Wakely
Pushed to gcc-14. -- >8 -- libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog: * doc/html/manual/status.html: Regenerate. * doc/xml/manual/status_cxx1998.xml: Replace references to mainline GCC. * doc/xml/manual/status_cxx2011.xml: Likewise. * doc/xml/manual/status_cxx2014.xml:

[gcc r14-10139] libstdc++: Update status tables to refer to GCC 14 not mainline

2024-04-26 Thread Jonathan Wakely via Libstdc++-cvs
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5e5f33a067d03d11f67eba719d3ef9f37b23886d commit r14-10139-g5e5f33a067d03d11f67eba719d3ef9f37b23886d Author: Jonathan Wakely Date: Fri Apr 26 11:46:01 2024 +0100 libstdc++: Update status tables to refer to GCC 14 not mainline libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog:

[committed, gcc-13] libstdc++: Update status tables to refer to GCC 13 not mainline

2024-04-26 Thread Jonathan Wakely
Pushed to gcc-13. -- >8 -- This should have been done before the 13.1.0 release. libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog: * doc/html/manual/status.html: Regenerate. * doc/xml/manual/status_cxx1998.xml: Replace references to mainline GCC. * doc/xml/manual/status_cxx2011.xml:

[gcc r13-8653] libstdc++: Update status tables to refer to GCC 13 not mainline

2024-04-26 Thread Jonathan Wakely via Gcc-cvs
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:56f28dd436c75b5cfbd6af7a02bff968894eafa6 commit r13-8653-g56f28dd436c75b5cfbd6af7a02bff968894eafa6 Author: Jonathan Wakely Date: Fri Apr 26 11:46:01 2024 +0100 libstdc++: Update status tables to refer to GCC 13 not mainline This should have been done before

[committed] libstdc++: Adjust whitespace in status tables in manual

2024-04-26 Thread Jonathan Wakely
Pushed to trunk. I'll also be following this with the non-whitespace equivalents for the gcc-14 and gcc-13 branches. -- >8 -- This simplifies the changes needed after branching for a new release, so that new line breaks don't need to be introduced every time we branch. libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog:

[gcc r15-3] libstdc++: Adjust whitespace in status tables in manual

2024-04-26 Thread Jonathan Wakely via Gcc-cvs
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:772250a36c53a7b29a53e090d911b502afdfd1fe commit r15-3-g772250a36c53a7b29a53e090d911b502afdfd1fe Author: Jonathan Wakely Date: Fri Apr 26 11:48:48 2024 +0100 libstdc++: Adjust whitespace in status tables in manual This simplifies the changes needed after

GCC 14.0.1 Status Report (2023-04-26)

2024-04-26 Thread Jakub Jelinek via Gcc
Status ==

Re: [PATCH] Fix rust on *-w64-mingw32

2024-04-26 Thread Arthur Cohen
Hello, Thanks a lot for the patch :) I agree with Jakub that we should be using the GNU coding style in our call to std::replace - this is what we try to enforce in the rest of the Rust frontend. Regarding the changes to `mkdir_wrapped`, the function now looks a bit odd: void mkdir_wrapped

gcc-wwwdocs branch master updated. 310806bc84783e8394bd6618ce19eb2e0bfae1be

2024-04-26 Thread Andrew Stubbs via Gcc-cvs-wwwdocs
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing the project "gcc-wwwdocs". The branch, master has been updated via 310806bc84783e8394bd6618ce19eb2e0bfae1be (commit) from

Results for 14.0.1 20240426 (experimental) [remotes/origin/HEAD r14-10137-g4a2e55b3ad] (GCC) testsuite on powerpc64le-unknown-linux-gnu

2024-04-26 Thread Bill Seurer (POWER9 IEEE128) via Gcc-testresults
t/powerpc/ppc-fortran/ieee128-math.f90 -O (test for excess errors) === gcc Summary === # of expected passes179467 # of unexpected failures97 # of unexpected successes 20 # of expected failures 1612 # of unsupported tests 4251 /home/g

[wwwdocs] gcc-14/changes.html (AMD GCN): Mention gfx90c support

2024-04-26 Thread Andrew Stubbs
I will push this shortly. I think the gfx90c patch just made the cut for the GCC-14 branch! Andrew --- htdocs/gcc-14/changes.html | 8 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/htdocs/gcc-14/changes.html b/htdocs/gcc-14/changes.html index fce0fb44..47fef32d 100644

[wwwdocs] gcc-14/changes.html (AMD GCN): Mention gfx90c support

2024-04-26 Thread Andrew Stubbs
I will push this shortly. I think the gfx90c patch just made the cut for the GCC-14 branch! Andrew --- htdocs/gcc-14/changes.html | 8 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/htdocs/gcc-14/changes.html b/htdocs/gcc-14/changes.html index fce0fb44..47fef32d 100644

Results for 14.0.1 20240426 (experimental) [remotes/origin/HEAD r14-10137-g4a2e55b3ada] (GCC) testsuite on powerpc64le-unknown-linux-gnu

2024-04-26 Thread Bill Seurer (POWER9) via Gcc-testresults
of unsupported tests 4249 /home/gccbuild/build/nightly/build-gcc-trunk/gcc/xgcc version 14.0.1 20240426 (experimental) [remotes/origin/HEAD r14-10137-g4a2e55b3ada] (GCC) === gfortran tests === Running target unix XPASS: gfortran.dg/large_real_kind_form_io_2.f90

Results for 13.2.1 20240426 [releases/gcc-13 r13-8652-g7425436b53] (GCC) testsuite on powerpc64-unknown-linux-gnu

2024-04-26 Thread Bill Seurer (POWER9 BE) via Gcc-testresults
/nightly/build-gcc-13/gcc/xg++ version 13.2.1 20240426 [releases/gcc-13 r13-8652-g7425436b53] (GCC) === gcc tests === Running target unix/-m32 XPASS: gcc.dg/guality/example.c -O0 execution test XPASS: gcc.dg/guality/example.c -O1 -DPREVENT_OPTIMIZATION execution test XPASS

Results for 13.2.1 20240426 [releases/gcc-13 r13-8651-ge207b67fcd] (GCC) testsuite on powerpc64le-unknown-linux-gnu

2024-04-26 Thread Bill Seurer (POWER8) via Gcc-testresults
f expected failures 1550 # of unsupported tests 3992 /home/gccbuild/build/nightly/build-gcc-13/gcc/xgcc version 13.2.1 20240426 [releases/gcc-13 r13-8651-ge207b67fcd] (GCC) === gfortran tests === Running target unix XPASS: gfortran.dg/large_real_kind_form_io_2

Regressions on native/releases/gcc-13 at commit r13-8651 vs commit r13-8649 on Linux/x86_64

2024-04-26 Thread Haochen Jiang via Gcc-regression
Regressions on releases/gcc-13 at commit r13-8651 vs commit r13-8649 on Linux/x86_64 New failures: New passes: FAIL: libgomp.c/../libgomp.c-c++-common/for-6.c execution test

[gcc r15-2] ada: bump Library_Version to 15.

2024-04-26 Thread Jakub Jelinek via Gcc-cvs
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8a9a4648ec1040e34b88fb3e2c60784daa78ef85 commit r15-2-g8a9a4648ec1040e34b88fb3e2c60784daa78ef85 Author: Jakub Jelinek Date: Fri Apr 26 12:20:45 2024 +0200 ada: bump Library_Version to 15. gcc/ada/ChangeLog: * gnatvsn.ads: Bump

[Bug libstdc++/114863] std::format applying grouping to nan's and inf's

2024-04-26 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114863 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely --- Maybe we could also make _M_localize more efficient for finite values by not even attempting to use grouping for scientific format.

[gcc r15-1] Update crontab and git_update_version.py

2024-04-26 Thread Jakub Jelinek via Gcc-cvs
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:036aad9dfca74d022180c656177762b27f47ccf6 commit r15-1-g036aad9dfca74d022180c656177762b27f47ccf6 Author: Jakub Jelinek Date: Fri Apr 26 12:18:29 2024 +0200 Update crontab and git_update_version.py 2024-04-26 Jakub Jelinek maintainer-scripts/

Results for 14.0.1 20240426 (experimental) [master revision gcc-14-10136-g9353f6f475b] (GCC) testsuite on arm-unknown-eabi

2024-04-26 Thread ci_notify--- via Gcc-testresults
ted passes162136 # of unexpected failures56 # of expected failures 1020 # of unresolved testcases 24 # of unsupported tests 9239 /home/tcwg-buildslave/workspace/tcwg_gnu_1/abe/builds/destdir/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/bin/arm-eabi-gcc version 14.0.1 20240426 (experime

Re: [PATCH] wwwdocs: Add note to changes.html for __has_{feature,extension}

2024-04-26 Thread Alex Coplan
On 17/04/2024 11:41, Marek Polacek wrote: > On Mon, Apr 15, 2024 at 11:13:27AM +0100, Alex Coplan wrote: > > On 04/04/2024 11:00, Alex Coplan wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > This adds a note to the GCC 14 release notes mentioning support for > > > __has_{feature,extension} (PR60512). > > > > > > OK

gcc-wwwdocs branch master updated. b95970493949b66026d8947ef01e2a4c9c56a52a

2024-04-26 Thread Jakub Jelinek via Gcc-cvs-wwwdocs
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing the project "gcc-wwwdocs". The branch, master has been updated via b95970493949b66026d8947ef01e2a4c9c56a52a (commit) from

[Bug libstdc++/114863] std::format applying grouping to nan's and inf's

2024-04-26 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114863 --- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely --- --- a/libstdc++-v3/include/std/format +++ b/libstdc++-v3/include/std/format @@ -1734,7 +1734,7 @@ namespace __format } #endif - if (_M_spec._M_localized) + if

[Bug fortran/61527] [11/12/13/14 Regression] [OOP] class/extends, multiple generic assignment, accept invalid

2024-04-26 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61527 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[gcc] Created tag 'basepoints/gcc-15'

2024-04-26 Thread Jakub Jelinek via Gcc-cvs
The signed tag 'basepoints/gcc-15' was created pointing to: 48a320a1757... Bump BASE-VER. Tagger: Jakub Jelinek Date: Fri Apr 26 11:53:56 2024 +0200 GCC 15 basepoint

[Bug fortran/84868] [11/12/13/14 Regression] ICE in gfc_conv_descriptor_offset, at fortran/trans-array.c:208

2024-04-26 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84868 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pault at gcc dot gnu.org

[gcc r14-10139] Bump BASE-VER.

2024-04-26 Thread Jakub Jelinek via Gcc-cvs
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:48a320a175780a0714741c71b4299a634807ad4b commit r14-10139-g48a320a175780a0714741c71b4299a634807ad4b Author: Jakub Jelinek Date: Fri Apr 26 11:50:36 2024 +0200 Bump BASE-VER. 2024-04-26 Jakub Jelinek * BASE-VER: Set to 15.0.0. Diff: ---

Re: [PATCH] wwwdocs: contribute.html: Update consensus on patch content.

2024-04-26 Thread Christophe Lyon
On Fri, 26 Apr 2024 at 10:25, Christophe Lyon wrote: > > On Thu, 25 Apr 2024 at 17:44, Carlos O'Donell wrote: > > > > Discussion is here: > > https://inbox.sourceware.org/gcc/CAPS5khZeWkAD=v8ka9g5eecdnk3bdhfnzjumpvc+hedmkvj...@mail.gmail.com/ > > > > Rough consensus from Jakub Jelinek, Richard

[gcc] Created branch 'releases/gcc-14'

2024-04-26 Thread Jakub Jelinek via Gcc-cvs
The branch 'releases/gcc-14' was created pointing to: b8e9fd535d6... amdgcn: Add gfx90c target

1.76% performance loss in VRP due to inlining

2024-04-26 Thread Aldy Hernandez via Gcc
Hi folks! In implementing prange (pointer ranges), I have found a 1.74% slowdown in VRP, even without any code path actually using the code. I have tracked this down to irange::get_bitmask() being compiled differently with and without the bare bones patch. With the patch, irange::get_bitmask()

[Bug target/114861] LoongArch: ICE building the kernel with -Os

2024-04-26 Thread xry111 at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114861 Xi Ruoyao changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|needs-reduction |ice-on-valid-code --- Comment #5 from Xi

[Bug tree-optimization/114864] New: wrong code at -O1 with "-fno-tree-dce -fno-tree-fre" on x86_64-linux-gnu

2024-04-26 Thread zhendong.su at inf dot ethz.ch via Gcc-bugs
ecking=yes --prefix=/local/suz-local/software/local/gcc-trunk --enable-sanitizers --enable-languages=c,c++ --disable-werror --enable-multilib Thread model: posix Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib gcc version 14.0.1 20240426 (experimental) (GCC) [589] % [589] % gcctk -O1 small.c; ./a.out [59

[gcc r14-10138] amdgcn: Add gfx90c target

2024-04-26 Thread Frederik Harwath via Gcc-cvs
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b8e9fd535d6093e3a24af858364d8517a767b0d7 commit r14-10138-gb8e9fd535d6093e3a24af858364d8517a767b0d7 Author: Frederik Harwath Date: Wed Apr 24 20:29:14 2024 +0200 amdgcn: Add gfx90c target Add support for gfx90c GCN5 APU integrated graphics devices. The

gcc-wwwdocs branch master updated. 80602974943a9bba6d3fda66be3adbe488b12708

2024-04-26 Thread Marc Poulhi?s via Gcc-cvs-wwwdocs
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing the project "gcc-wwwdocs". The branch, master has been updated via 80602974943a9bba6d3fda66be3adbe488b12708 (commit) from

Re: [PATCH][GCC] aarch64: Fix SCHEDULER_IDENT for Cortex-A510

2024-04-26 Thread Richard Earnshaw (lists)
On 25/04/2024 15:59, Richard Ball wrote: > Hi Richard, > > I committed this combined patch (with Cortex-A520) for trunk > https://gcc.gnu.org/git/?p=gcc.git;a=commit;h=cab53aae43cf94171b01320c08302e47a5daa391 > >

Re: [PATCH] arm: Zero/Sign extends for CMSE security

2024-04-26 Thread Richard Earnshaw (lists)
On 26/04/2024 09:39, Torbjorn SVENSSON wrote: > Hi, > > On 2024-04-25 16:25, Richard Ball wrote: >> Hi Torbjorn, >> >> Thanks very much for the comments. >> I think given that the code that handles this, is within a >> FOREACH_FUNCTION_ARGS loop. >> It seems a fairly safe assumption that if the

Re: [PATCH] i386: Fix array index overflow in pr105354-2.c

2024-04-26 Thread Uros Bizjak
On Fri, Apr 26, 2024 at 11:03 AM Haochen Jiang wrote: > > Hi all, > > The array index should not be over 8 for v8hi, or it will fail > under -O0 or using -fstack-protector. > > This patch aims to fix that, which is mentioned in PR110621. > > Commit as obvious and backport to GCC13. > > Thx, >

[Bug target/110621] x86_64: Test gcc.target/i386/pr105354-2.c fails with -fstack-protector

2024-04-26 Thread liuhongt at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110621 Hongtao Liu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/110621] x86_64: Test gcc.target/i386/pr105354-2.c fails with -fstack-protector

2024-04-26 Thread haochen.jiang at intel dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110621 Haochen Jiang changed: What|Removed |Added CC||haochen.jiang at intel dot com ---

[gcc r13-8652] i386: Fix array index overflow in pr105354-2.c

2024-04-26 Thread Haochen Jiang via Gcc-cvs
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7425436b5382a04f3eb28c7c7912f4d9a1cad0bd commit r13-8652-g7425436b5382a04f3eb28c7c7912f4d9a1cad0bd Author: Haochen Jiang Date: Fri Apr 26 16:48:29 2024 +0800 i386: Fix array index overflow in pr105354-2.c The array index should not be over 8 for v8hi, or it

[Bug target/110621] x86_64: Test gcc.target/i386/pr105354-2.c fails with -fstack-protector

2024-04-26 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110621 --- Comment #2 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Haochen Jiang : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7425436b5382a04f3eb28c7c7912f4d9a1cad0bd commit r13-8652-g7425436b5382a04f3eb28c7c7912f4d9a1cad0bd Author: Haochen Jiang

[gcc r14-10137] i386: Fix array index overflow in pr105354-2.c

2024-04-26 Thread Haochen Jiang via Gcc-cvs
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4a2e55b3ada20fe6457466bb687a66c8d03e056e commit r14-10137-g4a2e55b3ada20fe6457466bb687a66c8d03e056e Author: Haochen Jiang Date: Fri Apr 26 16:48:29 2024 +0800 i386: Fix array index overflow in pr105354-2.c The array index should not be over 8 for v8hi, or it

[Bug target/110621] x86_64: Test gcc.target/i386/pr105354-2.c fails with -fstack-protector

2024-04-26 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110621 --- Comment #1 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Haochen Jiang : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4a2e55b3ada20fe6457466bb687a66c8d03e056e commit r14-10137-g4a2e55b3ada20fe6457466bb687a66c8d03e056e Author: Haochen Jiang Date:

[PATCH] i386: Fix array index overflow in pr105354-2.c

2024-04-26 Thread Haochen Jiang
Hi all, The array index should not be over 8 for v8hi, or it will fail under -O0 or using -fstack-protector. This patch aims to fix that, which is mentioned in PR110621. Commit as obvious and backport to GCC13. Thx, Haochen gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: PR target/110621 *

Results for 14.0.1 20240426 (experimental) [master revision gcc-14-10136-g9353f6f475b] (GCC) testsuite on arm-unknown-eabi

2024-04-26 Thread ci_notify--- via Gcc-testresults
=== gcc Summary === # of expected passes159050 # of unexpected failures233 # of expected failures 1000 # of unresolved testcases 25 # of unsupported tests 9686 /home/tcwg-buildslave/workspace/tcwg_gnu_0/abe/builds/destdir/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/b

Results for 14.0.1 20240426 (experimental) [master r14-10136-g9353f6f475b929] (GCC) testsuite on aarch64-suse-linux-gnu

2024-04-26 Thread Andreas Schwab via Gcc-testresults
1 /opt/gcc/gcc-20240426/Build/./gcc/gccgo version 14.0.1 20240426 (experimental) [master r14-10136-g9353f6f475b929] (GCC) === libgomp tests === Running target unix/-mabi=lp64 WARNING: libgomp.c/../libgomp.c-c++-common/for-5.c (test for excess errors) program timed out

[Bug libstdc++/114862] std::uppercase not applying to nan's and inf's

2024-04-26 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114862 --- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely --- Actually I think we're doing exactly what the standard requires: ios_base::fmtflags __fltfield = __flags & ios_base::floatfield; ... // [22.2.2.2.2] Table 58 if (__fltfield ==

Re: [PATCH] amdgcn: Add gfx90c target

2024-04-26 Thread Andrew Stubbs
On 25/04/2024 19:37, Frederik Harwath wrote: Hi Andrew, this patch adds support for gfx90c GCN5 APU integrated graphics devices. The LLVM AMDGPU documentation (https://llvm.org/docs/AMDGPUUsage.html) lists those devices as unsupported by rocm-amdhsa. As we have discussed elsewhere, I have tested

[COMMITTED] gcc-14: Add Ada changes

2024-04-26 Thread Marc Poulhiès
Co-authored-by: Fernando Oleo Blanco Co-authored-by: Piotr Trojanek Signed-off-by: Marc Poulhiès --- htdocs/gcc-14/changes.html | 67 +- 1 file changed, 66 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/htdocs/gcc-14/changes.html b/htdocs/gcc-14/changes.html

gcc-wwwdocs branch master updated. 9d0937bd03d26ce473e0f745797fbee2b20f5062

2024-04-26 Thread Marc Poulhi?s via Gcc-cvs-wwwdocs
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing the project "gcc-wwwdocs". The branch, master has been updated via 9d0937bd03d26ce473e0f745797fbee2b20f5062 (commit) from

Results for 13.2.1 20240426 [releases/gcc-13 r13-8651-ge207b67fcd] (GCC) testsuite on powerpc64le-unknown-linux-gnu

2024-04-26 Thread Bill Seurer (POWER9) via Gcc-testresults
htly/build-gcc-13/gcc/xgcc version 13.2.1 20240426 [releases/gcc-13 r13-8651-ge207b67fcd] (GCC) === gfortran tests === Running target unix XPASS: gfortran.dg/large_real_kind_form_io_2.f90 -O0 execution test XPASS: gfortran.dg/large_real_kind_form_io_2.f90 -O1 execution

[Bug libstdc++/114862] std::uppercase not applying to nan's and inf's

2024-04-26 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114862 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|

Results for 13.2.1 20240426 [releases/gcc-13 r13-8651-ge207b67fcd] (GCC) testsuite on powerpc64-unknown-linux-gnu

2024-04-26 Thread Bill Seurer (POWER9 BE) via Gcc-testresults
/nightly/build-gcc-13/gcc/xg++ version 13.2.1 20240426 [releases/gcc-13 r13-8651-ge207b67fcd] (GCC) === gcc tests === Running target unix/-m32 XPASS: gcc.dg/guality/example.c -O0 execution test XPASS: gcc.dg/guality/example.c -O1 -DPREVENT_OPTIMIZATION execution test XPASS

[Bug libstdc++/114863] std::format applying grouping to nan's and inf's

2024-04-26 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114863 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Assignee|unassigned at

[Bug libgomp/113867] [14 Regression][OpenMP] Wrong code with mapping pointers in structs

2024-04-26 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113867 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P1 |P2 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek

[Bug middle-end/113724] [14 Regression][OpenMP] ICE (segfault) when mapping a struct in omp_gather_mapping_groups_1 since r14-6515

2024-04-26 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113724 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P1 |P2 --- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek

Re: [PATCH] arm: Zero/Sign extends for CMSE security

2024-04-26 Thread Torbjorn SVENSSON
Hi, On 2024-04-25 16:25, Richard Ball wrote: Hi Torbjorn, Thanks very much for the comments. I think given that the code that handles this, is within a FOREACH_FUNCTION_ARGS loop. It seems a fairly safe assumption that if the code works for one that it will work for all. To go back and add

[Bug middle-end/111701] [11/12/13/14 Regression] wrong code for __builtin_signbit(x*x)

2024-04-26 Thread roger at nextmovesoftware dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111701 Roger Sayle changed: What|Removed |Added CC||roger at nextmovesoftware dot com ---

Results for 13.2.1 20240426 [releases/gcc-13 r13-8651-ge207b67fcd] (GCC) testsuite on powerpc64le-unknown-linux-gnu

2024-04-26 Thread Bill Seurer (POWER9 IEEE128) via Gcc-testresults
ss errors) === gcc Summary === # of expected passes165811 # of unexpected failures31 # of unexpected successes 3 # of expected failures 1481 # of unsupported tests 2973 /home/gccbuild/build/nightly/build-gcc-13/gcc/xgcc version 13.2.1 20240426 [relea

Re: [PATCH] wwwdocs: contribute.html: Update consensus on patch content.

2024-04-26 Thread Christophe Lyon
On Thu, 25 Apr 2024 at 17:44, Carlos O'Donell wrote: > > Discussion is here: > https://inbox.sourceware.org/gcc/CAPS5khZeWkAD=v8ka9g5eecdnk3bdhfnzjumpvc+hedmkvj...@mail.gmail.com/ > > Rough consensus from Jakub Jelinek, Richard Biener and others is > that maintainers are for the change. > > This

Results for 13.2.1 20240426 [releases/gcc-13 r13-8651-ge207b67fcde] (GCC) testsuite on i686-pc-linux-gnu

2024-04-26 Thread haochenj via Gcc-testresults
es psrl 2 === gcc Summary === # of expected passes184709 # of unexpected failures209 # of unexpected successes 31 # of expected failures 1470 # of unresolved testcases 114 # of unsupported tests 3568 /home/haochenj/src/gcc-13-

[PATCH] PR middle-end/111701: signbit(x*x) vs -fsignaling-nans

2024-04-26 Thread Roger Sayle
This patch addresses PR middle-end/111701 where optimization of signbit(x*x) using tree_nonnegative_p incorrectly eliminates a floating point multiplication when the operands may potentially be signaling NaNs. The above bug fix also provides a solution or work-around to the tricky issue in PR

Results for 13.2.1 20240426 [releases/gcc-13 r13-8650-g45816f7eef] (GCC) testsuite on powerpc64le-unknown-linux-gnu

2024-04-26 Thread Bill Seurer (POWER8) via Gcc-testresults
f expected failures 1550 # of unsupported tests 3992 /home/gccbuild/build/nightly/build-gcc-13/gcc/xgcc version 13.2.1 20240426 [releases/gcc-13 r13-8650-g45816f7eef] (GCC) === gfortran tests === Running target unix XPASS: gfortran.dg/large_real_kind_form_io_2

[Bug fortran/114859] Seeing new segmentation fault in same_type_as

2024-04-26 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114859 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek --- Oh, and start by disabling LTO and see if it makes a difference.

[Bug fortran/114859] Seeing new segmentation fault in same_type_as

2024-04-26 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114859 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek --- If it is Fortran FE, then the possible commits might be r14-9893 r14-9874 r14-9873 r14-9753 r14-9752 r14-9720 r14-9719 r14-9712 Anyway, best would be to try to compile the

[Bug target/114861] LoongArch: ICE building the kernel with -Os

2024-04-26 Thread xry111 at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114861 --- Comment #4 from Xi Ruoyao --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #3) > m for register_operand??? Hmm indeed, the m alternative should be removed. I must had been sleeping when I typed it...

[Bug libstdc++/114863] New: std::format applying grouping to nan's and inf's

2024-04-26 Thread lcarreon at bigpond dot net.au via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114863 Bug ID: 114863 Summary: std::format applying grouping to nan's and inf's Product: gcc Version: 13.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug fortran/114859] Seeing new segmentation fault in same_type_as

2024-04-26 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114859 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug libstdc++/114862] New: std::uppercase not applying to nan's and inf's

2024-04-26 Thread lcarreon at bigpond dot net.au via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114862 Bug ID: 114862 Summary: std::uppercase not applying to nan's and inf's Product: gcc Version: 13.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug target/114861] LoongArch: ICE building the kernel with -Os

2024-04-26 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114861 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug target/114861] LoongArch: ICE building the kernel with -Os

2024-04-26 Thread xry111 at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114861 Xi Ruoyao changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2 --- Comment #2 from Xi Ruoyao --- It

Results for 14.0.1 20240426 (experimental) [master revision gcc-14-10136-g9353f6f475b] (GCC) testsuite on aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu

2024-04-26 Thread ci_notify--- via Gcc-testresults
s8 # of expected failures 1908 # of unsupported tests 4368 /home/tcwg-buildslave/workspace/tcwg_gnu_0/abe/builds/destdir/aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu/bin/aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu-gcc version 14.0.1 20240426 (experimental) [master revision gcc-14-10136-g9353f6f

[Bug c++/114858] [11/12/13/14 regression] Compilation Hang and Excessive RAM Consumption in GCC with invalid input since r0-128725

2024-04-26 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114858 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[11/12/13/14 regression]|[11/12/13/14 regression]

[gcc r13-8651] gfortran: Allow ref'ing PDT's len() in parameter-initializer.

2024-04-26 Thread Harald Anlauf via Gcc-cvs
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e207b67fcde224f2be0c79bf2a24f7fc75b6f481 commit r13-8651-ge207b67fcde224f2be0c79bf2a24f7fc75b6f481 Author: Andre Vehreschild Date: Wed Jul 12 12:51:30 2023 +0200 gfortran: Allow ref'ing PDT's len() in parameter-initializer. Fix declaring a parameter

[Bug fortran/102003] [PDT] Length of character component not simplified

2024-04-26 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102003 --- Comment #6 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e207b67fcde224f2be0c79bf2a24f7fc75b6f481 commit r13-8651-ge207b67fcde224f2be0c79bf2a24f7fc75b6f481 Author: Andre

[Bug target/114861] LoongArch: ICE building the kernel with -Os

2024-04-26 Thread xry111 at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114861 --- Comment #1 from Xi Ruoyao --- Created attachment 58044 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=58044=edit Preprocessed source

[Bug target/114861] New: LoongArch: Fail to build the kernel with -Os

2024-04-26 Thread xry111 at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114861 Bug ID: 114861 Summary: LoongArch: Fail to build the kernel with -Os Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug target/114860] New: [aarch64] 511.povray regresses by ~5.5% with -O3 -flto -march=native -mcpu=neoverse-v2

2024-04-26 Thread prathamesh3492 at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114860 Bug ID: 114860 Summary: [aarch64] 511.povray regresses by ~5.5% with -O3 -flto -march=native -mcpu=neoverse-v2 Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

Results for 11.4.1 20240426 [releases/gcc-11 revision dca9066e7d:21c70355cc:881c6ec845c4cb7cb0fdd31a86dd0e539b6c84b3] (GCC) testsuite on powerpc64le-unknown-linux-gnu

2024-04-26 Thread Bill Seurer (POWER8) via Gcc-testresults
150371 # of unexpected failures176 # of unexpected successes 33 # of expected failures 985 # of unresolved testcases 2 # of unsupported tests 3769 /home/gccbuild/build/nightly/build-gcc-11/gcc/xgcc version 11.4.1 20240426 [releases/gcc-1

[Bug middle-end/114855] ICE: Segfault

2024-04-26 Thread jeremy.rutman at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114855 --- Comment #3 from jeremy rutman --- For what it's worth, clang is able to compile the code in question. Ubuntu clang version 18.1.3 (1) Target: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu Thread model: posix InstalledDir: /usr/bin

<    1   2   3