https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104688
--- Comment #12 from Jakub Jelinek ---
I've posted the patches (so far only lightly tested):
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2022-November/606021.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2022-November/606022.html
It is still
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107634
--- Comment #10 from Eric Botcazou ---
> About the number of files. Yes, that's the biggest change when it comes to
> Sphinx and I see it also as a drawback. However, it's the only valid file
> naming scheme supported by Sphinx and there are
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107672
Bug ID: 107672
Summary: [13 Regression] ICE during GIMPLE pass: slp
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106854
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ericb at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #8
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107669
seurer at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104688
Xi Ruoyao changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|gcc and libatomic can use |gcc and libatomic can use
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104688
--- Comment #11 from Sam James ---
(In reply to GGanesh from comment #10)
> Can we extend this patch to AMD processors as well. If not, I will plan to
> submit the patch for stage-1!
GCC 13 (as of today) is in stage 3 - see
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95349
--- Comment #44 from Andrew Downing ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #43)
> (In reply to Andrew Downing from comment #41)
> > > Thus for types without a non-trivial ctor/dtor you do not need to use
> > > placement new. So take your
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105611
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107671
--- Comment #2 from Iain Buclaw ---
Expected generated code would be:
---
bt32_setb*:
...
shrl$5, %edx
movl(%eax,%edx,4), %edx
xorl%eax, %eax
btl %ecx, %edx
setb%al
...
---
bt32_setae*:
...
shrl$5, %edx
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107671
--- Comment #1 from Iain Buclaw ---
Non-pointer variants also not detected.
---
int bt32v_setb(const __UINT32_TYPE__ v, __UINT32_TYPE__ bitnum)
{
return ((v & (1 << (bitnum & 31 != 0;
}
int bt64v_setb(const __UINT64_TYPE__ v,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107671
Bug ID: 107671
Summary: i386: Missed optimization: use of bt in bit test
pattern when LHS is an array index
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104688
GGanesh changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||Ganesh.Gopalasubramanian@am
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107670
Bug ID: 107670
Summary: Suspicious redundant code in ipa-cp
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: ipa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107669
Bug ID: 107669
Summary: [13 Regression] commit
r13-3931-59a63247992eb13153b82c4902aadf111460eac2
causes lots of testcase failure
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106235
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106235
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by David Malcolm :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d777b38cde91a87f2345dcd13901862a9513562a
commit r13-3947-gd777b38cde91a87f2345dcd13901862a9513562a
Author: David Malcolm
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104167
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Patch for time zones and incomplete formatting support:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2022-November/605926.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107668
--- Comment #2 from David Binderman ---
Reduced C++ code seems to be:
--- /home/dcb36/cvise/bug862.cc ---
float dot();
float intersectcylinder_md;
void intersectcylinder(float ) {
float nd = dot();
dist = 0 / nd;
float offset =
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107668
David Binderman changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dcb314 at hotmail dot com
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106235
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94104
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107660
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #4)
> std::mt19937
r11-4535-g822c1d21a3c710
Hmm, this might be expected
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94104
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:58e7732a2feddf475e72b232bf16494d84a41acf
commit r13-3946-g58e7732a2feddf475e72b232bf16494d84a41acf
Author: José Rui Faustino de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107660
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski ---
std::mt19937
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97052
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||wjwray at gmail dot com
--- Comment #6
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107662
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||9.5.0
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107662
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
Created attachment 53894
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=53894=edit
testcase
Next time please paste the testcase instead of just a link to godbolt .
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107650
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #3)
> (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #0)
> > The texinfo generated HTML has an up link which links to the section that
> > the page is linked from.
> > While
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107656
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #2)
> Yes, it's a small drawback.
IT IS NOT A SMALL DRAWBACK. It is a huge one really. Especially when a new
developer is trying to write a backend, they can't figure
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107651
--- Comment #12 from Andrew Pinski ---
Created attachment 53893
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=53893=edit
Screen shot of the index
When I see a row like these rows, I think __builtin_mips_any_cabs_cond_ps (C++
function)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107651
--- Comment #11 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #10)
> > But the sphinx generated index is not very useful as it lists all options
> > under symbols heading which is very confusing to programmers.
>
> It's a minor
x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
Configured with: /repo/gcc-trunk//configure --enable-languages=c,c++
--enable-valgrind-annotations --disable-nls --enable-checking=yes,rtl,df,extra
--disable-bootstrap --with-cloog --with-ppl --with-isl
--build=x86_64-pc-linux-gnu --host=x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
--target=x86_64-pc-linux-gnu --with-ld=/usr/bin/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-ld
--with-as=/usr/bin/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-as --disable-libstdcxx-pch
--prefix=/repo/gcc-trunk//binary-trunk-r13-3944-20221113164720-g43435c7eb0f-checking-yes-rtl-df-extra-nobootstrap-amd64
Thread model: posix
Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib zstd
gcc version 13.0.0 20221113 (experimental) (GCC)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107650
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107656
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107653
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107651
--- Comment #10 from Martin Liška ---
> But the sphinx generated index is not very useful as it lists all options
> under symbols heading which is very confusing to programmers.
It's a minor limitation, one can still jump to individual
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107651
--- Comment #9 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #8)
> You can quickly find 'vectorize' option in the sphinx version of the Index.
But the sphinx generated index is not very useful as it lists all options under
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107643
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #14 from Martin
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107643
--- Comment #13 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #12)
> (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #11)
> > (In reply to CVS Commits from comment #8)
> >
> > > It is confusing that 'Indexes and tables' contains
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107634
--- Comment #9 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #7)
> c-behavior/architecture.rst
> c-behavior/arrays-and-pointers.rst
> c-behavior/characters.rst
> c-behavior/declarators.rst
> c-behavior/environment.rst
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107634
--- Comment #8 from Martin Liška ---
About the number of files. Yes, that's the biggest change when it comes to
Sphinx and I see it also as a drawback. However, it's the only valid file
naming scheme supported by Sphinx and there are projects
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107643
--- Comment #12 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #11)
> (In reply to CVS Commits from comment #8)
>
> > It is confusing that 'Indexes and tables' contains TODO. One gets
> > Index by clicking to the Index
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107634
--- Comment #7 from Martin Liška ---
So first to the original issue reported by David. Yes, the filenames were
selected based on chapter's caption and thus some of them are very long. For
gcc documentation, I'm suggesting following name scheme
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107650
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
Index is different from TOC. The up should goto the section TOC and not the
index of the section.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107643
--- Comment #11 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to CVS Commits from comment #8)
> It is confusing that 'Indexes and tables' contains TODO. One gets
> Index by clicking to the Index link.
I don't see an Index link. There is no link to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107655
Bug 107655 depends on bug 107643, which changed state.
Bug 107643 Summary: [13 Regression] sphinx generated indexes are not working at
all
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107643
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107643
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|NEW
Resolution|FIXED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107643
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107655
Bug 107655 depends on bug 107643, which changed state.
Bug 107643 Summary: [13 Regression] sphinx generated indexes are not working at
all
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107643
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107643
--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Martin Liska :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c64fd69420fd153f9fb16a603ff0a711fbde8335
commit r13-3942-gc64fd69420fd153f9fb16a603ff0a711fbde8335
Author: Martin Liska
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107667
--- Comment #1 from Christoph Müllner ---
RFC patch can be found on list:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2022-November/605936.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107666
--- Comment #1 from Christoph Müllner ---
RFC patch can be found on list:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2022-November/605934.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107655
Bug 107655 depends on bug 107620, which changed state.
Bug 107620 Summary: Build errors when using sphinx
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107620
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107620
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107620
--- Comment #5 from Martin Liška ---
> Is the above error due to not installing sphinx 5.3.0?
Yes, and you should get a better message now.
> I assumed installing sphinx 5.3.0 would help, but after installing sphinx
> 5.3.0, I get a different
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107620
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Martin Liska :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5e749ee3019d7917184af30dab8d09c933c0a4a1
commit r13-3940-g5e749ee3019d7917184af30dab8d09c933c0a4a1
Author: Martin Liska
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107667
Bug ID: 107667
Summary: IPA: Speculatively reuse existing specializations
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107666
Bug ID: 107666
Summary: IPA: Speculatively dereferencing function pointers
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107661
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107661
Sergei Trofimovich changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[13 Regression] lambdas get |[13 Regression] lambdas get
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107643
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107651
--- Comment #8 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #6)
> Also search bars are not very useful if you say searching for an option and
> it turns up non option related stuff.
It's not searching only options, but also in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107651
--- Comment #7 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #3)
> Your index page has both options and symbols intermixed and not two
> different pages. Funny how you said one thing and it is exact opposite.
Index page
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107651
--- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski ---
Also search bars are not very useful if you say searching for an option and it
turns up non option related stuff.
An example of that is you search for vectorize you it turns up the extension
page.
Indexes
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107651
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski ---
Oh wait I just realized that symbol here is -. That is just useless. And even
not ignoring f or m as part of the option in the index will also be useless and
just having parts in m and f.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107651
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski ---
Symbols are listed separately but again not on a separate page. Plus the two
columns make it difficult to read on mobile. Again this still different from my
request too.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107655
Bug 107655 depends on bug 107651, which changed state.
Bug 107651 Summary: Having two different kind of indexes is very useful still
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107651
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107651
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|INVALID |---
Status|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107643
--- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #3)
> The preferred way of searching is using the Search text input on the left.
> It works very well.
Expect if you don't know the name of an option reading the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107655
Bug 107655 depends on bug 107643, which changed state.
Bug 107643 Summary: [13 Regression] sphinx generated indexes are not working at
all
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107643
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107643
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED
Resolution|INVALID
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107498
--- Comment #11 from Eric Botcazou ---
> FWIW, the issue does not show when compiling with clang.
This probably means that GCC generates better/smaller code then.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107655
Bug 107655 depends on bug 107651, which changed state.
Bug 107651 Summary: Having two different kind of indexes is very useful still
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107651
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107651
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107655
Bug 107655 depends on bug 107643, which changed state.
Bug 107643 Summary: [13 Regression] sphinx generated indexes are not working at
all
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107643
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107643
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107643
--- Comment #3 from Martin Liška ---
The preferred way of searching is using the Search text input on the left. It
works very well.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107643
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107644
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107621
--- Comment #8 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #6)
> How does this fancy stuff work on a text based browser like links or lynx?
It works very well based on what I've seen using lynx browser.
> Do we really need
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107655
Bug 107655 depends on bug 107621, which changed state.
Bug 107621 Summary: sphinx generated documents has too much white space on the
top
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107621
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107621
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107620
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107498
--- Comment #10 from John Paul Adrian Glaubitz ---
(In reply to Eric Botcazou from comment #9)
> > Program received signal SIGBUS, Bus error.
> > 0x010ceda4 in mdb_node_add (mc=0x14327b8, indx=,
> > key=0x7fee0a0,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107498
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107326
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105867
Andrea Griffini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||agriff at tin dot it
--- Comment #4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107638
Jan-Benedict Glaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jbg...@lug-owl.de
--- Comment #2
89 matches
Mail list logo
