[Bug target/89835] The RISC-V target uses amoswap.w for relaxed stores

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89835 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added CC||law at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug libstdc++/84568] libstdc++-v3 configure checks for atomic operations fail on riscv

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84568 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added CC||law at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug target/113742] ICE: RTL check: expected elt 1 type 'i' or 'n', have 'e' (rtx set) in riscv_macro_fusion_pair_p, at config/riscv/riscv.cc:8416 with -O2 -finstrument-functions -mtune=sifive-p600-se

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113742 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added CC||law at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug sanitizer/59748] ptrace isn't instrumented on at least arm-linux-gnueabihf and powerpc-linux.gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59748 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski --- I didn't see an issue filed upstream (neither https://github.com/google/sanitizers nor https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues ). Has one been filed and has this since been fixed?

[Bug target/114544] [x86] stv should transform (subreg DI (V1TI) 8) as (vec_select:DI (V2DI) (const_int 1))

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114544 --- Comment #3 from Hongtao Liu --- <__umodti3>: ... 37 58: 66 48 0f 6e c7 movq %rdi,%xmm0 38 5d: 66 48 0f 6e d6 movq %rsi,%xmm2 39 62: 66 0f 6c c2 punpcklqdq %xmm2,%xmm0 40 66:

[Bug c++/114632] ICE with explicit this in lambda

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114632 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2024-04-08

[Bug c++/114632] New: ICE with explicit this in lambda

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114632 Bug ID: 114632 Summary: ICE with explicit this in lambda Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug target/57037] GCC does not generate non-temporal stores on i386 with SSE2+

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57037 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug testsuite/114614] New test case gcc.misc-tests/gcov-20.c from r14-9789-g08a52331803f66 fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114614 Kewen Lin changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Ever confirmed|0

[Bug target/112919] LoongArch: Alignments in tune parameters are not precise and they regress performance

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112919 --- Comment #22 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by LuluCheng : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8f0ff6b998748f3581e0f06e3108193866b1209d commit r14-9824-g8f0ff6b998748f3581e0f06e3108193866b1209d Author: Lulu Cheng Date: Tue

[Bug target/60157] adding -mstrict-align for i386 and x86_64 architecture

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60157 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic --- Comment #1 from Andrew

[Bug other/44414] hashtab.h functions are undocumented

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44414 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Target Milestone|---

[Bug c++/114631] Inconsistent behavior with infinite loops?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114631 --- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Ganton from comment #3) > When that page (https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTBUG-33026) was written, > the behavior of GCC was not like the described in this bug report (because > the `for (doub

[Bug c++/114631] Inconsistent behavior with infinite loops?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114631 --- Comment #3 from Ganton --- Note: That code was initially aimed for `decimal32` testing (https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTBUG-33026) because using `decimal32` instead of `double`... the `for (doub = [...]` loop is not infinite. When that

[Bug middle-end/93041] GCC 10 removes an infinite loop and causes a null pointer to dereferenced

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93041 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kubry at gmx dot com --- Comment #10

[Bug c++/114631] Inconsistent behavior with infinite loops?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114631 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/114631] Inconsistent behavior with infinite loops?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114631 --- Comment #1 from Ganton --- Maybe this can be useful: "if we remove the `std::cout << doub << " ";` line... the program stops"... does that happen because an "aggressive"(?樂) optimization is made (without warning the user)? If we add a

[Bug c++/114631] New: Inconsistent behavior with infinite loops?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114631 Bug ID: 114631 Summary: Inconsistent behavior with infinite loops? Product: gcc Version: 13.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug target/114544] [x86] stv should transform (subreg DI (V1TI) 8) as (vec_select:DI (V2DI) (const_int 1))

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114544 Roger Sayle changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2024-04-07

[Bug tree-optimization/99395] s116 benchmark of TSVC is vectorized by clang and not by gcc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99395 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |enhancement

[Bug c++/99426] [modules] failed to read compiled module cluster 1186: Bad file data

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99426 --- Comment #10 from Nick Begg --- Testcase created in PR114630... Thanks

[Bug c++/114630] New: [modules] building module with submodule causes corrupt gcm

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114630 Bug ID: 114630 Summary: [modules] building module with submodule causes corrupt gcm Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug middle-end/114628] ICE with _BitInt with computed gotos with returns_twice and -g and optimization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114628 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[14 Regression] ICE in |ICE with _BitInt with

[Bug fortran/106317] deferred-length character array pointer in derived type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106317 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Known to fail||10.5.0, 11.4.1, 12.3.0,

[Bug rust/114629] rust-ast-resolve-expr contains bloated code for funny_error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114629 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|

[Bug libfortran/113897] Consecutive tab and/or nX edits in format are not processed correctly.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113897 Jerry DeLisle changed: What|Removed |Added CC||urbanjost at comcast dot net ---

[Bug libfortran/114618] Format produces incorrect output when contains 1x, ok when uses " "

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114618 Jerry DeLisle changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE

[Bug fortran/114611] H edit descriptor should flag as error with -std-f95 (or higher)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114611 Jerry DeLisle changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug fortran/114626] Very long time for compilation the attached program, depends on value of a parameter

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114626 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill

[Bug fortran/114474] [11/12/13/14 Regression] DATA statement with derived type, pointer component rejected

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114474 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug fortran/114474] [11/12/13/14 Regression] DATA statement with derived type, pointer component rejected

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114474 --- Comment #7 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:619fc13043c86d616ef57cb31f8ac5d29b059ade commit r11-11311-g619fc13043c86d616ef57cb31f8ac5d29b059ade Author: Harald Anlauf

[Bug fortran/114474] [11/12/13/14 Regression] DATA statement with derived type, pointer component rejected

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114474 --- Comment #6 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:88abe04de2f16f773126f3908632a27568330cc9 commit r12-10314-g88abe04de2f16f773126f3908632a27568330cc9 Author: Harald Anlauf

[Bug fortran/114474] [11/12/13/14 Regression] DATA statement with derived type, pointer component rejected

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114474 --- Comment #5 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0d4862691d2b58f7bd2d58de0e78bc574c313d39 commit r13-8592-g0d4862691d2b58f7bd2d58de0e78bc574c313d39 Author: Harald Anlauf

[Bug rust/114629] New: rust-ast-resolve-expr contains bloated code for funny_error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114629 Bug ID: 114629 Summary: rust-ast-resolve-expr contains bloated code for funny_error Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/99426] [modules] failed to read compiled module cluster 1186: Bad file data

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99426 --- Comment #9 from Patrick Palka --- Huh, interesting! If --param=ggc-min-expand=1 doesn't help then it's most likely a distinct bug. A testcase would be much appreciated if possible.

[Bug c++/99426] [modules] failed to read compiled module cluster 1186: Bad file data

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99426 --- Comment #8 from Nick Begg --- I've been testing with the proposed patch, and I am still getting the same errors.. /home/nick/inst/gcc-trunk-debug/bin/g++ -g -std=gnu++23 -Wall -Wextra -freport-bug --param=ggc-min-expand=1 -MD -MT

[Bug rtl-optimization/113017] ICE in delete_unmarked_insns, at dce.cc:653 while compiling gfortran.dg/inline_matmul_9.f90 for aarch64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113017 Filip Kastl changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|ICE in |ICE in

[Bug middle-end/114628] [14 Regression] ICE in gimple_check_failed at gimple.cc:1337 while compiling bitint-100.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114628 Filip Kastl changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |14.0

[Bug middle-end/114628] New: [14 Regression] ICE in gimple_check_failed at gimple.cc:1337 while compiling bitint-100.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114628 Bug ID: 114628 Summary: [14 Regression] ICE in gimple_check_failed at gimple.cc:1337 while compiling bitint-100.c Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug middle-end/114627] [14 Regression] undefined behavior in tree-profile.cc while compiling gcc.misc-tests/gcov-18.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114627 Filip Kastl changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |14.0

[Bug middle-end/114627] New: [14 Regression] undefined behavior in tree-profile.cc while compiling gcc.misc-tests/gcov-18.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114627 Bug ID: 114627 Summary: [14 Regression] undefined behavior in tree-profile.cc while compiling gcc.misc-tests/gcov-18.c Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/114625] requires { T{}; } wrongly accepted when T{} is ill-formed while in concept

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114625 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug fortran/114626] New: Very long time for compilation the attached program, depends on value of a parameter

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114626 Bug ID: 114626 Summary: Very long time for compilation the attached program, depends on value of a parameter Product: gcc Version: 12.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/114625] requires { T{}; } wrongly accepted when T{} is ill-formed while in concept

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114625 Ted Lyngmo changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|requires { T{}; } wrongly |requires { T{}; } wrongly

[Bug c++/114625] New: requires { T{}; } wrongly accepted when T{} is ill-formed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114625 Bug ID: 114625 Summary: requires { T{}; } wrongly accepted when T{} is ill-formed Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/113233] LoongArch: target options from LTO objects not respected during linking

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113233 Xi Ruoyao changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|12.4|---

[Bug target/113233] LoongArch: target options from LTO objects not respected during linking

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113233 Xi Ruoyao changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Resolution|FIXED

[Bug tree-optimization/114624] [14 Regression] ICE on valid code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu: Segmentation fault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114624 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|ice-checking| --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski

[Bug tree-optimization/114624] [14 Regression] ICE on valid code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu: Segmentation fault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114624 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/114624] [14 Regression] ICE on valid code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu: Segmentation fault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114624 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|ICE on valid code at -O3 on |[14 Regression] ICE on

[Bug middle-end/114624] New: ICE on valid code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu: Segmentation fault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114624 Bug ID: 114624 Summary: ICE on valid code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu: Segmentation fault Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug tree-optimization/90905] missing -Wreturn-local-addr returning a local std::string::c_str()

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90905 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed|2020-01-28 00:00:00 |2024-4-7 --- Comment #10 from Andrew