https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114629
--- Comment #8 from Iain Sandoe ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #5)
> (In reply to Pierre-Emmanuel Patry from comment #2)
> While you are at it, it would be useful to add a link to the rust langauge
> specification (like there is
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114629
--- Comment #7 from Marc Poulhiès ---
There's no language spec yet, it's WIP:
https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/113527
Currently, the reference is rustc and the goal is to match its current
behavior.
I think the frontend is not listed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114629
--- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #5)
> While you are at it, it would be useful to add a link to the rust langauge
> specification (like there is for almost all other languages [I see
> objective-C is
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114629
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Pierre-Emmanuel Patry from comment #2)
> I can see the problem with the message, but I don't think we can remove the
> behavior as we have to match rustc's behavior. The compiler has to ICE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114629
Iain Sandoe changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||iains at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114629
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
is that part of the language standard? I don't think we have to copy rustc
easter eggs - in fact I'd report this as a bug to them.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114629
Pierre-Emmanuel Patry changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pierre-emmanuel.patry@embec
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114629
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
