Re: [Gendergap] Women on the list: what have you been editing lately?

2013-05-23 Thread Jane Darnell
Ryan, I feel the same way, and I keep wondering what I can do to help populate Wikimedia Commons categories of artists. I feel quite proud of the list I produced, and I uploaded a bunch of images to get it this long. I have been fascinated by the stories of the women on the list and made two

Re: [Gendergap] Category:Nude portrayals of computer technology

2013-05-23 Thread Joseph Reagle
On 05/23/2013 02:58 PM, Jane Darnell wrote: How strange that people take the trouble to upload those! I've been wondering about this myself. Why do people port collections of images from Flickr CC to Commons in the first place? If someone really needed a weird nude picture for an article,

Re: [Gendergap] Category:Nude portrayals of computer technology

2013-05-23 Thread Pete Forsyth
On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 2:27 PM, Joseph Reagle joseph.2...@reagle.orgwrote: On 05/23/2013 02:58 PM, Jane Darnell wrote: How strange that people take the trouble to upload those! I've been wondering about this myself. Why do people port collections of images from Flickr CC to Commons in the

Re: [Gendergap] Category:Nude portrayals of computer technology

2013-05-23 Thread Jane Darnell
Well I suppose that on some level the people who upload those images believe them to be artistic in some way. After looking at most of the artist categories of the 17th century, I have noticed that it's generally the tits-and-ass images that find their way on to Wikipedia first. I myself have

Re: [Gendergap] Category:Nude portrayals of computer technology

2013-05-23 Thread Sarah Stierch
When someone said how come no one makes a big deal about category:foo when category:blahporn is always getting messed with!! and i ended up nominating a ton of crappy flower photos for deletion. It was pretty funny, and dear god there are some crappy flower photos. Why have crappy photos. It's

Re: [Gendergap] Category:Nude portrayals of computer technology

2013-05-23 Thread Russavia
Well you do realise that now you are an admin your days of browsing any type of pr0n are behind you. ;) You are right, no-one in their right mind would use Commons to search for pr0n. I just did a search for big dick on Google, and there is one result from a WMF project in the Top 100 results --

Re: [Gendergap] Category:Nude portrayals of computer technology

2013-05-23 Thread Russavia
Well you do realise that now you are an admin your days of browsing any type of pr0n are behind you. ;) You are right, no-one in their right mind would use Commons to search for pr0n. I just did a search for big dick on Google, and there is one result from a WMF project in the Top 100 results --

Re: [Gendergap] Category:Nude portrayals of computer technology

2013-05-23 Thread Sarah Stierch
On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 6:12 PM, Russavia russavia.wikipe...@gmail.comwrote: Well you do realise that now you are an admin your days of browsing any type of pr0n are behind you. ;) You are right, no-one in their right mind would use Commons to search for pr0n. I just did a search for big

Re: [Gendergap] Category:Nude portrayals of computer technology

2013-05-23 Thread Jane Darnell
Yes, I totally agree with the beer spitting part, and also wish you lots of luck and patience with your adminship! Most people don't realize that of the 15 million files on Commons, 99% of the ones *not* linked into a sister project are pretty well unfindable unless you happen to google the

Re: [Gendergap] Category:Nude portrayals of computer technology

2013-05-23 Thread Daniel and Elizabeth Case
I use Commons to look at bird pr0n (birds..like...real...birds...the one's that fly and have feathers) and pinball machines. So whatever. Confession: I have taken and uploaded one of those bird-porn photos: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Cockatiels_mating.jpg We still have one of