Hi -
I actually professionally consult with GLAMs (galleries, libraries,
archives and museums) regarding the copyright of their images and the
content within them and how copyright works. I have worked with everyone
from the Smithsonian Institution to the Getty regarding opening their
cultural
On 22 October 2014 17:17, Sarah Stierch sarah.stie...@gmail.com wrote:
To be brutally honest: the university can claim copyright over the
photographs of those images all they want but they will lose that case in a
court of law if the photograph is of an object that was created before 1923.
The University does actually have a pretty good statement here:
http://uwdc.library.wisc.edu/about/copyright
The key issue would more likely be that some of the articles are still
under natural copyright, such as this one:
On 22 October 2014 17:38, Risker risker...@gmail.com wrote:
The key issue would more likely be that some of the articles are still under
natural copyright, such as this one:
Hi, Sarah!
I would agree if we were only discussing the faithful reproduction of 2D
pre-1923 images (which is what I believe was the National Portrait Gallery
situation).
But the bulk of subject matter in this Dovie Horvitz collection appears to
be 3D objects (clothes to curling irons). I
