On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 5:06 AM, Carol Moore DC carolmoor...@verizon.netwrote:
It took forever to get the actual article [[Circle jerk]] into Wikipedia
- a female did it.
Now, now, Carol. The record shows that *I* created the circle jerk article,
and I am not a female.
It's two very different issues to argue about a) whether dirty word DYKs
drive off women (I'm on record on Jimbo's talk as thinking that's silly),
and b) whether dirty word DYKs are puerile and not as good a type of joke
as we should be doing, if we want to do jokes (which appears to be
basically
On 1/17/2013 1:24 PM, Andreas Kolbe wrote:
On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 5:06 AM, Carol Moore DC
carolmoor...@verizon.net mailto:carolmoor...@verizon.net wrote:
It took forever to get the actual article [[Circle jerk]] into
Wikipedia - a female did it.
Now, now, Carol. The record shows
On 1/17/13 6:17 PM, Carol Moore DC wrote:
On 1/17/2013 1:24 PM, Andreas Kolbe wrote:
On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 5:06 AM, Carol Moore DC
carolmoor...@verizon.net mailto:carolmoor...@verizon.net wrote:
It took forever to get the actual article [[Circle jerk]] into
Wikipedia - a female did
On 17 January 2013 22:33, Risker risker...@gmail.com wrote:
There was actually a good suggestion for one on the TFA talk pagefor
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sacred_Cod_of_Massachusetts
It's already at GA, needs significant polishing and filling in of gaps,
but is easily do-able for
Someone will find anything done not funny.
That said, body parts humor is rarely a soaring example of high humor.
If I didn't think it would go over so badly I'd do the sort of
efforts I used to do on Usenet here, but it seems to be taken badly no
matter what.
-george
On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at
On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 7:23 AM, Risker risker...@gmail.com wrote:
I don't know that they contribute to the gender imbalance - although in
fairness the women who make it as far as adminship and discussions on
Jimbo's page tend to be unusually thick-skinned (I mean it as a
compliment!). I
On 1/16/2013 2:23 AM, Risker wrote:
Although I think it probably says something about the general
mentality of a significant portion of our editorship what was being
proposed for April Fool's day - sex, body parts, and swearing. Hmmm.
Risker/Anne
I stooped to that level and added the one
http://thewikipedian.net/2013/01/15/wikifoolery/
April Fools' Day http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/April_Fools%27_Dayis
still about 2 1/2 months off, butWikipedians are already planning
On 15 January 2013 21:09, Sarah Stierch sarah.stie...@gmail.com wrote:
http://thewikipedian.net/2013/01/15/wikifoolery/
April Fools’ Day http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/April_Fools%27_Day is
still about 2 1/2 months off, but Wikipedians are already
10 matches
Mail list logo
