On Sat, Oct 1, 2011 at 3:29 PM, Daniel and Elizabeth Case
danc...@frontiernet.net wrote:
I love the idea of having articles of gender concern in a one stop shopping
space. Going through the NPOV collection is long, painful and is filled with
lots of advertising articles for tech companies.
Just a reminder, we have a conversation started here about it:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Feminism#Gender_neutrality_template
I also brought up the use of some templates used for gender studies. If we
can start contributing to the wiki about this, that'd be
...@frontiernet.net
Subject: Re: [Gendergap] Gender neutrality template
To: Increasing female participation in Wikimedia projects
gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
Date: Saturday, 1 October, 2011, 20:29
I love the idea of having articles of
gender concern in a one stop shopping space. Going through
There are other more powerful groups that would use the precedent to
create a template that would censor a number of articles that already
are heavily patrolled and censored by organized groups of editors (many
of them surely paid, not that they'd ever admit it).
Instead use the POV template
We also have a controversial template...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Controversial
I love the idea of having articles of gender concern in a one stop shopping
space. Going through the NPOV collection is long, painful and is filled with
lots of advertising articles for tech companies.
I love the idea of having articles of gender concern in a one stop shopping
space. Going through the NPOV collection is long, painful and is filled with
lots of advertising articles for tech companies. Blarg
-Sarah
I agree with a gender-specific tag as well. NPOV is (by design)
What do you think about creating a {{gendergap}} or {{GNPOV}} (gender-neutral
point of view) template in en:WP? This could have a format similar to
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:NPOV
and could use an image like
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Igualtat_de_sexes.svg
The text could
Andreas, my preference would be to stick with the NPOV banner we have (which is
pretty sufficient for all manner of non-neutrality issues), and instead
encourage people who use it to actually open a discussion on the talk page when
applying the template.
It is all too common that someone will
