It has been concerning me for a while reading this discussion that the
accusations rest heavily on an expectation that everyone can and should
master English (and even American English) as well as write the language in
an acceptable tone. This is a huge ask. Getting the tone right demands a
very
I apologize if you are offended and find this discouraging, but I am not
apologizing for what I've said. And putting a happy face at the end of your
comment does not mean you haven't invalidated my opinions. I voiced opinions
that I know several people on this list, let alone many women on
[mailto:gendergap-boun...@lists.wikimedia.org] Im Auftrag von Maggie
Gesendet: Samstag, 1. Oktober 2011 19:38
An: gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
Betreff: Re: [Gendergap] Gendergap Digest, Vol 9, Issue 5
I apologize if you are offended and find this discouraging, but I am not
apologizing for what I've said
Hi
I am mostly active on other ML and signed on to Gender gap list solely to
respond to Maggie and Sarah. Let me be clear, Rupert thruner and Pete are
both right, you were not nice at all in your previous response and
border-line uncivil, Maggie. And you are not blunt, maybe slightly
misinformed.
--- On Sat, 1/10/11, Theo10011 de10...@gmail.com wrote:
Sarah, I am not sure what you've been trying to say lately[2].
Rest assured that it made perfect sense to others. ;)
A.___
Gendergap mailing list
Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
On Sun, Oct 2, 2011 at 1:34 AM, Andreas Kolbe jayen...@yahoo.com wrote:
--- On *Sat, 1/10/11, Theo10011 de10...@gmail.com* wrote:
Sarah, I am not sure what you've been trying to say lately[2].
Rest assured that it made perfect sense to others. ;)
Wonderful, now I can finally sleep in
On Sat, Oct 1, 2011 at 14:25, Theo10011 de10...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Oct 2, 2011 at 1:34 AM, Andreas Kolbe jayen...@yahoo.com wrote:
--- On *Sat, 1/10/11, Theo10011 de10...@gmail.com* wrote:
Sarah, I am not sure what you've been trying to say lately[2].
Rest assured that it made
On Oct 1, 2011, at 1:25 PM, Theo10011 wrote:
Wonderful, now I can finally sleep in peace knowing that it made sense to you.
Theo..please calm down. Plenty of us read and understand Sarah's posts, plenty
of us read and understand your posts. This is not us vs. them. If you're
feeling worked up
On Sat, Oct 1, 2011 at 1:38 PM, Maggie rockerre...@gmail.com wrote:
snip
Second, she referred to women as girls. Which, as far as I know with any
woman, is incredibly insulting and a way of one-upping someone. I'll assume
you are a man because your name is Rupert. I'm sure you know if another
On Sat, Oct 1, 2011 at 21:27, Nathan nawr...@gmail.com wrote:
... (On the other hand, people on
this list have a habit of using males to refer to men and women to
refer to women. Flip side of the same coin, perhaps?).
Interesting point, Nathan, that I hadn't noticed. But I have noticed
the
10 matches
Mail list logo
