...I went throughin what took weeks, and Wikidata'd the heck out of
everyone on this list.
The worst articles, the one's that need a lot of work, are the bottom half,
for sure. The funniest to read is the Gisele Bundchen article. It needs a
lot of work...to say the least and doesn't seem to
Sarah you are such a champ! Thank you for slogging through all this!
On Jun 28, 2014, at 11:19 PM, Sarah Stierch sarah.stie...@gmail.com wrote:
I just noticed I wrote to say the least and needs a lot of work multiple
times.
My brain is melting :)
-Sarah
On Sat, Jun 28, 2014
I've just wikified this in my userspace if anyone wants to quickly check
out our articles on these women. The good news is that we have an article
for each of them. The bad news is that article quality is pretty grim if
these are truly the 100 most powerful women.
Hi Andrew,
Absolutely! Please do.
Yes, it was nice to see some FA and GAs in the mix. Maybe we should
compare a list of 100 most powerful men?
Toby
On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 6:02 AM, Andrew Gray andrew.g...@dunelm.org.uk
wrote:
Stub tags are notoriously bad for this (I've just rerated half a
Hi Risker,
Of course you are right, but that is true across the encylopedia, so the
relative abundances are probably comparable.
Sorting by category is interesting. We're doing particularly poorly for
the women in business or technology, not too bad for women in politics, and
pretty well for
I didn't find a men only list, but their list of powerful people looks
close enough. (!)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:99of9/powerpeople
I'll leave the ratings until after Andrew re-rates them ;-), but already
there's a male redlink at #36 most powerful - interesting gap.
Toby
On Tue,
Well that's quite a quick leap :) I randomly barged in to Lila in an
elevator a couple weeks ago (in all seriousness), and had a brief
conversation with her. I am quite excited to see what the transition
brings.
Best,
Kevin Gorman
On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 2:50 PM, Risker risker...@gmail.com
