On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 4:11 PM, Sarah Stierch sarah.stie...@gmail.comwrote:
+1
Do we have a Mind the Gap Gender Gap barnstar yet? :)
This is a really cool barnstar idea! Any graphic geniuses who can do this?
pb
___
Philippe Beaudette
Head of Reader Relations
Wikimedia
FYI: Mind the Gap is an ancient(?) achievement in a couple video
games about skateboarding.
On 9/29/11 11:33 PM, Philippe Beaudette wrote:
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 4:11 PM, Sarah Stierch sarah.stie...@gmail.com
mailto:sarah.stie...@gmail.com wrote:
+1
Do we have a Mind
http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/foundation-l/2011-September/069078.html
_
*Béria Lima*
Wikimedia Portugal http://wikimedia.pt
(351) 963 953 042
*Imagine um mundo onde é dada a qualquer pessoa a possibilidade de ter livre
acesso ao somatório de todo o conhecimento humano. É isso o que
Well, at least this confirms that there are a 14 photos of dudes getting
their *own* rocks off on Commons! Thank god! (Oh...speaking of
permissions...)
You also have to scroll down a bit in Google search before you come across
the article after searching sucking your own cock. The fact that the
Hi Folks - I just posted my thoughts on a Change the Ratio campaign for
Wikipediahttp://1x57.com/2011/09/30/changing-the-ratio-wikipedias-battle-for-diversity-part-iii/,
that includes a logo my company created with the design help of JESS3 (who
did that State of Wikipedia video:
Hey guys!
So, I've been speaking at Girl Geek Dinner events in the UK, spreading the
good word about what it is we do, having editing sessions and then getting
feedback from women on why they don't edit, or if they do, how they think
Wikipedia can be improved to be more women-friendly. It's
What do you think about creating a {{gendergap}} or {{GNPOV}} (gender-neutral
point of view) template in en:WP? This could have a format similar to
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:NPOV
and could use an image like
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Igualtat_de_sexes.svg
The text could
Andreas, my preference would be to stick with the NPOV banner we have (which is
pretty sufficient for all manner of non-neutrality issues), and instead
encourage people who use it to actually open a discussion on the talk page when
applying the template.
It is all too common that someone will
Twice recently I have been reverted for removing vulgar jokes from
article talk pages on the English Wikipedia - most recently for removing
a joke who's punchline was A woman's anus after she was sodomized!.
Although I appreciate the use of humor on Wikipedia, and support the
inclusion of
Twice recently I have been reverted for removing vulgar jokes from
article talk pages on the English Wikipedia - most recently for removing
a joke who's punchline was A woman's anus after she was sodomized!.
Although I appreciate the use of humor on Wikipedia, and support the
inclusion of
It seems from my experience that WP:RD2 is usually interpreted fairly
narrowly, at least in the cases I've tried to use it. Specifically it
requires the material to be grossly offensive and excludes 'ordinary'
incivility. In the world of Wikipedia, grossly offensive is a pretty
high bar it
It seems from my experience that WP:RD2 is usually interpreted fairly
narrowly, at least in the cases I've tried to use it. Specifically it
requires the material to be grossly offensive and excludes 'ordinary'
incivility. In the world of Wikipedia, grossly offensive is a pretty
high bar it
I changed the image of a uniform example in the gallery of [[Neckline]] to
one showing the V-neckline in use by both sexes (and without the confusing
additional undershirt neckline). Hope that's more balanced, representative
and clear.
Gillian
On 18 September 2011 06:28, Emily Monroe
13 matches
Mail list logo
