Hey everybody,
a friend of mine sent me a notice: the Wikipedia article Cumshot has a
picture which in my humble opinion is nothing else than pornography.
once again.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cumshot
I already tried to delete it from the German Wikipedia - but its being
restored
While the picture could be described as somewhat pornographic, I'll
have to agree with previous participants in this email conversation. This
article IS porn-related, so a pornographic cartoon can be used to
illustrate it, per WP:NOTCENSORED.
From,
Emily
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 2:27 PM, Carol
Perhaps the conversation should be more about equal representation of gender in
articles like this...
Just a thought :)
Sarah
Sent via iPhone - I apologize in advance for my shortness or errors! :)
On Apr 27, 2012, at 3:33 PM, Emily Monroe emilymonro...@gmail.com wrote:
While the picture
I could have a go again, Carol. :)
Gay porn is underrepresented in these articles.
Andreas
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 8:27 PM, Carol Moore DC carolmoor...@verizon.netwrote:
NO need to censor it. Just do a second one with bushier eyebrows and a
goatee and put that up instead :-)
On
I agree with what Beria says here. And I think it's a very important
distinction, especially when comparing to Sue's blog post. Sue's post was about
the article pregnancy -- not an article about pornography.
On a personal level, I happen to agree with you that there's lots of
pornographic
On 27 April 2012 20:54, Béria Lima beria.l...@wikimedia.pt wrote:
*Perhaps the conversation should be more about equal representation of
gender in articles like this...*
Should I ask what the appropriate equal representation in this case might
be? Female to male.ejaculation?
_
I
A Google image search for gay cumshot indicates there are 37.8 million
results. Cumshot -gay has 44 million. If these numbers are correct, then
gay and non-gay cumshots are almost equally common online, and it's a
toss-up (pun intended) as to which we should use.
There are really two separate
Hi Andreas
Some observations-
On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 2:02 AM, Andreas Kolbe jayen...@gmail.com wrote:
A Google image search for gay cumshot indicates there are 37.8 million
results. Cumshot -gay has 44 million. If these numbers are correct, then
gay and non-gay cumshots are almost equally
On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 5:56 AM, Thomas Morton morton.tho...@googlemail.com
wrote:
On 27 April 2012 20:54, Béria Lima beria.l...@wikimedia.pt wrote:
*Perhaps the conversation should be more about equal representation of
gender in articles like this...*
Should I ask what the appropriate
Fun fact: Female ejaculation is the most viewed Wikipedia article
related in any way to feminism (at least since WikiProject Feminism
started keeping stats). It's 3 times as popular as the next article on
the list, Abortion.
Ryan Kaldari
On 4/27/12 2:52 PM, Laura Hale wrote:
On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 12:16 AM, Ryan Kaldari rkald...@wikimedia.orgwrote:
**
Fun fact: Female ejaculation is the most viewed Wikipedia article related
in any way to feminism (at least since WikiProject Feminism started keeping
stats). It's 3 times as popular as the next article on the list,
On 4/27/2012 3:45 PM, Andreas Kolbe wrote:
I could have a go again, Carol. :)
Gay porn is underrepresented in these articles.
Andreas
So if I was too implicit in my statement. As Andreas surmised, I meant
re-do that photo to make it male on male. Or do a second one that's male
on male. Go
I'm not sure the technical term for it either, but the laymen's term is
female ejactulation. *shrugs*
From,
Emily
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 8:39 PM, Carol Moore DC carolmoor...@verizon.netwrote:
On 4/27/2012 3:45 PM, Andreas Kolbe wrote:
I could have a go again, Carol. :)
Gay porn is
13 matches
Mail list logo
