[Gendergap] How to measure the impact of Wikipedia on women's related coverage beyond Wikipedia

2012-05-15 Thread Laura Hale
Hi, I had a chance to chat with some one today who is involved in the public sector about the potential importance of Wikimedia related projects to developing dialog, resources related to, and having a larger societal impact on women as it pertains to women's related coverage on Wikimedia related

[Gendergap] Junko Tabei, and selected anniversaries on the front page

2012-05-15 Thread John Vandenberg
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Junko_Tabei scaled Mount Everest on 16 May 1975, but you wont see this anniversary, or any other female anniversary, on the front page of Wikipedia on 16 May (tomorrow). https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Selected_anniversaries/May_16 Here is why:

Re: [Gendergap] Article for deletion Fanny Imlay

2012-05-15 Thread Sarah Stierch
On 5/15/12 11:50 AM, Christine Meyer wrote: I thought that I'd bring an AfD discussion to the attention of this list: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Fanny_Imlay#Fanny_Imlay It really is ridiculous that this discussion is even happening, and is yet another example

Re: [Gendergap] Article for deletion Fanny Imlay

2012-05-15 Thread Carol Moore DC
On 5/15/2012 12:47 PM, Nathan wrote: It was a tactical deletion request. I find that to be a pretty silly maneuver, personally, particularly as the nominators never do a very good job as devil's advocate. If jbmurray didn't think the article should be deleted, he should not have wasted his own

Re: [Gendergap] Article for deletion Fanny Imlay

2012-05-15 Thread Ryan Kaldari
Too bad she wasn't nominated for any porn awards, then she would be clearly notable.[1] As it stands, she only has 1 biography and a couple hundred years of scholarly commentary, so it seems like a borderline case to me./sarcasm 1.

Re: [Gendergap] Article for deletion Fanny Imlay

2012-05-15 Thread Laura Hale
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 5:08 AM, Daniel and Elizabeth Case danc...@frontiernet.net wrote: This happened to another article I contributed to that reached FA status, as well: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:New_York_State_Route_32/Archive_1#Question It really came down to “yes, it’s

Re: [Gendergap] [Wiki-research-l] How to measure the impact of Wikipedia on women's related coverage beyond Wikipedia

2012-05-15 Thread En Pine
Search engine page ranks and click-through might be one way of measuring the social impact of Wikimedia, although Google’s ranking formula is secret and I don’t know if Wikimedia does click-through tracking. You might try asking Google or the Wikimedia technical folks for ways to measure

Re: [Gendergap] Article for deletion Fanny Imlay

2012-05-15 Thread Nathan
On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 3:32 PM, Laura Hale la...@fanhistory.com wrote: Been there. Done that. It isn't only women's topics. Because Justin Bieber is unpopular and actively disliked by some people, (Though I guess you could argue this example relates to a topic of interest to many young

Re: [Gendergap] Article for deletion Fanny Imlay

2012-05-15 Thread Lady of Shalott
I have to say that I think a topic such as Imlay, with literally centuries of scholarship is not really comparable to the recentism that is an article on a Twitter account, whether Bieber's or Gaga's. LadyofShalott/ Aleta Turner On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 3:50 PM, Nathan nawr...@gmail.com wrote:

Re: [Gendergap] Article for deletion Fanny Imlay

2012-05-15 Thread Laura Hale
From a gender gap perspective of bringing in new female contributors, I would argue that Justin Bieber and Lady Gaga are much more important than Imlay because Gaga and Bieber are of interest to and more accessible to a greater audience than Imlay's article is. I would further argue that it is a

Re: [Gendergap] The Dell Summit

2012-05-15 Thread Elaine Mao
Dell posted an apology on their Google+ page yesterday: https://plus.google.com/117161668189080869053/posts/5Zg5FdFEydi During a Dell-hosted customer and partner summit in Copenhagen in April, well-known public speaker and moderator, Mads Christensen, made a number of inappropriate and

Re: [Gendergap] Article for deletion Fanny Imlay

2012-05-15 Thread Sarah Stierch
On 5/15/12 6:35 PM, Laura Hale wrote: From a gender gap perspective of bringing in new female contributors, I would argue that Justin Bieber and Lady Gaga are much more important than Imlay because Gaga and Bieber are of interest to and more accessible to a greater audience than Imlay's

Re: [Gendergap] The Dell Summit

2012-05-15 Thread Sarah Stierch
Hi Elaine! Thanks for posting those updates. yeah, Google+ strange that they didn't post something on their website or release a statement in a more broader known format. Glad to see you out of your lurking! -Sarah On 5/15/12 6:50 PM, Elaine Mao wrote: Dell posted an apology on their

Re: [Gendergap] The Dell Summit

2012-05-15 Thread John Vandenberg
Welcome Elaine, and thanks for keeping this moving! The comments on that G+ are very informative. I'd love to see some reliable sources to back up that a) it was an attempt at humour

Re: [Gendergap] Article for deletion Fanny Imlay

2012-05-15 Thread John Vandenberg
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 9:01 AM, Sarah Stierch sarah.stie...@gmail.com wrote: On 5/15/12 6:35 PM, Laura Hale wrote: From a gender gap perspective of bringing in new female contributors,  I would argue that Justin Bieber and Lady Gaga are much more important than Imlay because Gaga and Bieber