On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 10:59 PM, David Goodman dgge...@gmail.com wrote:
The argument for Savage was that an exception should be made for
bibliographies, discographies, and so forth, where we would do better
to provide complete coverage since it quite easy to do something
which can well be
The argument for Savage was that an exception should be made for
bibliographies, discographies, and so forth, where we would do better
to provide complete coverage since it quite easy to do something
which can well be crowd-sourced, fits in with our basic mission, is
appropriate to do in
Been there. Done that. It isn't only women's topics. Because Justin
Bieber is unpopular and actively disliked by some people, (Though I guess
you could argue this example relates to a topic of interest to many young
girls) there was an attempt to merge
On 5/15/12 11:50 AM, Christine Meyer wrote:
I thought that I'd bring an AfD discussion to the attention of this
list:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Fanny_Imlay#Fanny_Imlay
It really is ridiculous that this discussion is even happening, and is
yet another example
On 5/15/2012 12:47 PM, Nathan wrote:
It was a tactical deletion request. I find that to be a pretty silly
maneuver, personally, particularly as the nominators never do a very
good job as devil's advocate. If jbmurray didn't think the article
should be deleted, he should not have wasted his own
Too bad she wasn't nominated for any porn awards, then she would be
clearly notable.[1] As it stands, she only has 1 biography and a couple
hundred years of scholarly commentary, so it seems like a borderline
case to me./sarcasm
1.
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 5:08 AM, Daniel and Elizabeth Case
danc...@frontiernet.net wrote:
This happened to another article I contributed to that reached FA status,
as well:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:New_York_State_Route_32/Archive_1#Question
It really came down to “yes, it’s
On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 3:32 PM, Laura Hale la...@fanhistory.com wrote:
Been there. Done that. It isn't only women's topics. Because Justin
Bieber is unpopular and actively disliked by some people, (Though I guess
you could argue this example relates to a topic of interest to many young
I have to say that I think a topic such as Imlay, with literally centuries
of scholarship is not really comparable to the recentism that is an article
on a Twitter account, whether Bieber's or Gaga's.
LadyofShalott/ Aleta Turner
On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 3:50 PM, Nathan nawr...@gmail.com wrote:
From a gender gap perspective of bringing in new female contributors, I
would argue that Justin Bieber and Lady Gaga are much more important than
Imlay because Gaga and Bieber are of interest to and more accessible to a
greater audience than Imlay's article is. I would further argue that it is
a
On 5/15/12 6:35 PM, Laura Hale wrote:
From a gender gap perspective of bringing in new female contributors,
I would argue that Justin Bieber and Lady Gaga are much more
important than Imlay because Gaga and Bieber are of interest to and
more accessible to a greater audience than Imlay's
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 9:01 AM, Sarah Stierch sarah.stie...@gmail.com wrote:
On 5/15/12 6:35 PM, Laura Hale wrote:
From a gender gap perspective of bringing in new female contributors, I
would argue that Justin Bieber and Lady Gaga are much more important than
Imlay because Gaga and Bieber
12 matches
Mail list logo
