On 14/09/2011 16:56, Sarah wrote:
So the problem with the basic consent template as written -- I
personally created this media. All identifiable persons shown
specifically consented to this photograph or video -- is that it
implies to the unsuspecting that consent has been given to take the
On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 09:25, Arnaud HERVE arnaudhe...@x-mail.net wrote:
On 14/09/2011 16:56, Sarah wrote:
So the problem with the basic consent template as written -- I
personally created this media. All identifiable persons shown
specifically consented to this photograph or video -- is that
On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 4:16 PM, Ryan Kaldari rkald...@wikimedia.orgwrote:
On 9/13/11 8:03 PM, Sarah Stierch wrote:
I think this is really great, thank you Kaldari for taking the time to
create this.
The n00b in me asks :
1) Is this trackable? That is, a hidden category or anything?
That looks good, Ryan. Would it make sense to add something about the
release of the image? For example,
I personally created this media. All identifiable persons shown
specifically consented to this photograph or video being taken and
released under a free licence.
Sarah
On Tue, Sep 13, 2011
I agree. As you wrote this email, I was altering it to include the phrase
consent to publish. Your wording is better, I'll change to that.
Toby/99of9
On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 8:28 AM, Sarah slimvir...@gmail.com wrote:
That looks good, Ryan. Would it make sense to add something about the
On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 7:39 PM, Ryan Kaldari rkald...@wikimedia.org wrote:
I added a new parameter to the template for indicating full consent. If
you use {{consent|full}} it outputs:
I personally created this media. All identifiable persons shown
specifically consented to publication of this
I'm both a long-time admin on Commons and an OTRS volunteer. I've been
wanting to chime in on this thread, but haven't really had the time. I'm
worried though that I'm about to see history repeat itself, so I want to
quickly share a few thoughts...
First, the issue of consent on Commons has
--- On Mon, 12/9/11, Ryan Kaldari rkald...@wikimedia.org wrote:
First, the issue of consent on Commons has been passionately debates for
years, and has a long and tortured history. Before proposing anything,
please make yourself familiar with the previous discussions and their
outcomes. Most
Here's something we might do though. Addition of any image which violates
anyone's privacy to any article can be suppressed on the English
Wikipedia. Using this policy: Removal of non-public personal
information, such as phone numbers, home addresses, workplaces or
identities of pseudonymous or
On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 7:00 PM, Fred Bauder fredb...@fairpoint.net wrote:
Here's something we might do though. Addition of any image which violates
anyone's privacy to any article can be suppressed on the English
Wikipedia. Using this policy: Removal of non-public personal
information, such
As soon as I have some free time, I'll whip up such a template and throw
it into the water. It'll be interesting to see how it is received.
Ryan Kaldari
Ok, sounds like a plan. I'll make a noise in the east; you strike in the
west...
Fred
___
Hi Ryan,
A draft template was actually made to augment the mostly recently voted
[[COM:SEX]] proposal:
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Template:Consent
The proposal closed with no consensus*, but with a few modifications, the
template could still be put to good use.
Toby / 99of9
*Mainly
12 matches
Mail list logo
