I don't know how else to say in that I thought these were emails -- not for
publication and therefore googleable. I want my comments removed. The
link to which I was sent to remove items is not a working link. I'm very
frustrated and upset that this has happened. THIS WILL HAVE A DELETERIOUS
Unfortunately the list is public (there is a link to public archives
on the subscription page), and posts to it are collected by several
services that are unrelated to Wikimedia. Since the posts are stored
by private third parties, there is no good method for removing them.
You can try inquiring
Hi Migdia,
When you signed up for this mailing list, you signed up for it on
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap which states To
see the collection of prior postings to the list, visit the Gendergap
Archives and links to the archived posts. I'm sorry you didn't see before
Is there no way to undo this, Nathan? Sarah? I will readily admit that
I DID NOT understand that posts to this list were public posts, and my
participation would have been shaped by such an awareness.
On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 8:28 AM, Nathan wrote:
Unfortunately the list is public (there is a
(Accidentally replied privately due to being cc'd on the email he sent!
This was meant for on-list)
Hi Mike,
As I just sent out re:Migdia, it states on the sign up page for the list
To see the collection of prior postings to the list, visit the Gendergap
Archives
I do sympathize with Migdia and, particularly as a new participant in WMF
projects, it probably did not occur to her that communication related to
most aspects of most projects is public by default.
At the same time, it does seem to be clear that there was public access to
archives at least.
If
on 11/9/11 3:03 PM, Risker at risker...@gmail.com wrote:
I do sympathize with Migdia and, particularly as a new participant in WMF
projects, it probably did not occur to her that communication related to
most aspects of most projects is public by default.
At the same time, it does seem to be
Along this line, Risker, which form of posting is preferred in the Lists;
posting below the person you are responding to (as I am doing here); or
posting above it? I've seen it done both ways.
Marc
Marc,
This could get fun -- more virtual ink has been spilled on the top-post
vs.
on 11/9/11 3:32 PM, Pete Forsyth at petefors...@gmail.com wrote:
Along this line, Risker, which form of posting is preferred in the Lists;
posting below the person you are responding to (as I am doing here); or
posting above it? I've seen it done both ways.
Marc
Marc,
This could get fun --
