[Gendergap] Another list, another opportunity to make sure we have articles on everyone

http://cinema-fanatic.com/2015/08/22/a-year-with-women-103-essential-films-by-female-filmmakers/ ___ Gendergap mailing list Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org To manage your subscription preferences, including unsubscribing, please visit:

Re: [Gendergap] Signpost op-ed (NSFW)

Context is everything. If a male editor who was previously contemptuous of women and the idea of addressing the gender gap writes a column supposedly celebrating women scientists with the same tone, that tone would be widely perceived as mockery and not celebration, and that perception would

Re: [Gendergap] Signpost op-ed (NSFW)

A number of us who are concerned about civility on Wikipedia do not see swearing in and of itself as uncivil. Many people may include professionalism and decorum under the umbrella of civility, but others do not, and they are not hypocritical because they do not. The problem is not the words

Re: [Gendergap] Lists of notable deaths of 2015

"there seems to be no process to systematically incorporate these, even when they provide strong support for notability." In fact, there's a lot of discouragement when you try to incorporate people from notable obits into the Deaths in 20xx articles: redlinks removed, stubs targeted for deletion.

Re: [Gendergap] Signpost op-ed (NSFW)

On Sun, Feb 21, 2016 at 10:39 AM, Risker wrote: > Is it a double standard? If that page hadn't been written by Keilana, > would it have been published as is? > I'm curious what you mean by this exactly. Do you mean you think I published it because I know Emily personally

Re: [Gendergap] 2 Rachel Feinsteins confused

I think I fixed most of the links. On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 8:23 PM, Carol Moore dc wrote: > Oh, duh, FYI, I'm banned from editing or I'd do it myself. > If anyone needs a quicky project to end confusion on wikipedia on which > woman is which. > > Thus the "thanks" :-)

Re: [Gendergap] 2 Rachel Feinsteins confused

ntions_%28people%29#Disambiguating >> >> On Fri, Mar 4, 2016 at 12:27 AM, Carol Moore dc >> <carolmoor...@verizon.net <mailto:carolmoor...@verizon.net>> wrote: >> >> THANKS!! CM >> >> >> On 3/3/2016 8:56 PM, Robert Fernandez

Re: [Gendergap] Katherine Maher speech at MozFest 2016

The WikiConference North America keynote was recorded by C-SPAN and I've been told it may air in December, possibly. I had hoped to get links to all publicly available video of the conference on our website by now, but hopefully by the end of the year I'll be able to get that done. If people are

Re: [Gendergap] "Is Wikipedia Woke?"

Some of the editors were identified by names which did not appear on their name tags, and at least one was not identified by name in the caption, only by user name. That appears to indicate that the photographer sought individual information and permission. I'll ping some of the NYC folks who

Re: [Gendergap] FYI - GGTF case appeal

No, that's exactly the opposite of what was said. I did not say I signed a non-disparagement agreement. I said I signed the standard WMF confidentiality agreement. You can read it here: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Confidentiality_ agreement_for_nonpublic_information/ Everyone signs it for

Re: [Gendergap] FYI - GGTF case appeal

When you say professionals, in what specific capacity are they being recruited? Who is requiring them to sign an NDA? The Foundation? Their employers? I've worked with a number of Wikipedians in Residence and professionals at US cultural institutions, and I know some of them well enough to