[CANCELLED][VOTE] Release Apache MXNet (incubating) version 1.4.0.rc2

2019-02-10 Thread Steffen Rochel
Dear community - I'm cancelling the vote due to -1 feedback from Luciano due to RAT failures. For details see https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/51e9ab05edae2089c74a253000a92d5aa5c6406f54e5bd0a0b3c3879@%3Cgeneral.incubator.apache.org%3E The MXNet community will discuss next steps. Regards,

[VOTE]: Release Apache Dubbo Spring Boot Project (Incubating) 2.7.0

2019-02-10 Thread Mercy
Hello all, This is a call for the vote to release Apache Dubbo Spring Boot Project (Incubating) version 2.7.0 The Apache Dubbo community has voted on and approved a proposal to release Apache Dubbo Spring Boot Project (Incubating) 2.7.0. We now kindly request the Incubator PMC members review

Re: Podlings not following ASF release policy

2019-02-10 Thread Kenneth Knowles
[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-438 :-) Kenn On Sun, Feb 10, 2019 at 1:06 PM Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > > It sounds like httpd has the same problem since some of these listed > > “releases” are failed vote attempts (and so not official releases) > > Yep it is and to try

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache MXNet (incubating) version 1.4.0.rc2

2019-02-10 Thread Luciano Resende
I ran RAT, and while I understand that a lot of the failures are coming from the 3rdparty directory, some of those are from files that should have the ASF license header such as pom files, docker files, project documentation (yes, MD files do accept apache license headers), Maybe the rat-exclude

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache MXNet (incubating) version 1.4.0.rc2

2019-02-10 Thread Kellen Sunderland
I believe that's correct. I should have mentioned it was non-binding to avoid confusion. On Sun, Feb 10, 2019 at 7:05 PM Steffen Rochel wrote: > Thanks to Henri, Jason and Kellen for your feedback. > We currently have *two, binding +1 votes* (Henri, Jason) from Incubator PMC > members, so

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache MXNet (incubating) version 1.4.0.rc2

2019-02-10 Thread Steffen Rochel
Thanks to Henri, Jason and Kellen for your feedback. We currently have *two, binding +1 votes* (Henri, Jason) from Incubator PMC members, so *still don't meet the incubator release voting criteria *. I'm asking support from Incubator PMC

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache MXNet (incubating) version 1.4.0.rc2

2019-02-10 Thread Jason Dai
+1 On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 9:15 AM kellen sunderland < kellen.sunderl...@gmail.com> wrote: > +1 > > On Sun, Feb 10, 2019 at 3:39 PM Hen wrote: > > > +1. > > > > On Wed, Feb 6, 2019 at 1:59 PM Steffen Rochel > > wrote: > > > > > Dear community, > > > > > > This is a call for releasing Apache

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache MXNet (incubating) version 1.4.0.rc2

2019-02-10 Thread kellen sunderland
+1 On Sun, Feb 10, 2019 at 3:39 PM Hen wrote: > +1. > > On Wed, Feb 6, 2019 at 1:59 PM Steffen Rochel > wrote: > > > Dear community, > > > > This is a call for releasing Apache MXNet (incubating) 1.4.0, release > > candidate 2 > > > > Apache MXNet (incubating) community has voted and approved

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache MXNet (incubating) version 1.4.0.rc2

2019-02-10 Thread Hen
+1. On Wed, Feb 6, 2019 at 1:59 PM Steffen Rochel wrote: > Dear community, > > This is a call for releasing Apache MXNet (incubating) 1.4.0, release > candidate 2 > > Apache MXNet (incubating) community has voted and approved the release. > > Vote thread: > > >

Re: Podlings not following ASF release policy

2019-02-10 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, > It sounds like httpd has the same problem since some of these listed > “releases” are failed vote attempts (and so not official releases) Yep it is and to try and sort it out I’ve raised a ticket with legal. [1] Until that is resolved just carry on the best you can. > What are our

Re: Podlings not following ASF release policy

2019-02-10 Thread Felix Cheung
... so I think we need to provide an option here. No question that any unauthorized release is not allowed. But what about while voting for a release? It sounds like httpd has the same problem since some of these listed “releases” are failed vote attempts (and so not official releases) >From a

Re: Mentor sign-off due next Tuesday (February 12th)

2019-02-10 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, We’re currently missing sign-off of Tamaya. Also a number off projects only have one sign-off, the board likes to see more than one so Mentors who not signed off the reports yet it would be great to see you do that. Thanks, Justin

Re: [VOTE] Shut down unused/inactive incubator lists

2019-02-10 Thread sebb
Done On Sun, 10 Feb 2019 at 18:34, sebb wrote: > > Raised https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-17831 > > On Sat, 26 Jan 2019 at 07:21, Xin Wang wrote: > > > > +1 > > > > 在 2019年1月26日星期六,Jun Liu 写道: > > > > > +1 > > > > > > Jun > > > > > > > On Jan 21, 2019, at 8:11 AM, sebb wrote: > >

Re: [VOTE] Shut down unused/inactive incubator lists

2019-02-10 Thread sebb
Raised https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-17831 On Sat, 26 Jan 2019 at 07:21, Xin Wang wrote: > > +1 > > 在 2019年1月26日星期六,Jun Liu 写道: > > > +1 > > > > Jun > > > > > On Jan 21, 2019, at 8:11 AM, sebb wrote: > > > > > > The following lists are all but inactive: > > > > > > announce@ Last

Re: Renaming repos and security concerns

2019-02-10 Thread Craig Russell
Hi Justin, > On Feb 9, 2019, at 8:16 PM, Justin Mclean wrote: > > Hi, > >> As I mentioned else-thread, I think the date should be the date the >> repository is moved to the Incubator, not the date the project is voted into >> the incubator. > > This seams reasonable but that not what has