Dropping private list for previously mentioned reason.
In order for us to accept the Takari Maven Plugin, it's currently EPL v1.
We allow these to be distributed in binary form. For us to accept the
plugin, I would expect an SGA from Takari allowing the relicensing.
The Maven Wrapper i think is
On 6-1-2020 22:24:09, Justin Mclean wrote:
HI,
Confirmed IP Clearance from all active committers:
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/7c8fc7fa0fc677c24504d948d7d71e6cdebdb952c9ca0a2183460726%40%3Cprivate.maven.apache.org%3E
On 6-1-2020 22:14:39, Justin Mclean wrote:
Hi,
Can you add the information the IP clearance form please, currently it is
incomplete.
Distribution rights:
https://github.com/takari/maven-wrapper/blob/master/LICENSE.txt
[https://github.com/takari/maven-wrapper/blob/master/LICENSE.txt]
HI,
> Confirmed IP Clearance from all active committers:
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/7c8fc7fa0fc677c24504d948d7d71e6cdebdb952c9ca0a2183460726%40%3Cprivate.maven.apache.org%3E
>
Hi Craig,
In answer to your question:
*If Apache does incubate and graduate Yunikorn as a top level project, we
would require Cloudera to commit to recognize Yunikorn as an Apache project
in all of its materials. Otherwise, there would be confusion in the market
about whether Yunikorn was an
Hi,
Dropping private@ have a mix of public and private lists can cause issues.
> And vote of acceptance
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/97054be79cede23c792c1db91f0fd73129ce969fea26bd12a1bf38f5%40%3Cprivate.maven.apache.org%3E
It seems a little odd this was done on the private list. While
Hi,
Can you add the information the IP clearance form please, currently it is
incomplete.
> Distribution rights:
> https://github.com/takari/maven-wrapper/blob/master/LICENSE.txt
> https://github.com/takari/takari-maven-plugin/blob/master/LICENSE.txt
While the ASF license allows this, we
And vote of acceptance
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/97054be79cede23c792c1db91f0fd73129ce969fea26bd12a1bf38f5%40%3Cprivate.maven.apache.org%3E
On 6-1-2020 22:06:52, Robert Scholte wrote:
Distribution rights:
https://github.com/takari/maven-wrapper/blob/master/LICENSE.txt
Distribution rights:
https://github.com/takari/maven-wrapper/blob/master/LICENSE.txt
https://github.com/takari/takari-maven-plugin/blob/master/LICENSE.txt
Confirmed IP Clearance from all active committers:
Hi,
I don’t see that distribution rights have been confirmed. i.e Has takari (see
takari.io) given permission to do this? I assume that takari is the owner of
the code? If not does it belong to all of the contributors? If that’s the case
have they aggreed to this?
Thanks,.
Justin
On 06.01.20 21:11, Robert Scholte wrote:
Apache Maven received a code donation for the Maven Wrapper
http://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/maven-wrapper.html
All sources are under Apache License 2.
Most likely most of the maven-wrapper code and some parts of the
takari-maven-plugin will
Apache Maven received a code donation for the Maven Wrapper
http://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/maven-wrapper.html
All sources are under Apache License 2.
Most likely most of the maven-wrapper code and some parts of the
takari-maven-plugin will end up in Maven (core), so there will
no
Hi all,
The Apache Daffodil community has voted and approved the proposed
release of Apache Daffodil (incubating) 2.5.0-rc2.
We now kindly request the Incubator PMC members review and vote on this
incubator release.
Daffodil is an open source implementation of the DFDL specification that
uses
+ @Casey to answer the question since Casey may not
subscribe to incubator emails.
Thanks
On Sat, Dec 21, 2019 at 7:01 PM Craig Russell wrote:
> Hi Casey,
>
> > On Dec 20, 2019, at 10:31 AM, Casey wrote:
> >
> > Hi Folks,
> >
> > Cloudera does not have a trademark on YuniKorn; we do use the
+1（binding）
I checked
Download links are valid, git tag is OK.
The kits have incubating in the name.
Checksums and PGP signatures are valid.
DISCLAIMER is included.
LICENSE and NOTICE files are good.
There is a incubating in the kits name.
No binary file in the source kit.
I can build the kits
Hi Luciano,
I've fixed the license version manually, they'll be solved in next RC cut.
But still I cannot find out the license for ldapsdk 4.1, this is a very old
library, I doubt there's no license existed. Would you please help to check
it? Thanks!
And regarding to bootstrap and them files,
16 matches
Mail list logo
