Re: [VOTE] Accept XTable into the ASF Incubator

+1 (binding) Best of luck! On Fri, Dec 15, 2023, 6:18 PM Jesus Camacho Rodriguez wrote: > Hi All, > > Following the discussion in the incubator mailing list [1], I am starting > this official vote for the XTable project. > > Here is the proposal - >

Re: [DISCUSS] OneTable proposal

I appreciate the name update. That addresses my concern there. Thanks for the quick update! If only all namings I've been involved in were that quick :) On Wed, Dec 13, 2023, 11:49 AM Jesus Camacho Rodriguez wrote: > The package would be xtable. > As for the pronunciation, I was pronouncing it

Re: [DISCUSS] OneTable proposal

AM Jacques Nadeau wrote: > I've shared this feedback with Jesus prior to the proposal but would like > to do here as well. This project is trying to make multiple open source > projects work together. It would be nice to see representation from > multiple of those communities. I fe

Re: [DISCUSS] OneTable proposal

I've shared this feedback with Jesus prior to the proposal but would like to do here as well. This project is trying to make multiple open source projects work together. It would be nice to see representation from multiple of those communities. I feel that true success of this project is heavily

Re: [VOTE] Recommend Apache Iceberg graduation to top-level project resolution to the board

+1 (binding). Congrats On Sat, May 16, 2020 at 2:27 PM Dave Fisher wrote: > +1 (binding) > > Best Regards, > Dave > > > On May 15, 2020, at 5:39 PM, Ryan Blue wrote: > > > > Hi everyone, > > > > With the support of our mentors (as well as helpful ASF members), the > > Apache Iceberg community

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Iceberg 0.7.0-incubating RC4

+1 (binding) Downloaded, reviewed licenses. Spot check for bad licenses. Built from source + tests. Nice job on the first release guys! On Tue, Oct 22, 2019 at 4:05 PM James Taylor wrote: > +1 (binding). > > Successfully downloaded, verified license, verified checksum, verified > signature,

Re: [IP CLEARANCE] Arrow Gandiva library

+1 On Tue, Sep 25, 2018, 3:00 PM Wes McKinney wrote: > hi folks, > > I missed that the software grant for this had not yet been filed with > the ASF secretary, but this is done now. I have updated the IP > Clearance document and will leave this vote open for another 72 hours > from now. > >

Edit Access to Wiki

I just realized that I've either lost my account (or never had one) for editing the Wiki. Can I get edit access? Username: jacquesnadeau thanks! Jacques

Re: [VOTE] Heron to enter Apache Incubator

> * Maosong Fu (maosongfu at gmail dot com) > * Neng Lu(freeneng at gmail dot com) > * Runhang Li (obj dot runhang at gmail dot com) > * Sanjeev Kulkarni (sanjeevrk at gmail dot com) > * Supun Kamburugamuve (supun at apache dot org)* > * Thomas Sun (tom dot ssf at gmail dot co

Re: [VOTE] Superset Proposal for Apache Incubator

+1 binding On Apr 27, 2017 1:35 PM, "Jitendra Pandey" wrote: > Re-affirming. +1 (binding) > > On 4/27/17, 1:24 PM, "Ashutosh Chauhan" > wrote: > > Re-affirming my vote as well: > > +1 (binding) > > On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 10:45

Re: [VOTE] Bring Griffin to Apache Incubator

+1 (binding) On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 8:47 AM, Andrew Purtell wrote: > +1 (binding) > > > On Dec 1, 2016, at 8:35 AM, Felix Cheung wrote: > > > > +1 > > > > On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 10:40 PM Henry Saputra > > wrote: > > >

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Apache CarbonData 0.2.0-incubating release

I didn't see the last +1 so I reviewed and also gave you a +1. Guess that is not needed now :P On Sat, Nov 19, 2016 at 5:33 AM, Liang Chen wrote: > Hi > > Finally, this vote passed with the following result: > > +1 (binding) : John D. Ament,Henry Saputra,Uma

Re: [VOTE] Apache CarbonData 0.2.0-incubating release

Built, ran tests, checked signatures. Agree that next build shouldn't pass without clarification on build instructions. For this build: +1 (binding) On Sat, Nov 19, 2016 at 5:33 AM, Liang Chen wrote: > Hi > > Thanks John. > Definitely, we would provide the more

Re: [VOTE] Accept CarbonData into the Apache Incubator

+1 (binding) On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 4:04 PM, John D. Ament wrote: > +1 > > On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 4:41 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré > wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > following the discussion thread, I'm now calling a vote to accept > > CarbonData into the

Re: [VOTE] Accept Airflow into the Incubator

+1 (binding) On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 5:57 AM, Jeremiah Lowin wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > Jeremiah > > > > On Mar 25, 2016, at 8:26 AM, Suresh Marru wrote: > > > > + 1 (binding). > > > > Suresh > > > >> On Mar 24, 2016, at 11:00 PM, Siddharth Anand

Re: [VOTE] Accept Mnemonic into the Apache Incubator

+1 (binding) thanks, Jacques On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 9:37 AM, Patrick Hunt wrote: > Hi folks, > > OK the discussion is now completed. Please VOTE to accept Mnemonic > into the Apache Incubator. I’ll leave the VOTE open for at least > the next 72 hours, with hopes to close it

Re: [DISCUSS] Mnemonic incubator proposal

Hey YanPing, This addition is nice to see. I agree that there is great opportunity for the Arrow and Mnemonic communities to collaborate. I look forward to working together. Jacques On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 3:01 PM, Wang, Yanping wrote: > Hi, All > > Based on feedback,

Re: FW: [DISCUSSION] How to deal with runtime dependencies

I've used this as reference previously: http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#prohibited Specifically this sentence: "...For example, using a GPL'ed tool during the build is OK." That would suggest that using GPL tools for build and test should be okay. I'll let others address the

Re: [VOTE] Accept Guacamole into the Apache incubator

+1 binding - Jacques Nadeau On Feb 2, 2016 8:11 PM, "Greg Trasuk" <tras...@stratuscom.com> wrote: > > +1 (Binding) - Greg Trasuk > > > > On Feb 2, 2016, at 10:05 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net> > wrote: > > > > Hi, > >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Myriad 0.1.0 (incubating)

I tried to build and got this message: $ brew install gradle ==> Downloading https://downloads.gradle.org/distributions/gradle-2.8-bin.zip 100.0%  /usr/local/Cellar/gradle/2.8: 164 files, 47M, built in 6 seconds $ gradle

Re: [VOTE] Accept Metron into Apache Incubator

+1 (binding) Jacques On Fri, Dec 4, 2015 at 8:10 AM, Amol Kekre wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > Amol > > > On Fri, Dec 4, 2015 at 8:02 AM, Ryan Merriman > wrote: > > > +1 (non-binding) > > > > > > On 12/4/15, 10:00 AM, "james sirota"

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Accept Impala into the Apache Incubator

A few thoughts from a 'bystander': It's great that Greg and the others who disagree cast their dissenting votes. That doesn't mean that we should throw out process. If the process is 3x+1 and more +1 than -1, this vote passes as Henry stated. Greg even stated (if I understand his statements

Re: [VOTE] Accept Kudu into the Apache Incubator

+1 Great to see this coming to the foundation! On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 11:33 AM, Todd Lipcon wrote: > On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 11:32 AM, Todd Lipcon wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > Discussion on the [DISCUSS] thread seems to have wound down, so I'd like > > to

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Six new Incubator PMC members

> * Phil Sorber (sorber), PMC member for TrafficServer. > > * Julien Le Dem (julien), PMC Chair of Parquet, PMC member of Pig and > Tez. > > * Jacques Nadeau (jacques), PMC Chair of Drill, PMC member of Calcite. > > > > Welcome aboa

Request to join IPMC

I would like to join the IPMC. I'm PMC Chair of Drill, a PMC member for Calcite and have also contributed to Parquet & HBase. Let me know what you need. thanks, Jacques

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Calcite from the Apache Incubator

+1 (non-binding). Props go especially to Julian for all that he has done to establish the community. On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 10:14 PM, Steven Noels wrote: > On Tue, Sep 15, 2015, at 03:56 AM, Julian Hyde wrote: > > > This is a vote for Calcite to become a top-level project.

[RESULT][VOTE] Release apache-calcite-1.4.0-incubating

ing my +1 from Calcite list. > > Ashutosh > > On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 10:59 AM, Alan Gates <alanfga...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Forwarding my +1 from the Calcite vote. >> >> Alan. >> >> Jacques Nadeau <jacq...@apache.org> >> August 28, 2015 a

Re: [VOTE] Release apache-calcite-1.4.0-incubating

Hi Justin, I've filed CALCITE-860 and CALCITE-861 to address the issues you identified. We'll be sure to get them addressed for the next release. Thanks for reviewing the release and voting. Jacques On Sat, Aug 29, 2015 at 5:07 PM, Justin Mclean jus...@classsoftware.com wrote: Hi, +0

[VOTE] Release apache-calcite-1.4.0-incubating

the release. The vote is open for 72 hours, or until the necessary number of votes (3 +1) is reached. [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Calcite 1.4.0-incubating [ ] -1 Do not release this package because... Jacques Nadeau, on behalf of Apache Calcite PPMC

Re: [VOTE] Release apache-calcite-1.4.0-incubating

Thanks for helping clarify Marvin. I didn't realize that Julian was an IPMC. I was only counting the two mentors that voted in our vote. On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 2:45 PM, Marvin Humphrey mar...@rectangular.com wrote: On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 2:32 PM, Jacques Nadeau jacq...@apache.org wrote

Re: [VOTE] Apache Drill 0.6.0-incubating release

This vote thread looks like a hanging chad. The current vote count is: +1 Ted +1 Lars +1 Justin +1 or -1: Grant -0 Jan I would love to have a clarification vote from Grant. I read his concern and the subsequent messages to mean +1 but I'm a bit biased as I'd like to see this release go out.

[ANNOUNCE] Announcing the release of Apache Drill 0.5.0-incubating

Hello Everybody, I'm pleased to announce the 0.5.0 release of Apache Drill. It includes a huge amount of work from everyone in the community. You can read more about it on our blog [1] or check out the release notes [2]. Download it now [3] and let us know what you think! [1]

[RESULT] [VOTE] Apache Drill 0.5.0-incubating release

documented somewhere? On Mon, Sep 8, 2014 at 3:17 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote: On 7 September 2014 20:31, Jacques Nadeau jacq...@apache.org wrote: As I understand the release guidelines, one is not allowed to put something on dist.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Apache Drill 0.5.0-incubating release

match the release version (0.5.0.rc2 vs 0.5.0) John On Sat, Sep 6, 2014 at 11:36 PM, Jacques Nadeau jacq...@apache.org wrote: It is my pleasure to present the Apache Drill 0.5.0-incubating release to the general incubator list for a vote. This set of artifacts have passed our drill

Re: [VOTE] Apache Drill 0.5.0-incubating release

in the proper place (e.g. https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/ ) If this gets moved, I can vote +1 On Sun, Sep 7, 2014 at 11:29 AM, Jacques Nadeau jacq...@apache.org wrote: Hi John, Thanks for the feedback. I'd like to respond to each of your concerns: Your NOTICE file

Re: [VOTE] Apache Drill 0.5.0-incubating release

#host-rc On Sun, Sep 7, 2014 at 12:48 PM, John D. Ament john.d.am...@gmail.com wrote: On Sun, Sep 7, 2014 at 3:39 PM, jan i j...@apache.org wrote: On 7 September 2014 21:31, Jacques Nadeau jacq...@apache.org wrote: As I understand the release guidelines, one is not allowed to put

[VOTE] Apache Drill 0.5.0-incubating release

It is my pleasure to present the Apache Drill 0.5.0-incubating release to the general incubator list for a vote. This set of artifacts have passed our drill-dev vote and incorporate a number of improvements with over 100 JIRAs closed in the last month. As part of this release, we looked to

Re: [VOTE] Apache Drill 0.4.0-incubating release

Hey guys, Sorry I didn't see Henry and Justin's comments until just now. Per Justin's primary concerns about the License stuff: I think we've just made mistakes in the notice and license files as to exactly how we reference things. All the category B licenses are mvn binary dependencies (per

Re: [VOTE] Apache Drill 0.4.0-incubating release

on our next attempt. Justin, would you be willing to review these changes once we get them up so that we can make sure we're not making other foolish mistakes? thanks, Jacques On Fri, Aug 8, 2014 at 8:18 AM, Jacques Nadeau jacq...@apache.org wrote: Hey guys, Sorry I didn't see Henry

[RESULT][VOTE] Apache Drill 0.4.0-incubating release

, 2014 at 3:44 PM, Jacques Nadeau jacq...@apache.org wrote: Hey Ted, Those SNAPSHOT dependencies are a bit misleading. Because Drill is so closely coupled to the Optiq and Parquet codebase, we need to generate separate artifacts. As part of doing monthly releases, it is unfeasible

Re: [VOTE] Apache Drill 0.4.0-incubating release

. On Mon, Aug 4, 2014 at 8:07 AM, Jacques Nadeau jacq...@apache.org wrote: We've held a vote on drill-dev to release the 0.4.0-incubating release of Apache Drill. The vote thread can be found here: http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-drill-dev/201407.mbox/%3CCAKa9qD

[VOTE] Apache Drill 0.4.0-incubating release

We've held a vote on drill-dev to release the 0.4.0-incubating release of Apache Drill. The vote thread can be found here: http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-drill-dev/201407.mbox/%3CCAKa9qD%3DKQURAMcS3RQJbUABSU4%3DDEGSewK2s4MAAidu4c%3DOjBg%40mail.gmail.com%3E The vote passed