e with numerous implementation errors
> inherent to its architecture seems like going backwards.
>
> —
> Matt Sicker
>
> > On Jan 8, 2022, at 13:45, Rohit Yadav wrote:
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I agree and extend support for Andrew's remarks. Apache C
for volunteering and supporting
1.x maintenance.
Regards,
Rohit Yadav
PMC, Apache CloudStack
On 2021/12/21 21:54:34 Andrew Purtell wrote:
> > as for the v1 :: COBOL analogy, that’s not a bad comparison. Basically,
> users who haven’t bothered to upgrade in 10 years will have to end up
concerns. I am not a member of the IPMC, just an interested
> participant in the conversation.
>
> On 7/11/21, 11:25 PM, "Rohit Yadav" wrote:
>
> Hi Daniel, Justin, IPMC,
>
> Are you happy with the answers to satisfaction? Do you have any other
>
. If there
are any, can you advise by the end of tomorrow?
Regards.
On Sat, Jul 10, 2021 at 10:56 AM Rohit Yadav wrote:
>
> Hi Justin,
>
> Yes that's right, there's no 3rd party code in the latest codebase/tags that
> is being donated. And yes, the large commits that brought the
Hi Justin,
Yes that's right, there's no 3rd party code in the latest codebase/tags
that is being donated. And yes, the large commits that brought the 3rd
party code in vendor directory have been all removed too.
Regards.
On Sat, 10 Jul, 2021, 6:26 am Justin Mclean,
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > However,
Hi Justin,
Please see Daniel's email on the commits that introduce the vendor
related codebase. Sharing the links of the two commits from Daniel's
email:
https://github.com/xanzy/terraform-provider-cloudstack/commit/07febb7a6ba78e27224b37ad41e23bc4634b18b4
ards.
On Fri, Jul 9, 2021 at 1:17 PM Paul Angus wrote:
>
>
> @Rohit Yadav can you ensure that Daniel is happy that his questions have
> been answered so that we can continue
> + you need to cc me specifically if you need my attention.
>
>
> Kind regards
>
> Paul A
committed and updated the IP clearance XML today
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/public/trunk/content/ip-clearance/cloudstack-terraform.xml
which must be checked by whoever starts the vote on general@incubator.
Thanks and regards.
On Tue, Jul 6, 2021 at 12:33 PM Rohit Yadav wrote:
>
>
5, 2021 at 12:17 PM Rohit Yadav wrote:
> All,
>
> We've completed most of the actions [1][2] per the IP clearance process
> [1] and the initiative is tracked by a Github issue [2]. The ICLA and
> software grants by the codebase/repo owner Sander van Harmelen has been
> a
/issues/5159
Regards.
On Fri, Jun 25, 2021 at 1:44 PM Rohit Yadav wrote:
> All,
>
> Just a short update, I think we've reached out to all the contributors via
> this Github issue which is also tracking the IP clearance process:
> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/issues/5159
>
All,
Just a short update, I think we've reached out to all the contributors via
this Github issue which is also tracking the IP clearance process:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/issues/5159
As per
https://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/ip-clearance-template.html#process
I think we
Alright, I'll create a Github issue as suggested in the example to track IP
clearance with list of all people and will try to reach out to all
contributors within a limited time period and see if they can agree over
the other legal thread and submit their ICLAs. I'm not subscribed to the
legal or
gt;
> Sander
>
> On 23 Jun 2021, at 07:30, Rohit Yadav wrote:
>
>
> My understanding is the plugin was originally started as a repo or work by
> Sander (
> https://github.com/xanzy/terraform-provider-cloudstack/commits/master?after=5e7ccfea50810303a6b205084fb6f0b3ea
My understanding is the plugin was originally started as a repo or work by
Sander (
https://github.com/xanzy/terraform-provider-cloudstack/commits/master?after=5e7ccfea50810303a6b205084fb6f0b3eade33ca+314=master)
who contributed it to the Hashicorp Github org like many other community
providers
Justin why do we need Hashicorp? They are not involved or are the owner of
the codebase/repos.
Regards.
On Wed, 23 Jun, 2021, 4:56 am Justin Mclean,
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> As far as I know this is the situation. If anyone has any information to
> add please do so.
> - We have no CCLA or grant from
Many thanks Dave for replying.
Justin - thanks for replying. I think Dave has answered most of the
questions. The reason this thread is copied to both ACS PMC and general@ is
because this was intended as a starting point for ACS PMC and it was not
clear to me how the IP clearance process works.
Justin,
On Tue, Jun 22, 2021 at 7:22 PM Justin Mclean
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > 3. Paul to update and commit the IP clearance:
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/public/trunk/content/ip-clearance/cloudstack-terraform.xml
> > and send an email to general@incubator (/cc to
>
-clearance-template.html
Regards.
On Tue, Jun 22, 2021 at 3:26 PM Rohit Yadav wrote:
> Paul, ACS PMC /cc general@incubator, Sander,
>
> Following the process described on IP clearance [1], we've received
> acknowledgement Sander's ICLA and since you're volunteering I've committed
> the
All, Sander has confirmed sending the signed software grants PDF but I
don't see it. Does the PMC list filter emails with attachments? Any PMC
able to see his email?
Regards.
On Mon, 21 Jun, 2021, 5:42 pm Rohit Yadav, wrote:
> Justin - yes all top 5 major contributors have agreed for it
Angus
wrote:
> @Rohit Yadav
>
>
>
> I can do it as a Member or Gabriel can do it as an officer.
>
>
>
> As per the IP clearance page you reference, do you have the software grant
> ready to go?
>
>
>
> “A software grant must be provided to the ASF.
All,
We're in the process of accepting the Terraform provider codebase under ACS
PMC. The ACS PMC has already accepted the initiative and a vote on the same
has already passed: https://markmail.org/message/g4prb25g7wakbifa
As the next step, I was advised by ASF legal and others in the list to
21 matches
Mail list logo
