Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Linkis (Incubating) 1.3.0-RC2 (Round2）

+1 (non-binding) [YES] Download links are valid. [YES] Checksums and PGP signatures are valid. [YES] Source code distributions have correct names matching the current release. [YES] LICENSE and NOTICE files are correct for each repo. [YES] All files have license headers if necessary. [YES] No

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Pegasus (Incubating) 2.4.0-RC3

+1(non-binding) I checked: [YES] All download links are valid [YES] Checksum and signature are OK [YES] LICENSE and NOTICE are existed It is recommended to use this address[1] as the download URL of the KEYS file I notice Pegasus project has multiple releases under the dist/release area[2].

Re: [DISCUSS] Remove 72 hour waiting time to add PPMC members.

+1 non-binding Best Regards! Chen Xia Yu Xiao 于2022年10月14日周五 10:33写道： > > + 1 ，about add PPMC~ > > Best wishes! > > Yu Xiao > Apache ShenYu > > Austin Bennett 于2022年10月14日周五 10:24写道： > > > > +1 (non binding) > > > > Out of curiosity: is there a specific motivation for the change for the > >

Re: [VOTE] Accept Celeborn into the Apache Incubator

+1 (non-binding) Best Regards! Chen Xia Sunil Govindan 于2022年10月13日周四 08:24写道： > > +1 binding > > > > On Wed, Oct 12, 2022 at 2:43 PM Weiwei Yang wrote: > > > +1 (binding) > > Good luck!! > > > > On Wed, Oct 12, 2022 at 12:13 PM Felix Cheung > > wrote: > > > > > +1 (binding) > > > > > > > > >

About docker image release and license

We applied for the Docker Hub permission before[1], but the feedback Docker Hub is out of seats. It is recommended to use the Github Docker Registry. Does this meet the ASF docker image distribution requirements (The official website document[2] mentions:artifacts need to be placed in

Re: [VOTE] Heron Release 0.20.5-incubating Release Candidate 4

+1(non-binding) I checked: 1. All download links are valid 2. Checksum and signature are OK 3. LICENSE and NOTICE are existed I try to svn co from https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/heron/heron-0.20.5-incubating-rc4/ The entire file size is nearly 3591 MB, It takes a certain

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Kyuubi(Incubating) v1.6.0-incubating rc1

+1(non-binding) I checked: 1. All download links are valid 2. Checksum and signature are OK 3. LICENSE and NOTICE are existed I personally think the mail thread view url page presented by pony mail is better, as you used in the dev vote results[1] Need to pay attention, PPMC members have formal

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Linkis (Incubating) 1.2.0-RC1

Forward my +1 (non-binding) from dev@linkis Best Regards! Chen Xia 俊平堵 于2022年9月3日周六 09:09写道： > +1 binding. > > I checked: > - Download links are valid. > - The checksums and signatures are correct. - LICENSE and NOTICE files look > good. - DISCLAIMER in place. > - community vote result is

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache DevLake (Incubating) v0.13.0-rc1

+1 (non-binding) I checked [YES] release files have the word incubating in their name [YES] the digital signature and hashes correct [YES] DISCLAIMER-WIP file exists [YES] LICENSE and NOTICE files exist [YES] the NOTICE year correct I notice devlake has multiple releases under the dist/release

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Kvrocks(incubating) 2.1.0

+1 non-binding I checked: Incubating in name Verified signature and checksum LICENSE and NOTICE are fine DISCLAIMER file exist NOTICE year correct All files have license headers if necessary. By the way, as some IPMC suggested before[1], it's suggested not to use `Binding Vote` and `Non Binding`

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache DevLake (Incubating) v0.12.0-rc2

+1 (non-binding) I checked [YES] release files in correct location [YES] release files have the word incubating in their name [YES] the digital signature and hashes correct [YES] DISCLAIMER-WIP file exist [YES] LICENSE and NOTICE files exists [YES] the NOTICE year correct By the way, I see

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache brpc (Incubating) 1.2.0

+1 (non-binding) I checked [YES] release files in correct location [YES] release files have the word incubating in their name [YES] the digital signature and hashes correct [YES] DISCLAIMER file exist [YES] LICENSE and NOTICE files exists [YES] the LICENSE and NOTICE text correct [YES] the NOTICE

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Linkis (Incubating) 1.1.3-RC1

Forward my +1 from dev@linkis (non-binding) Best Regards! Chen Xia ShaoFeng Shi 于2022年7月26日周二 22:46写道： > +1 (binding) > > Looks good to me, I checked: > - the signature is by IPMC > - the sha hash is good > - LICENSE and NOTICE are there > - 'mvn clean install' success > > Best regards, > >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Linkis(Incubating) 1.1.2-RC2

Hi Justin Thanks for your advice. I have modified the README.md [1] to optimize the points you mentioned. Best Regards! Chen Xia 1 https://github.com/apache/incubator-linkis/blob/master/README.md Justin Mclean 于2022年6月30日周四 11:26写道： > Hi, > > +1 (binding) > > I checked: > - incubating in

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Linkis(Incubating) 1.1.2-RC1

Thank Justin for your very careful check. We did use the ASF license header incorrectly[1]. We will fix it to the right "New BSD" license and state it in the LICENSE file. We contacted the committer of the util directory code file to confirm that the license is correct. For the dom.js file

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Linkis(Incubating) 1.1.2-RC1

+1(non-binding) I have checked: [OK] Download links are valid. [OK] Checksums and PGP signatures are valid. [OK] There are LICENSE and NOTICE files. [OK] There is a DISCLAIMER file. [OK] The year in the NOTICE file is correct. [OK] All text files have ASF license. [OK] No unlicensed compiled

Re: [DISCUSS] Graduate Apache MXNet (incubating) as a Top Level Project

Hi: I notice There is a minor issue with the MXNet website, some check type not pass the website check here: https://whimsy.apache.org/pods/project/mxnet Best Regards! Chen Xia Gordon 于2022年6月3日周五 13:09写道： > +1 binding > > > On Thu, Jun 2, 2022, 9:22 PM Mingshen Sun wrote: > > > +1

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Linkis (Incubating) 1.1.1-RC1

Hi Justin, Thanks for your reminder, About "how contributions to the project are licensed",I found some useful information: According to py4j CONTRIBUTING.rst[1]: "Py4J does not have an official Contributor License Agreement (CLA), but it is assumed that as soon as you make a contribution

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Linkis (Incubating) 1.1.1-RC1

Hi Justin We found that the new version of py4j has removed the backport.py file, so after our evaluation, we upgraded the py4j version to py4j-0.10.7-src.zip[1]. But the py file is still missing license headers and have different authors[2]. We don't know how to solve this problem. [1]

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Linkis (Incubating) 1.1.1-RC1

Hi Justin I also find that other projects also have this issue such as spark[1] , flink[2] and so on. Is it necessary to start a new thread email to discuss this? Looking forward to your further reply. [1] https://github.com/apache/spark/blob/master/python/lib/py4j-0.10.9.5-src.zip [2]

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Linkis (Incubating) 1.1.1-RC1

> > Hi Justin > > I confirmed in the py4j-0.10.7-src.zip file, and the backport.py file > clearly states that it is all licensed under the PSF License. > > So can it be considered that py4j-0.10.7-src.zip is licensed under > BDS license, except that backport.py is under PSF license > > In this

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Linkis (Incubating) 1.1.1-RC1

Copy my +1 from dev@linkis (non-binding) Best Regards! Chen Xia peacewong 于2022年5月11日周三 15:13写道： > Hello Incubator Community, > > This is a call for a vote to release Apache Linkis(Incubating) version > 1.1.1-RC1 > > The Apache Linkis community has voted on and approved a proposal to

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Linkis (Incubating) 1.1.0-RC2

Forward my + 1 from linkis@dev (non-binding) Chen Xia wangxiaogang 于2022年4月6日周三 12:24写道： > > There was a small error in the first email, the second email was corrected: > > "Hello Linkis Community," --> "Hello Incubator Community," > > Lidong Dai 于2022年4月5日周二 23:05写道： > > > > by the way, I