Re: [SOLVED] [gentoo-user] CPU flags unsatisfied

On 30 March 2017 at 02:24, wrote: > replace in make.conf CFLAGS= > with (in my case) > CPU_FLAGS_X86="aes avx avx2 fma3 mmx mmxext popcnt sse sse2 sse3 sse4_1 > sse4_2 ssse3" > CFLAGS and CPU_FLAGS_X86 are NOT the same thing, you can't replace one with the other, you

[gentoo-user] [OT] busybox fsck vs. fsck.ext4 ... experiences?

Hi, Before doing the wrong decision: How "secure" is it to use fsck of busybox in a limited environment (SoC) to check sdcard partitions (etx4) occasionally instead of using fsck.ext4 ? Does someone has some experiences with this ? Thanks a lot in advance for any help! Cheers Meino

Re: [SOLVED] [gentoo-user] CPU flags unsatisfied

On 03/29/2017 05:24 PM, the...@sys-concept.com wrote: > Yes, that was the solution, thank you. > > run: cpuinfo2cpuflags-x86 > > replace in make.conf CFLAGS= > with (in my case) > CPU_FLAGS_X86="aes avx avx2 fma3 mmx mmxext popcnt sse sse2 sse3 sse4_1 > sse4_2 ssse3" > > run: > emerge --deep

Re: [gentoo-user] CPU flags unsatisfied

On 03/29/2017 05:08 PM, Alan McKinnon wrote: > On 29/03/2017 23:11, the...@sys-concept.com wrote: >> When I try to emerge any application that require audio eg: firefox, ffmpeg, >> asterisk etc. >> I get >> >> !!! The ebuild selected to satisfy >>

Re: [SOLVED] [gentoo-user] CPU flags unsatisfied

On 03/29/2017 05:33 PM, Dale wrote: > the...@sys-concept.com wrote: >> When I try to emerge any application that require audio eg: firefox, ffmpeg, >> asterisk etc. >> I get >> >> SNIPPY >>> > > You may want to try this: > > root@fireball / # equery b cpuinfo2cpuflags-x86 > * Searching

Re: [gentoo-user] CPU flags unsatisfied

the...@sys-concept.com wrote: > When I try to emerge any application that require audio eg: firefox, ffmpeg, > asterisk etc. > I get > > >>> SNIPPY >>> You may want to try this: root@fireball / # equery b cpuinfo2cpuflags-x86 * Searching for cpuinfo2cpuflags-x86 ...

Re: [gentoo-user] CPU flags unsatisfied

On 29/03/2017 23:11, the...@sys-concept.com wrote: > When I try to emerge any application that require audio eg: firefox, ffmpeg, > asterisk etc. > I get > > !!! The ebuild selected to satisfy >

Re: [gentoo-user] CPU flags unsatisfied

On Wed, 29 Mar 2017 15:11:17 -0600, the...@sys-concept.com wrote: > The following REQUIRED_USE flag constraints are unsatisfied: > cpu_flags_x86_sse? ( cpu_flags_x86_mmxext ) If you have sse in CPU_FLAGS_X86 you must also have mmxext. man 5 ebuild explains the syntax of these statements.

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Firefox occasionally stalls

Peter Humphrey wrote: > On Tuesday 21 Mar 2017 14:59:48 Dale wrote: > >> Ublock is another option as well. I use it on some Firefox profiles. >> It does seem to respond better than Adblock but some things I don't like >> about Ublock. >> >> I may look into that Ghostery too. See if it is

Re: [gentoo-user] HD 630?

On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 7:46 AM, Todd Goodman wrote: > * Jorge Almeida [170327 18:04]: >> This may be a stupid question, for one of two possible reasons, but >> here it goes: >> >> I'm thinking of buying a recent Intel CPU (7th generation, in >>

Re: [gentoo-user] drivers for INTEL integrated GPU?

On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 11:54 AM, Jorge Almeida wrote: > On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 2:28 PM, R0b0t1 wrote: >> On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 3:39 AM, Jorge Almeida wrote: > >> >>

[gentoo-user] CPU flags unsatisfied

When I try to emerge any application that require audio eg: firefox, ffmpeg, asterisk etc. I get !!! The ebuild selected to satisfy

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: [OT] router woes

On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 12:56 PM, Gregory Woodbury wrote: > I have a similar setup here in Frontier territory. The ADSL circuit > connects to their Netgeat/Westell B90 > which has wifi and 4 ethernet ports. One ethernet port connects to my > "internal" DLink-615 which serves

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: [OT] router woes

On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 12:49 PM, Daniel Frey wrote: > On 03/29/2017 12:07 PM, Jorge Almeida wrote: >> I think I need wan-to-lan. Anyway, those numbers seem too good to be >> true. 919Mbps with a $61 TP-Link AC1200? What would explain my poor >> results? >> > > I just looked

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: [OT] router woes

I have a similar setup here in Frontier territory. The ADSL circuit connects to their Netgeat/Westell B90 which has wifi and 4 ethernet ports. One ethernet port connects to my "internal" DLink-615 which serves the rest of the unit. The only limiting link is the ADSL link, the rest of the place

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: [OT] router woes

On 03/29/2017 12:07 PM, Jorge Almeida wrote: > I think I need wan-to-lan. Anyway, those numbers seem too good to be > true. 919Mbps with a $61 TP-Link AC1200? What would explain my poor > results? > I just looked and that's not your router. The router they tested has a dual core 800MHz CPU. The

Re: [gentoo-user] Too many invalid recipients. (in reply to MAIL FROM command))

On Wed, 29 Mar 2017 10:53:35 -0600, the...@sys-concept.com wrote: > I don't have anything in "mydestination" it is commented out and I think > it should be. When I put my in mydestination=my domain > in outgoing email syslog was showing: relay=local > and I never got the email the relayhost= as

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: [OT] router woes

On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 11:28 AM, Kai Krakow wrote: > Am Wed, 29 Mar 2017 04:52:08 -0700 > schrieb Jorge Almeida : > >> On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 12:45 AM, Neil Bothwick >> wrote: >> > On Tue, 28 Mar 2017 22:52:25 -0700, Jorge Almeida

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: [OT] router woes

On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 11:16 AM, Kai Krakow wrote: > Am Tue, 28 Mar 2017 21:19:29 +0100 > schrieb Jorge Almeida : > > > I'm using a 400 MBps cable link here, directly connected, I can get 48 > MBytes/s out of it (which should be very close if not even

[gentoo-user] Re: [OT] router woes

Am Wed, 29 Mar 2017 04:52:08 -0700 schrieb Jorge Almeida : > On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 12:45 AM, Neil Bothwick > wrote: > > On Tue, 28 Mar 2017 22:52:25 -0700, Jorge Almeida wrote: > > > > > > > It's more a privacy issue that security for me. I have a

[gentoo-user] Re: [OT] router woes

Am Tue, 28 Mar 2017 21:19:29 +0100 schrieb Jorge Almeida : > I have net by cable with nominal speed 200Mbps. The ISP provides a > modem/router Netgear (from Numericable). I disabled the WiFi and I > have 2 computers connected via ethernet to the router. The speed is > about

Re: [gentoo-user] Bluetooth and hciconfig

On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 04:53:44PM +0100, Mick wrote: > # AutoEnable defines option to enable all controllers when they are found. > # This includes adapters present on start as well as adapters that are plugged > # in later on. Defaults to 'false'. > AutoEnable = true >

[gentoo-user] Re: [OT] Redirecting traffic for a TCP port to another gateway

Am Wed, 29 Mar 2017 19:30:11 +1100 schrieb Adam Carter : > > > > schrieb Dan Johansson : > >> > [...] > >> > The general term for that is "policy routing". > > If you're doing it to hack around some network weirdness that you > cant fix

[gentoo-user] Re: Too many invalid recipients. (in reply to MAIL FROM command))

Am Tue, 28 Mar 2017 23:24:15 -0600 schrieb the...@sys-concept.com: > On 03/28/2017 10:57 PM, the...@sys-concept.com wrote: > [snip > [...] > >> > >> "man aliases" will probably give you the answer. > >> > >> -- > >> Regards > >> wabe > > > > No, it will not! Well, actually it will. But

Re: [gentoo-user] Too many invalid recipients. (in reply to MAIL FROM command))

On March 29, 2017 5:34:48 PM GMT+02:00, wabe wrote: >"J. Roeleveld" wrote: > >> On March 29, 2017 7:24:15 AM GMT+02:00, the...@sys-concept.com wrote: >> >On 03/28/2017 10:57 PM, the...@sys-concept.com wrote: >> >[snip >> [69.49.] said: 550 5.7.1

Re: [gentoo-user] HD 630?

On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 5:46 AM, Todd Goodman wrote: > * Jorge Almeida [170327 18:04]: > > > I've built a number of desktop machines using Intel i7 (mostly) CPUs > with integrated GPU and all have been supported well in my > gentoo-sources kernels. > > I

Re: [gentoo-user] drivers for INTEL integrated GPU?

On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 2:28 PM, R0b0t1 wrote: > On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 3:39 AM, Jorge Almeida wrote: > > http://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/support/graphics-drivers/05520.html > ev says that everything up to Intel HD 620 is supported. It is >

Re: [gentoo-user] Too many invalid recipients. (in reply to MAIL FROM command))

On 03/29/2017 09:34 AM, wabe wrote: > "J. Roeleveld" wrote: > [snip] >> >> There are plenty of howtos, guides and documents online detailing how >> to do this with a variety of mail servers. >> >> Please use Google. > > Hint: Search for "postfix mydestination" > > -- >

[gentoo-user] Setting up shorewall

Hello list, I've been using shorewall happily for many years, but now I have a LAN setup that the docs seem not to cover. The new web-server box I mentioned recently has two Ethernet ports, which I want to connect as follows: Port 1 (enp1s0) will be connected to a spare port on my vDSL

Re: [gentoo-user] Too many invalid recipients. (in reply to MAIL FROM command))

"J. Roeleveld" wrote: > On March 29, 2017 7:24:15 AM GMT+02:00, the...@sys-concept.com wrote: > >On 03/28/2017 10:57 PM, the...@sys-concept.com wrote: > >[snip > [69.49.] said: 550 5.7.1 <>... Too many > invalid recipients. (in reply to MAIL FROM command)) >

Re: [gentoo-user] emerge : what generates this error message

On 03/29/2017 02:06:40 PM, Raffaele Belardi wrote: Helmut Jarausch wrote: Hi, I have unmerged the package sci-libs/opencascade. From then on, for any emerge action, I get the error message !!! File Not Found: '/etc/env.d/51opencascade' This occurs, e.g., between

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Online hosting recommendation - VMs?

* Harry Putnam [170327 22:09]: > Stroller, just a note on my experience this evening. I liked what I > saw about linode in this thread.. Decided to try them out. > > Got started with them... I was working from the command line in my new > gentoo vm provided by linode.

Re: [gentoo-user] HD 630?

* Jorge Almeida [170327 18:04]: > This may be a stupid question, for one of two possible reasons, but > here it goes: > > I'm thinking of buying a recent Intel CPU (7th generation, in > saleslang), say an i5-7400, and it came to mind, not too late yet, > that the integrated

Re: [gentoo-user] [OT] router woes

On mer. 29 mars 05:02:16 2017, Jorge Almeida wrote: > BTW, I've been using dnscache (from djbdns) for years. I suppose that > protects against spoofing? It depends of from what you want to protect. DNS is an all clear protocol, it’s easy to modify packet. Plus, the DNSSEC deployment is too few,

Re: [gentoo-user] [OT] router woes

On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 1:59 AM, Adam Carter wrote: > On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 7:19 AM, Jorge Almeida wrote: >> > > The next hop after the ISP supplied router is another piece of the ISPs > network equipment, so the ISP access to your data is

Re: [gentoo-user] emerge : what generates this error message

Helmut Jarausch wrote: Hi, I have unmerged the package sci-libs/opencascade. From then on, for any emerge action, I get the error message !!! File Not Found: '/etc/env.d/51opencascade' This occurs, e.g., between media-sound/amarok-2.8.90-r2 merged. and Regenerating /etc/ld.so.cache...

Re: [gentoo-user] [OT] router woes

On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 12:47 AM, Mick wrote: > On Tuesday 28 Mar 2017 22:52:25 Jorge Almeida wrote: > > Many ISPs today implement TR-069 (a standard of the DSL forum) to access > customer equipment remotely for service provisioning. They use configuration > servers

Re: [gentoo-user] [OT] router woes

On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 12:45 AM, Neil Bothwick wrote: > On Tue, 28 Mar 2017 22:52:25 -0700, Jorge Almeida wrote: > > > It's more a privacy issue that security for me. I have a similar setup > with a virgin cable router, which I set to what they call modem mode, > where only

Re: [gentoo-user] emerge : what generates this error message

On 29/03/2017 13:15, Alexander Kapshuk wrote: > On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 2:03 PM, Helmut Jarausch wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I have unmerged the package sci-libs/opencascade. >> >> From then on, for any emerge action, I get the error message >> >> !!! File Not Found:

Re: [gentoo-user] emerge : what generates this error message

On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 2:03 PM, Helmut Jarausch wrote: > Hi, > > I have unmerged the package sci-libs/opencascade. > > From then on, for any emerge action, I get the error message > > !!! File Not Found: '/etc/env.d/51opencascade' > > > This occurs, e.g., between >

[gentoo-user] emerge : what generates this error message

Hi, I have unmerged the package sci-libs/opencascade. From then on, for any emerge action, I get the error message !!! File Not Found: '/etc/env.d/51opencascade' This occurs, e.g., between media-sound/amarok-2.8.90-r2 merged. and Regenerating /etc/ld.so.cache... What part of Gentoo

Re: [gentoo-user] [OT] router woes

On Wednesday 29 Mar 2017 19:59:18 Adam Carter wrote: > On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 7:19 AM, Jorge Almeida wrote: > > Which part is to blame? The secondary router boasts 1300Mbps on 5GHz > > WiFi, so I assumed it could deal with 150Mbps on cat5e ethernet cable. > > The power

Re: [gentoo-user] [OT] router woes

On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 7:19 AM, Jorge Almeida wrote: > I have net by cable with nominal speed 200Mbps. The ISP provides a > modem/router Netgear (from Numericable). I disabled the WiFi and I > have 2 computers connected via ethernet to the router. The speed is > about

Re: [gentoo-user] [OT] router woes

On Wednesday 29 Mar 2017 08:45:33 Neil Bothwick wrote: > On Tue, 28 Mar 2017 22:52:25 -0700, Jorge Almeida wrote: > > PS. I still would like to know what people in this list think about > > having an ISP managed device as router, re security. Not that I have > > any real option if I want the

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: [OT] Redirecting traffic for a TCP port to another gateway

> > schrieb Dan Johansson : >> >>> >>> Is it possible, using iptables or something equivalent, to redirect >>> traffic to some specific TCP ports to another gateway than the >>> default-gateway? >>> >> The general term for that is "policy routing". If you're doing it to hack

Re: [gentoo-user] [OT] router woes

On mar. 28 mars 22:52:25 2017, Jorge Almeida wrote: > I've been using an RT-N16 for years, and it still works fine. They > don't advertise big speeds and I understood it doesn't have the CPU > power to cope. I assumed a new generation router would do the job. Big > mistake. I have an 1G fiber at

Re: [gentoo-user] HD 630?

Den 28. mars 2017 00:03, skrev Jorge Almeida: This may be a stupid question, for one of two possible reasons, but here it goes: I'm thinking of buying a recent Intel CPU (7th generation, in saleslang), say an i5-7400, and it came to mind, not too late yet, that the integrated GPU may not be

Re: [gentoo-user] [OT] router woes

On Tuesday 28 Mar 2017 22:52:25 Jorge Almeida wrote: > PS. I still would like to know what people in this list think about > having an ISP managed device as router, re security. Not that I have > any real option if I want the contracted speed... Many ISPs today implement TR-069 (a standard of

Re: [gentoo-user] [OT] router woes

On Tue, 28 Mar 2017 22:52:25 -0700, Jorge Almeida wrote: > PS. I still would like to know what people in this list think about > having an ISP managed device as router, re security. Not that I have > any real option if I want the contracted speed... It's more a privacy issue that security for

[gentoo-user] RE: elibtoolize Portage patch requested, but failed to apply!

Hi all, It's solved and it was my fault. I have had to put elt-patches in /etc/portage/profile/package.provided to compile new version of portage with success two days ago and I forget it . Have a good days ! Easy Service Informatique Erwan Rigollot Intervenant technique Easy Service

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: [OT] Redirecting traffic for a TCP port to another gateway

On 2017-03-28 21:48, Kai Krakow wrote: Am Tue, 28 Mar 2017 21:26:05 +0200 schrieb Dan Johansson : Is it possible, using iptables or something equivalent, to redirect traffic to some specific TCP ports to another gateway than the default-gateway? Eg. Host

Re: [gentoo-user] Online hosting recommendation - VMs?

> On 29 Mar 2017, at 06:43, Arthur Țițeică wrote: >> >> €5 a month seems an ideal price, but I can probably afford a little >> more. > > Dedibox/Online has real hardware (dedicated servers) for 15 or 30€ on the > personal range. The more expensive one has 2 SSDs for