[gentoo-user] Re: Issues with AMD_IOMMU

On 2017-05-14 20:07, Corbin Bird wrote: > Background / System Info : 2 systems. > Chipset 990FX, FX-9590 ( -march=bdver2 / Fam15h ) > Chipset 790FX, PhenomII 980 ( -march=amdfam10 / Fam10h ) > Gentoo x86_64, multilib, Kernel 4.9.x > IOMMU enabled in UEFI, BIOS. > General Info : ( if you don't

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: replacement for ftp?

On Sun, 14 May 2017 02:59:41 +0100 lee wrote: > That requires shell access. Not necessarily, it just requires a competent ISP. For instance, there's no shell access on github, but there's still ssh-based sync. So you just need to have a restricted environment that only

Re: [gentoo-user] Issues with AMD_IOMMU

On a Phenom II?Yeah, I just retired mine a month ago. On that > system, the IOMMU hardware was kinda a legacy orphan thingy, I had to go > through all kinds of gyrations on the kernel command line in order to > initialize it correctly. I think I had it off in the bios, then enabled > it using

Re: [gentoo-user] Issues with AMD_IOMMU

I've added iommu=pt to my kernel command line, and now have; [1.240242] AMD-Vi: Found IOMMU at :00:00.2 cap 0x40 I was looking at IOMMU in the hope that my Win10 vmware guest would be more stable. No change, however. > APU? > I was under the impression that those CPU's used a different

Re: [gentoo-user] world rebuild with gcc-6.3.0 - not completely there yet

On Sun, May 14, 2017 at 05:22:27AM -0400, Rasmus Thomsen wrote > Hi, > > unwind tables sounds really interesting, but does it affect the > binary size when I compile with -O2 anyway? Yes, because it's a different part of the build. Personal experience; I do the contributed SSE-only Pale Moon

Re: [gentoo-user] world rebuild with gcc-6.3.0 - not completely there yet

On Sun, May 14, 2017 at 11:05:14AM +0200, Helmut Jarausch wrote > Many thanks for your hints! > > On 05/14/2017 07:13:05 AM, Walter Dnes wrote: > > Out of sheer curiousity, what > > does gcc report as your native cpu when you run... > > > > gcc -c -Q -march=native --help=target | grep march= >

Re: [gentoo-user] Issues with AMD_IOMMU

On 05/14/2017 12:31 AM, Adam Carter wrote: > Tried kernels 4.10.13 and 4.11, with > CONFIG_GART_IOMMU=y > CONFIG_IOMMU_HELPER=y > CONFIG_IOMMU_API=y > CONFIG_IOMMU_SUPPORT=y > CONFIG_IOMMU_IOVA=y > CONFIG_AMD_IOMMU=y > CONFIG_AMD_IOMMU_V2=m > Chipset is 990FX, and AFAICT the V2 is for the APU

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: replacement for ftp?

On Sun, May 14, 2017 at 4:47 PM, R0b0t1 wrote: > That is only in one setup. It is possible to assign an IP address to > OpenVPN such that you will need any traffic to cross onto your LAN. > Whoops: "It is possible to assign an IP address to OpenVPN such that you will need

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: replacement for ftp?

On Sun, May 14, 2017 at 3:52 AM, Mick wrote: >> I had some problems setting up OpenVPN that were solved by using >> per-client public keys. That seems to be the best supported >> configuration (as well as the most secure). Windows-side using >> OpenVPN-GUI is very easy.

Re: [gentoo-user] replacement for ftp?

On 03/05/2017 22:04, lee wrote: > Alan McKinnon writes: > >> On 30/04/2017 03:11, lee wrote: >>> "Poison BL." writes: >>> On Sat, Apr 29, 2017 at 3:24 PM, lee wrote: > Mick writes: >

Re: [gentoo-user] Issues with AMD_IOMMU

On 05/14/2017 01:31 AM, Adam Carter wrote: Tried kernels 4.10.13 and 4.11, with CONFIG_GART_IOMMU=y CONFIG_IOMMU_HELPER=y CONFIG_IOMMU_API=y CONFIG_IOMMU_SUPPORT=y CONFIG_IOMMU_IOVA=y CONFIG_AMD_IOMMU=y CONFIG_AMD_IOMMU_V2=m Chipset is 990FX, and AFAICT the V2 is for the APU (bdver3 and 4

Re: [gentoo-user] Issues with AMD_IOMMU

Adam Carter wrote: > Tried kernels 4.10.13 and 4.11, with > CONFIG_GART_IOMMU=y > CONFIG_IOMMU_HELPER=y > CONFIG_IOMMU_API=y > CONFIG_IOMMU_SUPPORT=y > CONFIG_IOMMU_IOVA=y > CONFIG_AMD_IOMMU=y > CONFIG_AMD_IOMMU_V2=m > Chipset is 990FX, and AFAICT the V2 is for the APU (bdver3 and 4 vintage). > >

Re: [gentoo-user] Pseudo first impressions

On 05/13/2017 06:05 PM, lee wrote: > It worked --- now some time when I do upgrade the kernel, I somehow need > to remove these sources from the world list, I guess ... > That's easy: `emerge --deselect sys-kernel/gentoo-sources:4.4.52` undoes my previous suggestion. Dan

Re: [gentoo-user] gcc 6 PIE use flag

> > the Gentoo dev list. I'd normally just link to a mail archive, but it's >> too new to have been archived yet. Here's a copy of the proposed news >> item. Note the example error message about relocation against .rodata >> >>

Re: [gentoo-user] [OT] Tux AWOL

On Sun, May 14, 2017 at 10:50 AM, Alan Mackenzie wrote: > > I see 16 Tuxen at boot up, no problem. A whole raft, then. (Or is it a waddle?) I was happy enough with my huddle of 4... > > Something strange happened when I installed the 4.11.0 sources - all the > options were

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: [OT] Tux AWOL

On Sun, May 14, 2017 at 10:37 AM, Kai Krakow wrote: > Am Sun, 14 May 2017 10:11:31 +0100 > schrieb Jorge Almeida : >> >> >> I suppose it's goodbye to Tux, for now. I was hoping someone else >> would be using the same kernel... > > You could setup

[gentoo-user] Re: replacement for ftp?

Am Sun, 14 May 2017 01:25:24 +0100 schrieb lee : > "Poison BL." writes: > > > On Sat, Apr 29, 2017 at 9:11 PM, lee wrote: > >> > >> "Poison BL." writes: > [...] > > trust > [...] > >> > >> Why not? (12GB

[gentoo-user] Re: replacement for ftp?

Am Sun, 14 May 2017 01:28:55 +0100 schrieb lee : > Kai Krakow writes: > > > Am Sat, 29 Apr 2017 22:02:51 -0400 > > schrieb "Walter Dnes" : > > > >> Then there's always "sneakernet". To quote Andrew Tanenbaum from > >> 1981 > >>

Re: [gentoo-user] [OT] Tux AWOL

Hello, Jorge. On Sat, May 13, 2017 at 09:46:41 +0100, Jorge Almeida wrote: > In case someone is using kernel 4.11: I tried it and everything seems > fine, except that the linux logo on the boot screen (i.e. tty1) is > gone. It was there before (with 4.10.9), and I used make oldconfig. > So,

[gentoo-user] Re: replacement for ftp?

Am Sun, 14 May 2017 02:18:56 +0100 schrieb lee : > Kai Krakow writes: > > > Am Sat, 29 Apr 2017 20:02:57 +0100 > > schrieb lee : > > > >> Alan McKinnon writes: > >> > [...] > [...] > [...] > >> >

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: replacement for ftp?

On Sun, 14 May 2017 02:48:46 +0100, lee wrote: > > But you could offer access via OpenVPN and tunnel samba through > > that. > > I haven't been able yet to figure out what implications creating a VPN > has. I understand it's supposed to connect networks through a secured > tunnel, but what

[gentoo-user] Re: [OT] Tux AWOL

Am Sun, 14 May 2017 10:11:31 +0100 schrieb Jorge Almeida : > On Sun, May 14, 2017 at 9:31 AM, Kai Krakow > wrote: > > Am Sun, 14 May 2017 08:32:46 +0100 > > schrieb Jorge Almeida : > > [...] > > > >> $ zgrep -i logo

[gentoo-user] Re: replacement for ftp?

Am Sun, 14 May 2017 09:52:41 +0100 schrieb Mick : > On Saturday 13 May 2017 23:58:17 R0b0t1 wrote: > > I had some problems setting up OpenVPN that were solved by using > > per-client public keys. That seems to be the best supported > > configuration (as well as the most

Re: [gentoo-user] Pseudo first impressions

On Sun, 14 May 2017 02:05:58 +0100, lee wrote: > > It will only remove things that it deems not needed. Usually these are > > packages that have just been upgraded. > > Yes, the sources wouldn't be needed if I had upgraded the kernel. Still > one might expect it to figure out which kernel is

Re: [gentoo-user] world rebuild with gcc-6.3.0 - not completely there yet

Hi, unwind tables sounds really interesting, but does it affect the binary size when I compile with -O2 anyway? Regards, Rasmus Original Message On 14 May 2017, 07:13, Walter Dnes wrote: On Sat, May 13, 2017 at 10:21:19AM +0200, Helmut Jarausch wrote > > I have switched to

[gentoo-user] Re: replacement for ftp?

Am Sun, 14 May 2017 02:48:46 +0100 schrieb lee : > Kai Krakow writes: > > > Am Sat, 29 Apr 2017 20:30:03 +0100 > > schrieb lee : > > > >> Danny YUE writes: > >> > [...] > [...] > [...] > >> > >>

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: replacement for ftp?

> > These certificates are a very stupid thing. They are utterly > > complicated, you have to self-sign them which produces warnings, and > > they require to have the host name within them as if the host wasn't > > known by several different names. > > Use LetsEncrypt then, you can add any number

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: [OT] Tux AWOL

On Sun, May 14, 2017 at 9:31 AM, Kai Krakow wrote: > Am Sun, 14 May 2017 08:32:46 +0100 > schrieb Jorge Almeida : >> >> In case someone is using kernel 4.11: I tried it and everything >> >> seems fine, except that the linux logo on the boot screen (i.e.

Re: [gentoo-user] world rebuild with gcc-6.3.0 - not completely there yet

Many thanks for your hints! On 05/14/2017 07:13:05 AM, Walter Dnes wrote: Why aren't you running "-march=native"? You're probably missing quite a few features of your cpu. BTW, "-march=native" implies "-mtune=native" and "-msse3" (if the cpu supports it). Out of sheer curiousity, what

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: replacement for ftp?

On Saturday 13 May 2017 23:58:17 R0b0t1 wrote: > On Wed, May 3, 2017 at 1:40 AM, Mick wrote: > > On Monday 01 May 2017 22:36:00 Nils Freydank wrote: > >> On Sat, 30 Apr 2017 19:04:06 +0200 Andrew Savchenko wrote: > >> > [...] > >> > I fail to see why FTP needs to be

[gentoo-user] Re: replacement for ftp?

Am Sun, 14 May 2017 02:59:41 +0100 schrieb lee : > Kai Krakow writes: > > > Am Sat, 29 Apr 2017 20:38:24 +0100 > > schrieb lee : > > > >> Kai Krakow writes: > >> > [...] > [...] > [...] > >> > >>

[gentoo-user] Re: [OT] Tux AWOL

Am Sun, 14 May 2017 08:32:46 +0100 schrieb Jorge Almeida : > On Sun, May 14, 2017 at 4:30 AM, Stroller > wrote: > > > >> On 13 May 2017, at 09:46, Jorge Almeida > >> wrote: > >> > >> In case someone is using kernel

Re: [gentoo-user] [OT] Tux AWOL

On Sun, May 14, 2017 at 4:30 AM, Stroller wrote: > >> On 13 May 2017, at 09:46, Jorge Almeida wrote: >> >> In case someone is using kernel 4.11: I tried it and everything seems >> fine, except that the linux logo on the boot screen (i.e. tty1)