I keep getting this exception when people push to their repositories, it
says that the push count since gc is 706 ... which is strange because I ran
the repo_housekeeping script and it told me that it gc'ed this repository.
This is running on a stand-alone server, 2 dual core CPU's (4 cores
This exception keeps getting thrown, now I don't understand why, and I have
no idea how to even start debugging the situation. Let me describe the
hardware I am running on and some basic stats about the repository, if you
guys have any ideas as to where I can start looking i'd appreciate that.
Possibly related:
It appears that gitorious includes a locked down activesupport 2.3.5 in
vendor/rails.
I have the activesupport 3.2.7 installed from gems. Is this a problem?
On Friday, August 3, 2012 1:42:34 AM UTC-7, Carlos wrote:
I was able to get the tests to run -- more or less -
On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 11:03 AM, Carlos cmu...@gmail.com wrote:
Possibly related:
It appears that gitorious includes a locked down activesupport 2.3.5 in
vendor/rails.
I have the activesupport 3.2.7 installed from gems. Is this a problem?
Carlos,
Gitorious uses a vendored version of
On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 3:37 AM, Ken Dreyer ktdre...@ktdreyer.com wrote:
On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 4:17 AM, dpwrussell r...@dpwrussell.com wrote:
I see that there is the concept of versioning for some time now in
Gitorious, but all the installation instructions I have seen involve a
checkout
On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 3:37 AM, Ken Dreyer ktdre...@ktdreyer.com wrote:
Speaking as a packager, even if we didn't have backports and multiple
supported branches, it would be cool if Gitorious AS cut new versions
a bit more often. If that were the case, who knows, we might get a
step closer to
On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 8:29 PM, Carlos cmu...@gmail.com wrote:
I see the options have expanded to include resque and what appears to be a
lightweight synchronous messaging mode. I'm really not interested in
sync. I wonder if anyone can offer some general advice on picking resque
versus
Thanks, Marius. I will try with ruby 1.8. Based on some comments I read,
I thought problems with ruby 1.9 might be limited to encodings...which I
hoped I could work around. Maybe not. I realize that a lot of apps are
frozen on ruby 1.8. That's ok. I don't see many people rushing to adopt
Oh wow thank you very much! Works like a charm!
On Thursday, August 2, 2012 10:47:00 PM UTC-4, Federico Don wrote:
could you try with this setup?
production:
disable_default: false
methods:
- adapter: Gitorious::Authentication::LDAPAuthentication
host: 172.17.195.115
Thanks again, Maurius. I see that resque seems to be pretty popular.
Cool. I get to reuse what I know about Redis. :)
On Aug 3, 2012 2:18 AM, Marius Mårnes Mathiesen
marius.mathie...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 8:29 PM, Carlos cmu...@gmail.com wrote:
I see the options have
Nice summary. Having done a few,substantial webapps on other platforms but
not RoR, I'm not sure how relevant my perspective is. All the same, I know
that in *app deployment* I see value in bundling to isolate my apps for
stability. Lockdown is the line of last defense against hyperactive
Hi,
#3: Fedora has dropped ruby-net-ldap in favor of net-ldap. I don't yet
know how much work it would be to patch Gitorious to use the net-ldap
Gem.
Its the same. In fact, I think I did a merge request a couple of months ago
with this change. It got delayed and I need to re-do the change
12 matches
Mail list logo
